SEC Company Response from ATLAS PIPELINE PARTNERS LP (CIK 0001092914) — Apr 27, 2005
ATLAS PIPELINE PARTNERS LP (CIK 0001092914)
Date: April 27, 2005 · CIK: 0001092914 · Accession: 0000950116-05-001485
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
Referenced dates: April 14, 2005
Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm
April 27, 2005
Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C. 20549-0405
Attn: Michael Moran, Branch
Chief
Re:
Atlas Pipeline Partners,
Inc.
Form 10-K for the year ended
December 2004
Filed March 16,
2005
File No.
1-14998
Dear Mr. Moran:
This
letter responds to your comment letter dated April 14, 2005 concerning the
above-referenced filing (the “2004 10-K”). For your convenience, we
first
restate your comment in italics and then provide our response.
Item 1. Description of
Business
General,
page 3
1.
You indicate that your
revenues include the sale of natural gas, natural gas liquids, condensate,
and the gathering, compressing, treating, processing, and transporting of
natural gas. In future filings, please disclose the amount or
percentage of total revenue contributed by any class of similar products
that accounted for 10% or more of total revenues for all periods
presented. Refer to Item 101(c)(1)(i) of
S-K.
We will revise future filings in
“Description of Business — General” to disclose the percent
of total revenue for any classes of products or services that account for
10% or more of total revenues for all periods presented by adding the
following two sentences at the end of the first paragraph of that section,
completed for the appropriate fiscal year:
“We derive our revenues
principally from the sale of natural gas and natural gas liquids, and
transportation and compression fees. During the year ended December
31, ____, the sale of natural gas and natural gas liquids
Securities and Exchange Commission
April 27, 2005
Page 2
constituted ___% of our total
revenues, and transportation and compression fees constituted ___% of our
total revenues.”
Item 6. Selected
Financial Data, page 21
2.
Please expand your disclosure
to indicate, if so, that EBITDA as defined by you is consistent with the
definition of EBITDA in your credit facility.
As disclosed in the reconciling
footnote, our method for calculating EBITDA for the purposes of our
selected financial data may be different than the method we use in other
contexts, e.g., under our credit facility. In fact, the agreement
governing the credit facility that was in place as of December 31, 2004
permitted us to include in the EBITDA calculations that were required
under the facility pro forma adjustments, acceptable to the administrative
agent under the facility, following material acquisitions. We
entered into a new credit facility on April 14, 2005 which will permit us
to make similar pro forma adjustments. Accordingly, in future
filings, we will add a statement in “Description of Business –
Credit Facility,” at the end of the one sentence third paragraph, as
follows:
“The credit facility defines
EBITDA to include pro forma adjustments, acceptable to Wachovia Bank as
administrator of the facility, following material acquisitions. This
calculation of EBITDA differs materially from the calculation set forth in
“Selected Financial Data.”
We will add the following at the
end of the first paragraph following the table in “Selected Financial
Data:”
“The EBITDA calculation
below is different from the EBITDA calculation under our credit
facility. For a description of how EBITDA is calculated under our
credit facility, see “Description of Business – Credit
Facility.”
Item 7. Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operation
Contractual Obligations and
Commercial Commitments, page 33
3.
Please advise or revise your
disclosure in future filings to include the amount of interest payments
you expect on debt for the periods presented as required by
Securities and Exchange Commission
April 27, 2005
Page 3
Item 303(a)(5)(ii)(A) of
Regulation S-K. Please include disclosure of the assumptions used to
calculate amounts included in the table where variable interest rates as
of the most recent balance sheet are used to compute the estimated
contractual interest rates.
In future filings, we will add a
new note (1) to the table which will disclose interest payments and
assumptions. In our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended March 31, 2005 (the “March 31, 2005 10-Q”), the note will be as
follows:
“(1) Not included in the
table above are interest payments calculated at the rates in effect at
March 31, 2005 for the twelve month periods ended March 31: 2006
– $4.1 million; 2007 – $3.9 million; 2008 – $3.7 million;
2009 – $3.2 million; and 2010 – $1.3
million.”
Item 8. Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data
4.
Please identify related party
transactions and amounts on the face of the financial statements in future
filings. See Rule 4-08(k) of Regulation
S-X.
In future filings we will
disclose related party transactions and amounts in our balance sheet,
income statement or statement of cash flows, as applicable.
Consolidated Balance Sheets,
page 39
5.
Please set forth separately
the amount related to your allowances for doubtful accounts on the face of
your balance sheet or in a note to your financial statements. Refer
to Rule 5-02.3 of Regulation S-X. In addition, please disclose
information related to allowance for doubtful accounts in Schedule II
– Valuation and Qualifying Accounts. Refer to Rules 5-04 and
12-09 of Regulation S-X.
In each of the years reported in
the financial statements in the 2004 10-K, we have analyzed our accounts
receivable based upon our policies for establishing allowances for
doubtful accounts. Based on that analysis, which particularly notes
the absence, historically, of any uncollected accounts receivable, we have
determined that no allowance for doubtful accounts is required or
appropriate. As a result of the foregoing, we do not believe that a
Schedule II disclosure is required. In response to comment 6, below,
in future filings we will add to the
Securities and Exchange Commission
April 27, 2005
Page 4
note, “Summary of Significant
Accounting Policies” in our financial statements a disclosure, under
the sub-heading “Receivables,” discussing our allowance.
Note 2. Summary of
Significant Accounting Policies
General
6.
Please disclose your
accounting policy and methodology used to estimate the allowance for
doubtful accounts. The description of the policy should identify the
factors that influenced your judgment including historical losses and
existing economic conditions and should also include a discussion of risk
elements relevant to particular categories or accounts
receivable.
In future filings, we will add
to Note 2, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in our financial
statements, under the sub-heading “Receivables,” disclosure of our
accounting policy and the methodology used to estimate our allowance for
doubtful accounts. In our March 31, 2005 10-Q, the disclosure will
appear in Note 2, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,”
as follows:
“Receivables
In
evaluating its allowance for possible losses, the Partnership performs
ongoing credit evaluations of its customers and adjusts credit limits
based upon payment history and the customer's credit information.
The Partnership extends credit on an unsecured basis to many of its energy
customers. At March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, the
Partnership's credit evaluation indicated that it has no need for an
allowance for possible losses.”
Principles of Consolidation,
page 44
7.
We note your statement that
your General Partner, Atlas America, controls the Operating
Partnership. Please explain to us your basis for consolidating in
your financial statements an entity in which you do not control.
Include in your response a discussion of the rights of the limited
partners and general partner and the relevant accounting literature.
Revise your disclosure to clarify the basis for your presentation
including the nature of the interests held by you, Atlas Pipeline.
In this regard, also support your presentation of the general partner’s
interest.
Securities and Exchange Commission
April 27, 2005
Page 5
As set forth in ARB 51,
paragraphs 1 and 2, there is a presumption that “consolidated
statements... are usually necessary for fair presentation” where
one company directly or indirectly has a “controlling financial
interest” in another, and that the condition for having a
controlling interest is “ownership of a majority voting
interest.” Paragraph 6 of ARB 51 points out that the assumption
behind consolidated statements is that “they represent the
financial position and operating results of a single business
enterprise.” With respect to the operating partnership, we note the
following:
•
We own substantially all –
98.9899% - of the economic interest in the operating
partnership.
•
As limited partner of the
operating partnership, pursuant to Section 11.2(b) of the operating
partnership agreement, we may remove the general partner of the operating
partnership at will.
•
As limited partner of the
operating partnership, pursuant to Section 7.3, we must approve
significant actions of the operating partnership, such as amendment of its
agreement of limited partnership, sale of all or substantially all of its
assets and mergers or consolidations.
•
Our general partner is and, as
described below, must be the same entity as the general partner of the
operating partnership, and must manage the operating partnership as a
fiduciary for our benefit. Moreover, under Section 11.2(a) of the
agreement of limited partnership of the operating partnership, if our
general partner is removed or withdraws, our new general partner
automatically becomes the general partner of the operating
partnership. Similarly, under Section 7.3(a), the general partner
may not transfer its general partner interest in the operating partnership
without our consent.
•
We established the operating
partnership as the entity through which we operate our natural gas
pipeline business.
•
The agreement of limited
partnership of the operating partnership is keyed to our operations and
actions. See, for example, Sections 4.2, 6.2(c) and 11.2(a) of the
operating partnership agreement.
Consequently, we concluded that
we have the controlling financial interest in the operating partnership
and that we operate together with the operating
partnership
Securities and Exchange Commission
April 27, 2005
Page 6
as a single business
enterprise. See SOP 78-9, paragraph 09. As a result, we
concluded that we must consolidate the operating partnership into our
financial statements pursuant to ARB 51. Moreover, we concluded
that, due to the unitary nature of the general partner’s interest in us
and the operating partnership as set forth in the fourth bullet above, the
general partner's interest should be presented as a 2% interest in the
consolidated entity.
To clarify the basis of our
presentation, in future filings we will modify the discussion in Note 2,
“Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” under the
sub-heading “Principles of Consolidation,” to add, following
the phrase “the Operating Partnership,” the phrase “, in
which the Partnership has the controlling financial
interest”.
Property and Equipment, page
45
8.
You disclose that gas
gathering, transmission and processing facilities are depreciated over 15
to 40 years using the straight-line method. Please disclose the
weighted useful lives related to each category and amount of depreciable
asset class.
Pursuant to conversations with
the staff, in future filings we will revise Note 2, “Summary of
Significant Accounting Policies,” under the subheading “Property,
Plant and Equipment" to add a table that provides a more detailed
statement of the depreciable asset classes and to provide either the
specific life used for a particular class, or to provide the narrow range
of useful lives pertaining to the class. The disclosure, which will
be in the March 31, 2005 10-Q as the last paragraph of Note 5, will be as
follows:
“Depreciation is provided
for in amounts sufficient to relate the cost of depreciable assets to
operations over the estimated useful lives of the assets using the
straight-line method. The estimated service lives of property and
equipment are principally as follows:
Pipelines, processing and
compression facilities
15-20 years
Right of
ways-Appalachia
20 years
Right of
ways-Mid-Continent
40 years
Buildings
40 years
Furniture and
equipment
3-7 years
Other
3-10
years”
Securities and Exchange Commission
April 27, 2005
Page 7
9.
Please tell us your accounting
policy for planned major maintenance projects. If you accrue for
these costs prior to the periods in which they are actually incurred,
please disclose this fact. If you accrue for these costs in advance,
also disclose the nature of each planned maintenance project, when you
begin accruing the related costs, the amounts that you accrued in each
period related to each project in advance of the costs actually being
incurred, and the related amounts still to be
accrued.
We expense normal, on-going
maintenance expenditures in the period in which they occur. We have
not had extraordinary maintenance expenditures to date. In general,
however, we capitalize costs relating to the improvement or refurbishment
of our systems and depreciate them over the expected useful life of the
improvement or refurbishment. We do not accrue for maintenance costs
before the period they are actually incurred.
Revenue Recognition, page
46
10.
Please help us understand the
physical flow of natural gas and volume measurement in relation to the
revenue recognition policy with respect to your operations in the
Appalachian Basin area and Mid-Continent area. In this regard,
explain at what point revenue is recognized in the gas transmission
process versus the point at which natural gas is transferred to your
facilities.
In our Appalachian operations, we
recognize revenue when the natural gas flows through the meter at the
interface of our gathering systems and the pipeline designated by the
purchaser or, in the case of direct deliveries, at the meter at the
interface between our gathering systems and the purchaser’s flow
line