SEC Company Response from UNITED AMERICAN CORP (CIK 0001096688) — Oct 6, 2005
UNITED AMERICAN CORP (CIK 0001096688)
Date: Oct. 6, 2005 · CIK: 0001096688 · Accession: 0001255294-05-000619
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm
mainbodyresponseletter
Cane
Clark LLP
3273
E. Warm Springs
Las
Vegas, NV 89120
Kyleen
E. Cane*
Bryan
R. Clark^
Chad
Wiener+
Scott
P. Doney~
Telephone:
702-312-6255
Facsimile:
702-944-7100
Email:
bclark@caneclark.com
October
6, 2005
UNITED
STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION-Division
of Corporation Finance
100
F.
Street NE
Washington,
D.C. 20549
Mail
Stop
4561
ATTENTION:
Eric McPhee
Re: United
American Corporation
Form
10-K for the year ended December 31,
2004
Filed
April 29, 2005
File
No. 0-27621
We
write
on behalf of United American Corporation (the “Company”) in response to Staff's
letter of July 26, 2005 by Daniel L. Gordon, Branch Chief at the United States
Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) regarding the
above-referenced annual report on Form 10-KSB filed April 29, 2005 (the “Comment
Letter”). On behalf of the Company, we are submitting this response to the
Comment Letter. The Company will endeavor to supplement this correspondence
with
a response to all comments not addressed herein when the Company is able to
respond completely and accurately. The delay in responding fully to all comments
is attributable to the Company dismissing its former auditor and engaging a
new
auditor coupled with its efforts to remedy errors in the Company’s prior
disclosure.
The
factual information provided herein relating to the Company has been made
available to us by the Company. Paragraph numbering used for each response
corresponds to the numbering used in the Comment Letter.
Sale
of Teliphone Inc.
7.
Please
tell us the details of the sale of Teliphone Inc. Provide all relevant
terms of the sale, and indicate how youhave accounted for the sale.
Additionally, please tell us when you will report this transaction
on Form
8-K, or the reasons you believe you are not required to do so.
In
response to this comment, the Company reported in its quarterly report on Form
10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005 that it initially proposed to spin-off
its subsidiary Teliphone, Inc. (“Teliphone”). In April 2005, the Company was
presented with an opportunity where Teliphone would enter into a merger with
a
wholly-owned subsidiary of OSK Capital II Corp. (“OSK”), a public reporting
company under Section 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. As a result
*Licensed
Nevada, California, Washington and Hawaii Bars;
^
Nevada,
Colorado and District of Columbia Bars
+
Illinois, and Wisconsin State Bars ~Nevada
of
this
opportunity, the Company did not present its original proposal to the
shareholders for their consideration and approval. On April 28, 2005, OSK
completed its acquisition of Teliphone, pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of
Merger and Reorganization. At the effective time of the merger, OSK acquired
all
of the outstanding shares of Teliphone and Teliphone merged with OSK II
Acquisition Corp., a Florida corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of OSK
Capital II, Corp. Following the merger, Teliphone was the surviving corporation.
OSK issued 25,000,000 common shares in exchange for all of the issued and
outstanding shares of Teliphone and these shares of OSK were issued to the
Teliphone shareholders on a pro rata basis. The Company owned 100 common shares
of the 104 common shares issued and outstanding in Teliphone. As a result,
the
Company received 24,038,462 shares of OSK. Following the effectiveness of the
merger, OSK had 30,426,000 common shares issued and outstanding. Consequently,
Teliphone became a wholly owned subsidiary of OSK and OSK is currently a
majority-owned subsidiary of the Company. The Company’s current proposal is to
spin-off its majority-owned subsidiary, OSK. The Company intends to present
this
proposal to its shareholders for their consideration and approval, but has
not
done so at the present time.
Purchase
of Interest in Dialek Telecom
8.
Please
tell us the details of your transaction to purchase a majority interest
in
Dialek Telecom. Provide all revevant terms of the transaction, and
indicate how you have accounted for the purchase. Additionally, please
tell us when you will report this transaction on Form 8-K, or the
reasons
you believe you are not required to do so.
In
response to this comment, the Company reported in its quarterly report on Form
10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005 that the proposed transaction set
forth in a letter of intent with Dialek Telecom executed on May 16, 2005 was
subject to the final negotiation and execution of a definitive agreement. The
Company further disclosed that the parties were unable to reach an agreement
on
acceptable terms and a definitive agreement was never consummated. The Company
did not report this transaction on Form 8-K because the parties never executed
a
definitive agreement.
If
you
have any questions regarding this comment letter, please feel free to contact
me
at
702-312-6255.
Sincerely,
/s/
Bryan
R. Clark
Bryan R. Clark