SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Probe Scores Topics IPO Watchlist Monthly Activity About API

SEC Company Response from PEC SOLUTIONS INC (CIK 0001103013) — May 19, 2005

PEC SOLUTIONS INC (CIK 0001103013)
Date: May 19, 2005 · CIK: 0001103013 · Accession: 0000950133-05-002337

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

Referenced dates: May 16, 2005

Date
May 19, 2005
Author
/s/ Edwin M. Martin, Jr.
Form
CORRESP
Company
PEC SOLUTIONS INC (CIK 0001103013)

Letter

Division of Corporation Finance Office of Mergers & Acquisitions Washington, DC 20549-0303 PEC Solutions, Inc. Schedules 14D-9 filed April 27, 29 and May 3 and 9, 2005

Re:

Dear Mr. Duchovny:

This letter is submitted on behalf of PEC Solutions, Inc. (the “Registrant”) in response to comments set forth in your letter dated May 16, 2005.

The responses to your comment letter are set forth below, with each paragraph numbered to correspond to the numbered comments set forth in your letter. For your convenience, your comments have been reproduced below in bold-face type, together with the responses of the Registrant.

Schedules 14D-9 filed April 27 and 29, 2005

1. The April 27 and April 29 filings bear an incorrect EDGAR header identification tag. Please confirm that the registrant understands its preliminary communications should have been filed under cover of Schedule 14D-9-C and that communications subsequent to or that otherwise amend the solicitation/recommendation statement will appear, as they did on May under cover of Schedule 14D-9/A.

The Registrant understands that its preliminary communications should have been filed under cover of Schedule 14D-9-C and that further filings will be made under cover of Schedule 14D-9/A.

2. With respect to the April 27 and April 29 filings, we note that the legend required under Instruction 3 to Rule 14d-9(a)(2) is not included. To the extent your communications are delivered to security holders, please confirm that in future communications you will include the legend.

The Registrant hereby confirms that if these communications are delivered to security holders, future communications will include the required legend.

Daniel F. Duchovny, Esq.

May 19, 2005

Page 2

Schedule 14D-9 filed May 3, 2005

The Solicitation or Recommendation — Background — Page 3

3. Please provide us a supplemental copy of any written materials presented by JPMorgan to your board, including any presented on April 22.

Enclosed herewith please find a supplemental copy of the written materials presented by JPMorgan to Registrant’s board, including the presentation from April 22, 2005.

The Solicitation or Recommendation — Reasons — Page 8

4. Please describe briefly the “risks attendant to achieving the goals of PEC’s strategic plan.”

The Registrant has revised Schedule 14D-9/A to briefly describe the risks attendant to achieving the goals of its strategic plan.

5. Please explain the registrant’s use of brackets in the second line of paragraph 7 in this section or remove the brackets, as necessary.

The brackets are a typographical error and will be removed.

6. The disclosure indicates that the board, in determining whether or not to approve the offer and the merger, considered factors. Item 1012(b) of Regulation M-A, however, specifically requires that reasons be cited to explain why the board is making a favorable recommendation. Please revise this section to clarify which of the enumerated factors are in fact reasons, not simply factors or benefits, in support of the board’s decision to recommend the offer to security holders.

The Registrant has amended the disclosure to clarify the reasons in support of the board’s decision to recommend the offer to security holders.

Annex I

7. We note that you provided the information required by Rule 14f -1 as an annex to the Schedule 14D-9 but did not file it separately on Edgar. Please tell us what consideration you gave to filing the document on Edgar using the header tag “SC14F1.” Refer to the Edgar Filer Manual, which is available on our website at www.sec.gov.

The Registrant will file the document separately.

Daniel F. Duchovny, Esq.

May 19, 2005

Page 3

Closing Information

The information provided in response to your comments does not materially change the information that the Registrant has provided to its securities holders.

On behalf of the Registrant, the Registrant hereby acknowledges that:

• The Registrant is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in the filings;

• The staff comments or changes to disclosure in response to staff comments in the filings reviewed by the staff do not foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to the filing; and

• The Registrant may not assert staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of the United States.

We hope that these responses have addressed your concerns. Should you have any questions, please contact me at (703) 773-4213.

Sincerely,
/s/ Edwin M. Martin, Jr.

Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm

corresp

[Letterhead of DLA Piper Rudnick Gray Cary US LLP]

May 19, 2005

Daniel F. Duchovny, Esq.

Division of Corporation Finance

Office of Mergers & Acquisitions

460 Fifth Street, N.W.

Washington, DC 20549-0303

    Re:

    PEC Solutions, Inc.

    Schedules 14D-9 filed April 27, 29 and May 3 and 9, 2005

Dear Mr. Duchovny:

     This letter is submitted on behalf of PEC Solutions, Inc. (the “Registrant”) in response to
comments set forth in your letter dated May 16, 2005.

     The responses to your comment letter are set forth below, with each paragraph numbered to
correspond to the numbered comments set forth in your letter. For your convenience, your comments
have been reproduced below in bold-face type, together with the responses of the Registrant.

     Schedules 14D-9 filed April 27 and 29, 2005

     1. The April 27 and April 29 filings bear an incorrect EDGAR header identification tag. Please
confirm that the registrant understands its preliminary communications should have been filed under
cover of Schedule 14D-9-C and that communications subsequent to or that otherwise amend the
solicitation/recommendation statement will appear, as they did on May under cover of Schedule
14D-9/A.

     The Registrant understands that its preliminary communications should have been filed under
cover of Schedule 14D-9-C and that further filings will be made under cover of Schedule 14D-9/A.

     2. With respect to the April 27 and April 29 filings, we note that the legend required under
Instruction 3 to Rule 14d-9(a)(2) is not included. To the extent your communications are delivered
to security holders, please confirm that in future communications you will include the legend.

     The Registrant hereby confirms that if these communications are delivered to security holders,
future communications will include the required legend.

Daniel F. Duchovny, Esq.

May 19, 2005

Page 2

     Schedule 14D-9 filed May 3, 2005

     The Solicitation or Recommendation — Background — Page 3

     3. Please provide us a supplemental copy of any written materials presented by JPMorgan to
your board, including any presented on April 22.

     Enclosed herewith please find a supplemental copy of the written materials presented by
JPMorgan to Registrant’s board, including the presentation from April 22, 2005.

     The Solicitation or Recommendation — Reasons — Page 8

     4. Please describe briefly the “risks attendant to achieving the goals of PEC’s strategic
plan.”

     The Registrant has revised Schedule 14D-9/A to briefly describe the risks attendant to
achieving the goals of its strategic plan.

     5. Please explain the registrant’s use of brackets in the second line of paragraph 7 in this
section or remove the brackets, as necessary.

     The brackets are a typographical error and will be removed.

     6. The disclosure indicates that the board, in determining whether or not to approve the
offer and the merger, considered factors. Item 1012(b) of Regulation M-A, however, specifically
requires that reasons be cited to explain why the board is making a favorable recommendation.
Please revise this section to clarify which of the enumerated factors are in fact
reasons, not simply factors or benefits, in support of the board’s decision to recommend
the offer to security holders.

     The Registrant has amended the disclosure to clarify the reasons in support of the board’s
decision to recommend the offer to security holders.

     Annex I

     7. We note that you provided the information required by Rule 14f -1 as an annex to the
Schedule 14D-9 but did not file it separately on Edgar. Please tell us what consideration you
gave to filing the document on Edgar using the header tag “SC14F1.” Refer to the Edgar Filer
Manual, which is available on our website at www.sec.gov.

     The Registrant will file the document separately.

Daniel F. Duchovny, Esq.

May 19, 2005

Page 3

     Closing Information

     The information provided in response to your comments does not materially change the
information that the Registrant has provided to its securities holders.

     On behalf of the Registrant, the Registrant hereby acknowledges that:

    •
    The Registrant is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in
the filings;

    •
    The staff comments or changes to disclosure in response to staff comments in the
filings reviewed by the staff do not foreclose the Commission from taking any
action with respect to the filing; and

    •
    The Registrant may not assert staff comments as a defense in any proceeding
initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of the
United States.

     We hope that these responses have addressed your concerns. Should you have any questions,
please contact me at (703) 773-4213.

Sincerely,

/s/ Edwin M. Martin, Jr.

Edwin M. Martin, Jr.