SEC Company Response from LIMELIGHT MEDIA GROUP INC (CIK 0001104161) — Oct 4, 2005
LIMELIGHT MEDIA GROUP INC (CIK 0001104161)
Date: Oct. 4, 2005 · CIK: 0001104161 · Accession: 0001140361-05-007937
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
File numbers found in text: 000-29107
Referenced dates: May 5, 2005
Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm
Limelight Media Group Inc Corresp 10-03-2005
Limelight
Media Group, Inc.
1300
North Northlake Way
Seattle,
WA 98103-8919
800-544-3343
October
3, 2005
Mr.
Steven Jacobs
Accounting
Branch Chief
Securities
and Exchange Commission
Washington,
DC 20549
Re:
Limelight
Media Group, Inc.
Form
10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004
File
No. 000-29107
Dear
Mr.
Jacobs:
We
have
received the Staff’s letter dated May 5, 2005. In connection with
our
Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 (the “Annual
Report”), we hereby file by EDGAR transmission this letter containing our
responses to the Staff letter’s furnishing the comments of the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) on the Annual Report.
The
numbered responses below correspond to the numbered paragraphs of the Staff’s
letter. Capitalized terms not otherwise defined in this letter have the meanings
ascribed to them in the Annual Report.
Responses
1.
As indicated in the section titled “Stock-based Compensation” under note 1 to
our financial statements included in the Annual Report, shares of our common
stock issued as compensation for services are valued using the market price
of
the stock on the date of the related services agreement. We feel this is
consistent with Issue 1 of EITF 96-18 which states “Equity instruments issued or
granted for services to non-employees are measured at the fair value of the
shares as of the earlier of 1) The date at which a commitment for performance
by
the counterparty to earn the equity instruments is reached or 2) The date at
which the counterparty’s performance is complete.”
We
also
recognize that EITF 96-18 draws the consensus that the fair value of the equity
instrument would be recognized in the same period(s) and in the same manner
(that is, capitalize versus expense) as if the enterprise had paid cash for
the
goods or services. Under such circumstances where stock is issued for future
services, we would recognize prepaid services recorded as a contra equity line
item in the balance sheet. That item would be amortized in accordance with
the
terms of the related agreement. Please be advised, however, that no such prepaid
services existed as of December 31, 2004, and that all stock issued was issued
for services performed. Additionally, all shares of our common stock issued
in
exchange for services are fully vested and non-forfeitable at time of
issuance.
We
recognize, with respect to your comment, the need to add more discussion to
the
Stock-based Compensation note as discussed in the preceding paragraphs and
will
do so in the financial statements included in our Quarterly Report on Form
10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005.
2.
We issued a total of 3,125,000 additional shares of our common stock in
January 2005 to the parties involved in the 2004 stock purchase agreement as
a
result of the adjustment mechanism set forth in such agreement. In connection
with such issuances, for the year ended December 31, 2004, , we accrued a
liability of $100,000, included in “Due to Related Parties” on our balance
sheet, and incurred an expense of $100,000, included in “Consulting Fees” on our
balance sheet. Such issuances were disclosed in the sections titled
“Management’s Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation” and “Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management”. Further, we discussed
the related party transactions generally in Note 5 and item 4 of Note 19
(Subsequent Events) to our financial statements included in the Annual
Report.
3.
None of the shares sold for cash were issued to officers and employees of our
company. The shares were sold at a negotiated purchase price per share that
we
believe represented the “fair value” of such shares at the time of issuance. In
determining the “fair value”, we considered the following factors:
·
the
market price of the freely-tradable, unrestricted shares of our common
stock on the date of each issuance;
·
the
issued shares were “restricted securities,” as defined in the Securities
Act of 1933, and could not be offered and sold in the public markets
for a
period of at least one year;
·
the
trading market for our common stock has been volatile and is subject
to
wide swings; and
·
an
investment in our common stock is speculative and involves significant
risk
We
acknowledge that (i) we are responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the
disclosure in our filings; (ii) Staff comments or changes to disclosure in
response to Staff comments do not foreclose the Commission from taking any
action with respect to our filings; and (iii) we may not assert any Staff
comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any
person under the federal securities laws of the United States.
We
believe we have fully responded to the comments of the Commission. If the
Commission has any questions or further comments with respect to the Annual
Report, we respectfully request that such comments be directed to the
undersigned as soon as practicable. The undersigned would welcome the
opportunity to discuss such questions or comments (or discuss further any of
our
responses) in advance of any written response of the Commission.
Very
truly yours,
/s/
David V. Lott
David
V. Lott
Chief
Executive Officer
cc:
LL
Bradford & Co.