SEC Comment Letter for MATERION Corp (MTRN) (CIK 0001104657) (MTRN) — Sep 5, 2012
MATERION Corp (MTRN) (CIK 0001104657)
Date: Sept. 5, 2012 · CIK: 0001104657 · Accession: 0000000000-12-048231
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
Show Raw Text
September 5, 2012 Via E -mail Mr. John D. Grampa Senior Vice President Finance and Chief Financial Officer Materion C orporation 6070 Parkland Blvd. Mayfield Hts., OH 44124 Re: Materion C orporation Form 10-K Filed February 29 , 2012 File No. 1-15885 Dear Mr. Grampa : We have reviewed your response dated August 16, 2012 and have the following comments. Please respond to this letter within ten business days by providing the requested information, or by advising us when you will provide the requested response. If you do not believe our comments apply to your facts and circumstances, please tell us why in your response. After reviewing the information you prov ide in response to these comments, we may have additional comments. Form 10 -K for the year ended December 31, 20 11 Note J – Contingencies and Commitments, page 83 1. In response to prior comment 8, you address environmental loss contingencies and state you “do not believe that it is reasonably possible that the resolution of these sites will be at a cost that is materially in excess of the current reserves.” Please provide a similar statement in your future footnote disclosure that addresses ASC 4 50-20-50. The language in your proposed future disclosure regarding sites where investigative work and work plan development are substantially complete does not clearly state there is no reasonable possibility that a material additional loss may have been incurred. Mr. John D. Grampa Materion Corporation September 5, 2012 Page 2 Form 10 -Q for the period ended June 29, 2012 Management’s Discussion and Analysis, page 13 2. We note your disclosure throughout that the demand from a number of key markets, especially and including consumer electronics, remained soft durin g the second quarter of 2012. On page 17, you disclose that sales of precious metal products for applications within consumer electronics were lower in the second quarter and half of 2012 compared to the same periods of 2011, and the overall demand has “r emained sluggish.” We also note from page 19 that you experienced weaker demand from the automotive electronics market and that there were no sales of beryllium hydroxide in the second quarter. However, in each of these instances, you do not provide a di scussion of the macro - and micro -economic forces and trends that you believe had a material impact on demand for these products, which resulted in an adverse impact on your results of operations. Therefore, please tell us and revise future filings as appl icable to discuss the prominent applications within each market, and identify and discuss the macro - and micro -economic factors impacting those applications particular to that period. For example, we note from the recent investor presentations included i n the Forms 8 -K filed August 6, and 17, 2012, the “key drivers” in the consumer electronics market include smartphone growth, tablet computers and LEDs, and miniaturization. It would appear that the market for smartphones and tablet computers has not yet reached saturation. In this particular instance, you should discuss why demand has remained weak, despite perceptions to the contrary. You may contact Jenn Do at (202) 551-3743 , or me at (202) 551 -3355 if you have questions regarding comments on the financial statements and related matters. Sincerely, /s/ Terence O ’Brien Terence O’Brien Branch Chief