SEC Company Response from AMERICAN BEVERAGE CO AMBEV (CIK 0001113172) — Oct 21, 2005
AMERICAN BEVERAGE CO AMBEV (CIK 0001113172)
Date: Oct. 21, 2005 · CIK: 0001113172 · Accession: 0000950157-05-000646
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
File numbers found in text: 001-15194
Referenced dates: September 12, 2005
Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm
Correspondence
October 21,
2005
Via
Facsimile (202) 772-9202 and EDGAR
Ms.
Donna
Di Silvio
Staff
Accountant
Division
of Corporation Finance
United
States Securities and Exchange Commission
100
F.
Street, N.E.
Washington,
DC 20549
Re:
American
Beverage Company - AmBev.
Form
20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004
File
No. 001-15194
Dear
Ms.
Di Silvio:
This
letter responds to your letter dated September 12, 2005 (the “Comment Letter”),
providing comments of the staff of the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission (the “Staff”) on the Annual Report on Form 20-F of American
Beverage Company - AmBev (“AmBev” or the “Company”) for the year ended
December 31, 2004, filed by AmBev on July 1, 2005, as amended by its
Amendment No. 1, filed by AmBev on August 3, 2005 (AmBev’s “2004 Annual
Report”).
For
your
convenience, each comment from the Comment Letter has been reproduced below,
followed by AmBev’s response to such comment.
Controls
and Procedures, page 144
1.
Please
clarify your disclosure in future filings and tell us if your officers
concluded that disclosure controls and procedures were effective
as of the
end of the period covered by the report. Refer to Item 15(a) of Form
20-F.
We
confirm
to the Staff that our chief executive officers and chief financial officer
have
concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were, as of the end of
the
period covered by the report, (i) effective in ensuring that information
required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the U.S.
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the “Exchange Act”) is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the
Commission’s rules and forms and (ii) effective in ensuring that information to
be
1
disclosed
in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated
and
communicated to our management, including our principal executive and principal
financial officers, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
In
response to the Staff’s comment, we undertake to include such disclosure in
future filings.
Financial
Statements
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, page F-2
2.
Please
tell us where the report from the independent accounting firm was
issued
and indicate the place of issuance in future filings. See Rule 2-02(a)
of
Regulation S-X.
The
report
of our independent registered public accounting firm included on page F-2 of
our
2004 Annual Report was issued in São Paulo, Brazil. In response to the Staff’s
comment, our independent registered public accounting firm will undertake to
include such disclosure in future filings.
Note
2.
Summary of Our Significant Accounting Policies, page F-16
ab)
Proportionally consolidated financial statements, page F-23
3.
Please
advise or revise future filings to include summarized cash flow
information resulting from operating, financing and investing activities
relating to your pro rata interest in Quinsa. See Item 17 (c)(2)(vii)
of
Form 20-F.
The
condensed balance sheet and statement of operations presented on pages F-72
and
73 of our 2004 Annual Report were prepared under US GAAP and reflect the
Company’s investment in Quinsa under the equity method of accounting. The
Statement of Cash Flows presented on pages F-11 and 12 of our 2004 Annual Report
has been prepared in accordance with IAS 7 as allowed by Item 17 (c)(2)(iii)
of
Form 20-F. The summarized cash flow information resulting from operating,
investing and financing activities related to our pro rata interest in Quinsa
for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2004 are as follows:
Cash
flows from:
2003
2004
(R$
in millions)
Operating
Activities
168.4
323.5
Investing
Activities
(172.9)
(151.8)
Financing
Activities
(89.9)
(40.6)
Since
the
Company did not acquire its interest in Quinsa until 2003, there is no
applicable disclosure to be made for 2002. In response to the Staff’s comment,
we undertake to include such disclosure in future filings.
2
Note
11. Loans and Financing, page F-32
4.
Disclosure
beginning on page 73 indicates there are restrictions on the distribution
and transfer of funds. Please tell us and disclose what amounts of
retained earnings or net income is restricted as required by Rule
4-08(e).
Also, please tell us what consideration was given to providing Schedule
I
pursuant to Rule 5-04 of Regulation S-X. In your response please
include,
if appropriate, how you determined the restricted net assets of the
registrant’s consolidated net assets does not exceed 25% of the
registrant’s consolidated net assets as defined in Rule 4-08(e)(3) of
Regulation S-X.
The
disclosure intends to inform that certain of Labatt’s debt agreements contain
clauses that restrict the transfer of funds to related companies, including
AmBev, if a certain leverage ratio is reached. As disclosed in the first
paragraph of page 76 of our 2004 Annual Report, as of the date of the end
of the period covered by such report, there were no amounts of retained earnings
or net income of Labatt that are restricted. It was not our intent to have
readers infer that such restrictions exist by making the mentioned
disclosure.
We
supplementally disclose that the Company has no other restrictions on the
payment of dividends, except for the customary restrictions imposed by Brazilian
Corporate Law. The Company has distributed all of the results of operations
of
2004 and currently has appropriated R$208.7 million and R$225.0 million as
Legal
and Statutory Investments Reserves, respectively, in accordance with Brazilian
Corporate Law and as disclosed on page F-7 of our 2004 Annual Report. There
are
no undistributed earnings of 50 percent or less owned persons accounted for
by
the equity method included in consolidated retained earnings of the Company
and
no restricted net assets. Consequently, the Company deemed the disclosures
set
forth in Schedule I pursuant to Rule 5-04 of Regulation S-X to be
unnecessary.
Note
24. Summary of Principal Differences between Brazilian GAAP and US GAAP, page
F-58 (a)(i) Supplementary inflation restatement in 1996 and 1997 for US
GAAP
5.
We
note inflation accounting was discontinued effective January 1996
under
Brazilian GAAP and two years later under US GAAP. As a result additional
inflation restatement adjustments are reflected in the two-year period
ended December 31, 1997. Please expand your disclosure to clarify
the
subsequent adjustments to shareholders equity under US GAAP at December
31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 and show us what your disclosures will look
like
revised.
The
disclosure in Note 24(a)(i) to our financial statements aims to inform the
users
of the financial statements that for US GAAP purposes Brazil did not
cease
3
being
a
highly inflationary economy until December 31, 1997 and accordingly, the Company
continued to record the effects of inflation on property, plant and equipment,
investments, deferred charges (together denominated “Permanent Assets”) and
shareholders’ equity from January 1, 1996 to December 31, 1997. The amounts
reflect the carrying amount of the original adjustment, net of
depreciation.
The
US
GAAP income adjustments represent the annual depreciation of the restatements
of
fixed assets, which resulted from the inflation accounting adjustments applied
during 1996 and 1997.
In
response to the Staff’s comment, we undertake to revise the second paragraph of
Note 24(a)(i) in future filings to include the clarifications set forth
above.
(v)
Business combinations, page F-60
6.
We
note the Labatt Transaction was accounted for as an acquisition for
both
Brazilian and US GAAP reporting and accounted for as a pooling of
interest
and purchase, respectively. Please tell us what consideration you
gave to
providing pre-combination financial statements pursuant to Rule 3-05
of
Regulation S-X of Labatt acquired on August 27, 2004. Please include
in
your response your evaluation of
significance.
The
Company did not consider necessary providing pre-combination financial
statements of Labatt acquired on August 27, 2004, pursuant to Rule 3-05 of
Regulation S-X. The Company respectfully understands that the financial
statements of an acquired business or of a business to be acquired that are
significant are required in a registration statement. Financial statements
of a
business acquired or to be acquired are not required in annual reports to
shareholders on Form 20-F.
7.
On
page 24 you disclose that the US GAAP reporting for the acquisition
of
Labatt by AmBev was based on the substantive participating rights
that
FAHZ enjoys under the AmBev Shareholders’ Agreement. Please clarify for us
the substantive participating rights of FAHZ upon which you based
the US
GAAP accounting and why these rights determined the appropriate
accounting.
Summary
Accounting Analysis
As
of
August 27, 2004, when the InBev-AmBev transactions were completed (please refer
to pages 23-25 of the 2004 Annual Report), InBev held a 68.6% voting interest
and a 49.8% economic interest in AmBev. The Company analyzed the factors in
paragraph 17 of FAS 141 (Business Combinations) to determine if
4
InBev
was
the accounting acquirer of AmBev. In assessing the criteria set forth in
paragraph 17, the Company also considered the guidance in EITF 96-16 (Investor’s
Accounting for an Interest when the Investor has a Majority of the Voting
Interest but the Minority Shareholder or Shareholders Have Certain Approval
or
Veto Rights) to determine whether the approval rights accorded the Fundação
Antonio e Helena Zerrener Instituição Nacional de Beneficência
(“FAHZ”)
represented substantive participating rights. Based on the analysis of the
AmBev
Shareholders’ Agreement, dated July 1, 1999, as amended, the Company concluded
that the FAHZ has substantive participating rights (see below, section
“Substantive Participating Rights”) in relation to AmBev that enable it to
effectively participate in significant decisions that would be expected to
be
made in the ordinary course of business. Based on this, the Company concluded
that a step-up of AmBev’s assets and liabilities was not appropriate. Rather,
AmBev had issued its shares to acquire 99.9% of the capital stock of Labatt
ApS,
and Labbatt ApS should be accounted for at fair value. AmBev began consolidating
Labatt as from August 27, 2004.
Substantive
Participating Rights
The
FAHZ
and InBev Holding Brasil S.A., an indirect subsidiary of InBev S.A./N.V. (“InBev
Brasil”), held as of the date of the 2004 Annual Report shares of AmBev common
stock that represent approximately 86.5% of the total voting power of AmBev’s
capital stock, and approximately 70.92% of the total voting power of AmBev’s
capital stock is subject to AmBev’s Shareholders Agreement.
According
to AmBev’s Shareholders’ Agreement, the FAHZ, Interbrew International B.V. and
AmBrew S.A. (both of which are indirect subsidiaries of InBev
S.A./N.V.)1
must
unanimously approve the following fundamental matters, among others, that the
Company concluded represent substantive participating rights:
●
approval
of the annual investment budget of AmBev and/or any of its subsidiaries
when the amount of the investments exceed 8.7% of net sales of AmBev
foreseen for the same fiscal year;
●
designation,
dismissal and substitution of the Chief Executive Officers of
AmBev;
●
approval
of or amendment to the remuneration policy for the Board of Directors
and
of the executive board of AmBev, as well as of its
subsidiaries;
1
On
July 28, 2005, InBev Brasil was merged into AmBev. As a result, the AmBev
shares owned by InBev Brasil were canceled, and AmBev issued the same amount
of
shares to AmBrew S.A. and to Interbrew International B.V. (which were the
shareholders of InBev Brasil prior to the aforementioned merger into
AmBev).
5
●
approval
of stock ownership plans for the managers and employees of AmBev
and/or
its subsidiaries;
●
the
incurrence by AmBev and/or any of its subsidiaries of a debt transaction
that results in a net debt/equity ratio greater than
1.5;
●
the
execution, amendment, termination, renewal or cancellation of any
contracts, agreements or the like involving the registered or deposited
trademarks of AmBev or its
subsidiaries;
●
the
extension of loans or the offer of guarantees of any kind by AmBev
and/or
any of its subsidiaries to any third parties in an amount greater
than 1%
of AmBev’s shareholders’ equity as set forth in the last audited balance
sheet prepared in accordance with Brazilian GAAP, except in favor
of
employees of AmB