SEC Company Response from WINSONIC DIGITAL MEDIA GROUP LTD (CIK 0001120411) — Oct 21, 2005
WINSONIC DIGITAL MEDIA GROUP LTD (CIK 0001120411)
Date: Oct. 21, 2005 · CIK: 0001120411 · Accession: 0001144204-05-032385
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
Referenced dates: September 15, 2005
Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm
WINSONIC
DIGITAL MEDIA GROUP, LTD
260
Peachtree Street, Suite 2200
Atlanta,
GA 30303
October
21, 2005
Mr.
Steven Jacobs
Branch
Chief
Division
of Corporation Finance
Securities
Exchange Commission
100
F
Street, N.W.
Washington,
D.C. 20549
RE:
Winsonic
Digital Media Group, Ltd.
File No.
0-32231
Gentlemen:
In
response to the Staff’s Comment Letter dated September 15, 2005, on behalf of
the issuer Winsonic Digital Media Group, Ltd. (the “Company”). I am hereby
acknowledging that:
1.
The
Company has revised Item 8A Controls and Procedures, page 26 to add the
following; “Rule 13a-15 (e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, requires
that disclosure controls and procedures be disclosed by an issuer in the reports
that it files or submits. The Act requires information to be accumulated and
communicated to the issuer’s management as appropriate to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure.
The
following are the results of the procedures adhered to regarding Winsonic
Digital Media Group, Ltd. (a development stage company), yielding the following
adjustments and disclosures made to the prior year ended December 31,
2003.
A.
Management
was diligent to review each of the Company’s balance sheet accounts as of
December 31, 2004. As a result of such review we determined that
two loans
to the Company with combined principal balances of $148,000 as of
December
31, 2003, had no stated interest rates attached. Therefore, upon
review
with DeJoya & Company, our independent auditors, Management recorded
imputed interest expense at 6% for $2,127, in accordance with the
accounting principle of conservatism. The loan payable balances as
of
December 31, 2003 were also appropriately
increased.
B.
The
Company undertook an organizational restructure with the merger of
Winsonic Holdings, Ltd. and Winsonic Digital Cable Systems Network
with
Media and Entertainiment.com, Inc., thus creating Winsonic Digital
Media
Group, Ltd. The circumstances and transactions of the merger, initiated
in
2003, were thoroughly reviewed. The merger was considered a capital
transaction in substance, rather than a business combination, resulting
in
a reverse acquisition for accounting purposes, thereby yielding no
recording of goodwill, and called for the proper recording of issuance
of
6,004,200 common stock shares to the founder and CEO in 2003. Also,
as
mentioned in Note 1 - Organization and Purpose (on page F-7), the
Company
considered SAB Topic 4C in disclosing that stockholders deficit and
loss
per share were retroactively recasted using historical data from
Winsonic.
The entry to record par value of $6,004 was a credit to common stock
and
debit to related party-selling, general and administrative expenses
in
2003.
C.
Equity
transactions, including warrants, paid-in capital, and common stock
transactions of the Company were reviewed in detail to ensure proper
recording of stockholders deficit. During our review of warrants,
paid-in
capital, and common stock transactions, it was noted that the Company
in
the previous year had incorrectly capitalized a stock issuance for
services, rather than expensing the services. The Company has now
recorded
and disclosed $275,000 as consulting expense in 2003, and reduced
the
asset by the same amount. The accounting for Stockholders Deficit
regarding this transaction was correct and remained
unchanged.
Management,
in agreement with the Company’s new independent public accounting firm, De Joya
& Company decided that given the complexity of the organization’s
restructure, and the fact that the Company is a development stage company,
it
was appropriate due diligence to review all balance sheet accounts in detail.
Management’s due diligence in it’s review procedures and disclosure practices
contributed to the detection of the three prior year adjustments, and
restatement of the financial statements for and as of the year ended December
31, 2003.
Each
prior period adjustment and related disclosure was appropriately confirmed
as
correct via a review with the previous auditors, Chavez and Koch, as evidenced
in their opinion of their Report of Independent Public Registered Accounting
Firm, dated August 16, 2005, filed with the Company’s Form 10-KSB.”
2.
The
Company’s auditors, De Joya & Company, have revised their audit report to
disclose the activity related to the September 10, 2002 (inception) through
December 31, 2004. In it, the firm has added, “We did not audit the financial
statements of Winsonic Digital Media Group, Ltd. as of December 31, 2003 and
2002. Those statements were audited by other auditors whose report has been
furnished to us, and our opinion, insofar as it relates to the amounts included
in the period ending December 31, 2003 and 2002, is based solely on the report
of the other auditors.”
3.
The
Company has revised Note 1 - Organization and Purpose, on page F-7 to state
that
“The Company considered SAB Topic 4C, which states that a capital structure
change to a stock dividend, stock split or reverse split occurs after the date
of the latest reported balance sheet but before the release of the financial
statements or the effective date of the registration statement, whichever is
later, requires retroactively recasting of shares outstanding for stockholders’
equity and earnings per share. Therefore, the balances on the Statement of
Stockholders’ Deficit as of December 31, 2004 and as of December 31, 2003
(Restated) as shown on page F-3, include historical data of Winsonic Acquisition
Sub, Inc. beginning on September 10, 2002 (inception date). Likewise, the net
loss per basic and diluted common share calculation on the Statement of
Operations for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 (Restated) include
historical data of Winsonic Acquisition Sub, Inc. beginning on September 10,
2002 (inception date).”
4.
The
Company has revised Note 10 - Convertible Debentures on page F-18 to state
that
“The financials have been adjusted to comply with Par. 6 of EITF 98-5, as well
as EITF 00-27 and APB 14. After consulting with our auditor as well as outside
sources, the company has addressed the treatment of the convertible debt and
detachable warrants. The company initially determined the relative fair value
between the convertible debt and the detachable warrants. After allocating
a
portion of the proceeds to the detached warrants (based on relative fair
values), the convertible debt and the detached warrants were recorded. The
company then evaluated whether the embedded conversion option within the debt
instrument was beneficial (had intrinsic value) to the holder. The effective
conversion price (that is, the allocated proceeds divided by the number of
shares to be received on conversion) based on the proceeds was determined.
Both
the total debt discount immediately after the initial accounting was performed,
as well as the beneficial conversion feature was expensed on the income
statement. The financial statements of December 31, 2004, as well as the
respective notes to the financials, will be adjusted accordingly and filed
with
out amended 10KSB.
The
relative fair value of the warrants determined by Black Scholes on the date
of
issuance was $1,080, 078. The relative fair value of the convertible debt at
date of issuance was $1,222,500 (based on the number of shares it was
convertible into multiplied by the stock price of $1.05 on the date of
issuance).
The
total
of the relative fair values is $2,302,578 ($1,080,078 for warrants plus
$1,222,500 for debt). So the warrants are 46.91% of the fair value and debt
is
53.09% of the fair value.
Multiplying
the percentages by the proceeds of $815,000 says that $382,295 is the amount
“allocated” to the warrants (0.4691 * $815,000) and $432,705 is the amount
“allocated” to the debt (0.5309 * $815,000).
The
debt
discount is then the $815,000 of proceeds less $432,705 of fair value equals
$382,295.
When
you
divide the relative fair value of the debt of $432, 705 by the number of shares
convertible 1,164,286, the result is the “effective conversion price” of
$0.3716. If you subtract the effective conversion price from the fair market
value on the date of issuance of $1.05, you get a beneficial conversion feature
of $0.68 ($1.05 less $0.3716). Multiplying the number of the shares by the
beneficial conversion feature yields a beneficial conversion feature value
of
$789,795 ($0.68 multiplied by 1,164,286).
5.
The
Company has revised Note 10 - Convertible Debentures on page F-18 to correct
the
due date on the promissory notes. The Note 10 on page F-18 has been changed
to
read “Twenty-one convertible subordinated promissory notes at 6% annual
interest, due on December 15, 2005,
convertible into shares of common stock at any time prior to maturity.”
6.
See
attached signature pages via PDF,
The
undersigned further acknowledges that:
·
The
Company is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure
in
the filing; and
·
Staff
Comments or changes to disclosure in response to staff comments do
not
foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to the
filing; and the Company may not assert staff comments as a defense
in any
proceeding initiated by the commission or any person under federal
securities laws of the United
States.
Very
truly yours,
Winsonic Digital Media Group, Ltd.
By:
/s/ Winston
Johnson
Winston
Johnson, Chairman / CEO