SEC Company Response from BANK MUTUAL CORP (CIK 0001123270) — Jun 15, 2005
BANK MUTUAL CORP (CIK 0001123270)
Date: June 15, 2005 · CIK: 0001123270 · Accession: 0000950137-05-007386
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
File numbers found in text: 000-31207
Referenced dates: June 8, 2005
Letter
VIA EDGAR Securities and Exchange Commission RE: Bank Mutual Corporation (“BKMU”) Commission File No. 000-31207 Extension Discussion
Dear Mr. Walker:
This letter is to confirm my discussion yesterday with John Spitz of the Commission staff with respect to your comment letter dated June 8, 2005, addressed to Michael T. Crowley, Jr. of BKMU, and an extension of the date for response until June 28, 2005.
As I discussed with Mr. Spitz, we request that the date for the BKMU response to your letter be extended to June 28. The comment letter went to an incorrect fax number and did not reach Mr. Crowley’s desk until late on the 10th. One officer whose input is necessary for a response was on vacation until today and BKMU’s chief financial officer will not be returning until Thursday. In addition, because the origins of program participation were by a savings bank that BKMU acquired five years ago, it may be time-consuming to retrieve related records.
Based on my discussion with Mr. Spitz, I understand that the Commission staff is agreeable to this extension, but he asked that my request be confirmed in writing. Please let me know if you have any questions or if my understanding is incorrect.
Very truly yours,
QUARLES
& BRADY llp
Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm
corresp
Writer’s Direct Dial: 414.277.5345
Writer’s Fax: 414.978.8945
E-Mail: kvh@quarles.com
June 15, 2005
VIA EDGAR
Mr. Donald Walker
Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Judiciary Plaza
Washington DC 20549
RE:
Bank Mutual Corporation (“BKMU”)
Commission File No. 000-31207
Extension Discussion
Dear Mr. Walker:
This letter is to confirm my discussion yesterday with John Spitz of the Commission staff with
respect to your comment letter dated June 8, 2005, addressed to Michael T. Crowley, Jr. of BKMU,
and an extension of the date for response until June 28, 2005.
As I discussed with Mr. Spitz, we request that the date for the BKMU response to your letter
be extended to June 28. The comment letter went to an incorrect fax number and did not reach Mr.
Crowley’s desk until late on the 10th. One officer whose input is necessary for a response was on
vacation until today and BKMU’s chief financial officer will not be returning until Thursday. In
addition, because the origins of program participation were by a savings bank that BKMU acquired
five years ago, it may be time-consuming to retrieve related records.
Based on my discussion with Mr. Spitz, I understand that the Commission staff is agreeable to
this extension, but he asked that my request be confirmed in writing. Please let me know if you
have any questions or if my understanding is incorrect.
Very truly yours,
QUARLES
& BRADY llp
Kenneth V. Hallett
KVH:smj
cc: Mr. Michael T. Crowley, Jr.