SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Probe Scores Topics IPO Watchlist Monthly Activity About API

SEC Company Response from GSK (GSK) — Dec 8, 2008

GSK plc
Date: Dec. 8, 2008 · CIK: 0001131399 · Accession: 0000950123-08-017115

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

Date
December 8, 2008
Author
Benet O’Reilly
Form
CORRESP
Company
GSK plc

Letter

VIA EDGAR CORRESPONDENCE AND FEDEX Office of Mergers and Acquisitions Securities and Exchange Commission Genelabs Technologies, Inc. Amendment No. 2 to Schedule TO-T filed December 3, 2008 by Gemstone Acquisition Corporation and GlaxoSmithKline plc File No. 5-42078

Dear Ms. Duru:

On behalf of GlaxoSmithKline plc (“GSK”), SmithKline Beecham Corporation (“SKB”) and Gemstone Acquisition Corporation (“Purchaser”), we have set forth below a response to the comment of the staff (the “Staff”) of the Securities and Exchange Commission contained in its letter to us dated December 4, 2008 with respect to the above-referenced filing.

For your convenience, the text of the Staff’s comment is set forth below in italics followed by the response. GSK, SKB and Purchaser are concurrently filing Amendment No. 3 to the Schedule TO (“Amendment No. 3”) via EDGAR, four copies of which are enclosed herewith for your convenience. Capitalized terms used but not defined in this letter have the meanings ascribed to them in the Offer to Purchase unless otherwise indicated.

Mellissa Campbell Duru

Page 2

December 8, 2008

Schedule TO

1. We note your response to prior comment 2 and reissue the comment. Your assertion that SmithKline Beecham Corporation has not been acting independently is not seemingly dispositive of whether SmithKline Beecham Corporation has been acting as a co-bidder given the nature and extent of its role in the tender offer. We note, for example, that the parties to the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated October 29, 2008 were SmithKline Beecham Corporation, Gemstone Acquisition Corporation and Genelabs Technologies, Inc. Similarly, SmithKline Beecham Corporation, Gemstone Acquisition Corporation and certain executive officers and directors of Genelabs Technologies, Inc. were parties to a Tender and Shareholder Support Agreement executed on October 29, 2008. Additionally, it would appear that SmithKline Beecham Corporation may be a co-bidder based on the actions that SmithKline Beecham Corporation could cause its subsidiary Gemstone Acquisition Corporation to take in order to effect the short-form merger and the potential $57 million that SmithKline Beecham could contribute to purchase shares tendered in the offer. Finally, your response has not provided an adequate assessment of why the information required pursuant to Instruction C of Schedule TO would not be material given SmithKline Beecham Corporation’s level of involvement in the offer. Please revise or advise.

Revised disclosure has been included on the cover page, signature page and pages 2-7 of Amendment No. 3 to add SKB as a bidder in response to the Staff’s comment.

If you have any questions or require any additional information with respect to the above, please do not hesitate to contact me by telephone at (212) 225-2746 or by fax at (212) 225-3999.

Sincerely,
Benet O’Reilly

Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm

LETTER TO THE S.E.C.

    Writer’s Direct Dial: (212) 225-2746

    E-Mail: boreilly@cgsh.com

    December 8, 2008

VIA EDGAR CORRESPONDENCE AND FEDEX

Mellissa Campbell Duru

Attorney Advisor

Office of Mergers and Acquisitions

Securities and Exchange Commission

Washington D.C. 20549-0303

    Re:

    Genelabs Technologies, Inc.

Amendment No. 2 to Schedule TO-T filed December 3, 2008 by Gemstone

Acquisition Corporation and GlaxoSmithKline plc

File No. 5-42078

Dear Ms. Duru:

          On behalf of GlaxoSmithKline plc (“GSK”), SmithKline Beecham Corporation
(“SKB”) and Gemstone Acquisition Corporation (“Purchaser”), we have set forth below
a response to the comment of the staff (the “Staff”) of the Securities and Exchange
Commission contained in its letter to us dated December 4, 2008 with respect to the
above-referenced filing.

          For your convenience, the text of the Staff’s comment is set forth below in italics followed
by the response. GSK, SKB and Purchaser are concurrently filing Amendment No. 3 to the Schedule TO
(“Amendment No. 3”) via EDGAR, four copies of which are enclosed herewith for your
convenience. Capitalized terms used but not defined in this letter have the meanings ascribed to
them in the Offer to Purchase unless otherwise indicated.

    Mellissa Campbell Duru

    Page 2

    December 8, 2008

Schedule TO

          1. We note your response to prior comment 2 and reissue the comment. Your assertion that
SmithKline Beecham Corporation has not been acting independently is not seemingly dispositive of
whether SmithKline Beecham Corporation has been acting as a co-bidder given the nature and extent
of its role in the tender offer. We note, for example, that the parties to the Agreement and Plan
of Merger dated October 29, 2008 were SmithKline Beecham
Corporation, Gemstone Acquisition Corporation and
Genelabs Technologies, Inc. Similarly, SmithKline Beecham Corporation, Gemstone Acquisition
Corporation and certain executive officers and directors of Genelabs Technologies, Inc. were
parties to a Tender and Shareholder Support Agreement executed on October 29, 2008. Additionally,
it would appear that SmithKline Beecham Corporation may be a co-bidder based on the actions that
SmithKline Beecham Corporation could cause its subsidiary Gemstone Acquisition Corporation to take
in order to effect the short-form merger and the potential $57 million that SmithKline Beecham
could contribute to purchase shares tendered in the offer. Finally, your response has not provided
an adequate assessment of why the information required pursuant to Instruction C of Schedule TO
would not be material given SmithKline Beecham Corporation’s level of involvement in the offer.
Please revise or advise.

          Revised
disclosure has been included on the cover page, signature page and
pages 2-7 of
Amendment No. 3 to add SKB as a bidder in response to the Staff’s comment.

          If you have any questions or require any additional information with respect to the above,
please do not hesitate to contact me by telephone at (212) 225-2746 or by fax at (212) 225-3999.

Sincerely,

Benet O’Reilly

cc:     Carol G. Ashe