SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Probe Scores Topics IPO Watchlist Monthly Activity About API

SEC Company Response from GALECTIN THERAPEUTICS INC (GALT) (CIK 0001133416) (GALT) — Sep 16, 2005

GALECTIN THERAPEUTICS INC (GALT) (CIK 0001133416)
Date: Sept. 16, 2005 · CIK: 0001133416 · Accession: 0001193125-05-186534

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

Sentiment
Urgency
Document Type
Confidence
SEC Posture
Company Posture

Summary

Reasoning

Referenced dates: August 26, 2005

Date
September 16, 2005
Author
/s/ Carl L. Lueders
Form
CORRESP
Company
GALECTIN THERAPEUTICS INC (GALT) (CIK 0001133416)

Letter

Senior Assistant Chief Accountant Division of Corporation Finance – Mail Stop 6010 United States Securities and Exchange Commission Washington, D.C. 20549

Dear Mr. Rosenberg:

This letter responds to the questions presented to Dr. David Platt, Chief Executive Officer of Pro-Pharmaceuticals, Inc., in your letter dated August 26, 2005 concerning our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the “Form 10-K”). For convenience, we have restated the applicable portion of each question and provided a response immediately below.

Question 1.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, page 21

Please provide to us the following information for each of your major research and development projects in disclosure type format to allow us to address the adequacy of your disclosure. If you feel that the information is already disclosed, please point us to the specific locations within your document where each bullet is addressed:

•

The costs incurred during each period presented and to date on the project;

•

The nature, timing and estimated costs of the efforts necessary to complete the project;

•

The anticipated completion dates; and finally

•

The period in which material net cash inflows from significant projects are expected to commence.

Regarding the first point, if you do not maintain any research and development costs by project, disclose that fact and explain why management does not maintain and evaluate research and development costs by project. Provide other quantitative or qualitative disclosure that indicates the amount of the company’s resources being used on the project.

Regarding the second and third points, disclose the amount or range of estimated costs and timing to complete the phase in process and each future phase. To the extent that information is not estimable, disclose those facts and circumstances indicating the uncertainties that preclude you from making a reasonable estimate.

Securities and Exchange Commission

September 16, 2005

Page 2

RESPONSE:

For your convenience, we have attached as Exhibit 1 to this letter text in pertinent pages referred to below from Item 7 of the Form 10-K.

All of our research and development (“R&D”) activities to date are related to one project, referred to as DAVANAT in the Form 10-K, which is the sole project identified in “Research and Development Expenses” under “Results of Operations” for each period presented in the report (pp. 23 – 24). In future filings we will revise our overview in MD&A to read as follows:

“We currently have one drug candidate—DAVANAT—in clinical development. To commercialize our current (and future) drug candidates, we will be required to successfully complete pre-clinical studies and clinical trials to obtain regulatory approvals.”

When we begin the next substantial R&D project, we plan to disclose our R&D expenses on a project-by-project basis. Note the reference to future development of a “pipeline of additional drug candidates” in “Results of Operations” (p. 24).

The Form 10-K discloses the R&D costs incurred by period with respect to DAVANAT (pp. 23 – 24). In “Research and Development” for the 2003 fiscal year, we disclose that the increase in R&D costs related to the clinical trials begun that year, and, similarly, in the corresponding section for 2004 we disclose the increase in costs for Phase I incurred in that year (approximately $380,000) and that the “remainder” was for pre-clinical product development and costs related to clinical trials of DAVANAT. Vendor expenditures in 2004 (approximately $695,000) related to DAVANAT are disclosed under “Liquidity and Capital Resources” (p. 25).

To date we have divided our R&D costs for DAVANAT between those reasonably allocable to internal “overhead” expenses, and those paid to outside vendors we engage e.g., to perform pre-clinical experiments, manufacture product for clinical trials, and conduct clinical trials. We have itemized the components for the allocations in the Form 10-K (p. 23), but have not detailed the allocations. We did not provide such detail in this or prior reports because we had only one drug candidate and are still a relatively early stage company. We propose to continue our method of allocation, but in future reports to disclose (in tabular format by reporting period) the amounts in our discussion of R&D expenses that are allocable to internal “overhead” and for expenditures paid to vendors, and in the case of the latter with a “breakdown” of expenditures relative to pre-clinical activities and clinical trials. We also propose to clarify Item 7 in future reports so that the cross reference to Item 1 is stated in a manner to enable a reader to understand the uncertainties inherent in our business that make future projections and estimates difficult.

Securities and Exchange Commission

September 16, 2005

Page 3

While DAVANAT is in clinical development, we believe that any estimates of future costs, anticipated completion dates or expectations as to timing of material net cash inflows are subject to numerous contingencies and uncertainties (e.g., number of clinical trials undertaken, number of patient participants, timing of patient recruitment, results of toxicity and efficacy testing, regulatory agency response to data submission reports, change in the regulatory environment, etc.) such that reasonable estimates cannot be provided. We believe that any estimate of future costs, completion dates or cash inflows that we might provide would require so many assumptions as to render it not meaningful to investors. Nonetheless, as our company develops allowing us to reduce the range of uncertainties, we intend to provide estimates where appropriate.

Question 2.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, page F-8

9. Commitments and Contingencies, page F-19

Research and Development Commitments, page F-19

We note your inclusion of $1.463 million in “Clinical trial and related scientific contracts” in your Contractual Obligations Table on page 25. Please clarify for us how this obligation relates to the contracts described in this note. If it is related to these contracts also clarify why you did not disclose the dollar amounts of these obligations in this note.

Securities and Exchange Commission

September 16, 2005

Page 4

RESPONSE:

Financial Accounting Standard 47 (“FAS 47”) states the requirements for reporting commitments and contingencies in financial statements. Footnote 9 (“Commitments and Contingencies”) to our financial statements contained in the Form 10-K meets the disclosure requirements of FAS 47. Attached as Exhibit 2 to this letter is the pertinent excerpt from FAS 47.

The line item “Clinical trial and related scientific contracts” in the Contractual Obligations Table in Item 7 (p. 25) goes beyond the FAS criteria in that it includes purchase obligations that are cancelable on 30 days notice or have a duration of less than one year and hence are not “unconditional purchase obligations,” as defined in FAS 47. We disclosed such additional purchase obligations in Item 7 for purposes of transparency. We propose in future filings to note in the Contractual Obligations Table in Item 7 that some commitments are cancelable or have short duration, thereby enabling readers to reconcile this table more readily with the “Commitments and Contingencies” footnote in the financial statements.

As requested in your letter, Pro-Pharmaceuticals, Inc. hereby acknowledges that:

•

the company is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in its filings;

•

staff comments or changes to disclosure in response to staff comments do not foreclose the Commission from taking any action in response to the filing; and

•

the company may not assert staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of the United States.

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call the undersigned at (617) 559-0033.

Sincerely,
/s/ Carl L. Lueders

Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm

SEC RESPONSE LETTER

 [Pro-Pharmaceuticals, Inc. letterhead]

 189 Wells Avenue

 Newton, Massachusetts 02459

 (617) 559-0033

Mr. James B. Rosenberg

September 16, 2005

Senior Assistant Chief Accountant

Division of Corporation Finance – Mail Stop 6010

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

Washington, D.C. 20549

 Dear Mr. Rosenberg:

 This letter responds to the questions presented to Dr. David Platt, Chief
Executive Officer of Pro-Pharmaceuticals, Inc., in your letter dated August 26, 2005 concerning our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the “Form 10-K”). For convenience, we have restated the applicable portion
of each question and provided a response immediately below.

 Question 1.

 Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations, page 21

 Please provide to us
the following information for each of your major research and development projects in disclosure type format to allow us to address the adequacy of your disclosure. If you feel that the information is already disclosed, please point us to the
specific locations within your document where each bullet is addressed:

•

The costs incurred during each period presented and to date on the project;

•

The nature, timing and estimated costs of the efforts necessary to complete the project;

•

The anticipated completion dates; and finally

•

The period in which material net cash inflows from significant projects are expected to commence.

 Regarding the first point, if you do not maintain any research and development costs by project, disclose that fact and explain why
management does not maintain and evaluate research and development costs by project. Provide other quantitative or qualitative disclosure that indicates the amount of the company’s resources being used on the project.

 Regarding the second and third points, disclose the amount or range of estimated costs and
timing to complete the phase in process and each future phase. To the extent that information is not estimable, disclose those facts and circumstances indicating the uncertainties that preclude you from making a reasonable estimate.

 Securities and Exchange Commission

 September 16, 2005

 Page 2

 RESPONSE:

 For your convenience, we have attached as Exhibit 1 to this letter text in pertinent pages referred to below from Item 7 of the Form 10-K.

 All of our research and development (“R&D”) activities to date are related to one project, referred to as DAVANAT in the Form
10-K, which is the sole project identified in “Research and Development Expenses” under “Results of Operations” for each period presented in the report (pp. 23 – 24). In future filings we will revise our overview in MD&A
to read as follows:

 “We currently have one drug
candidate—DAVANAT—in clinical development. To commercialize our current (and future) drug candidates, we will be required to successfully complete pre-clinical studies and clinical trials to obtain regulatory approvals.”

 When we begin the next substantial R&D project, we plan to disclose our R&D
expenses on a project-by-project basis. Note the reference to future development of a “pipeline of additional drug candidates” in “Results of Operations” (p. 24).

 The Form 10-K discloses the R&D costs incurred by period with respect to DAVANAT (pp. 23 – 24). In “Research and
Development” for the 2003 fiscal year, we disclose that the increase in R&D costs related to the clinical trials begun that year, and, similarly, in the corresponding section for 2004 we disclose the increase in costs for Phase I incurred
in that year (approximately $380,000) and that the “remainder” was for pre-clinical product development and costs related to clinical trials of DAVANAT. Vendor expenditures in 2004 (approximately $695,000) related to DAVANAT are disclosed
under “Liquidity and Capital Resources” (p. 25).

 To date we have
divided our R&D costs for DAVANAT between those reasonably allocable to internal “overhead” expenses, and those paid to outside vendors we engage e.g., to perform pre-clinical experiments, manufacture product for clinical trials, and
conduct clinical trials. We have itemized the components for the allocations in the Form 10-K (p. 23), but have not detailed the allocations. We did not provide such detail in this or prior reports because we had only one drug candidate and are
still a relatively early stage company. We propose to continue our method of allocation, but in future reports to disclose (in tabular format by reporting period) the amounts in our discussion of R&D expenses that are allocable to internal
“overhead” and for expenditures paid to vendors, and in the case of the latter with a “breakdown” of expenditures relative to pre-clinical activities and clinical trials. We also propose to clarify Item 7 in future reports so
that the cross reference to Item 1 is stated in a manner to enable a reader to understand the uncertainties inherent in our business that make future projections and estimates difficult.

 Securities and Exchange Commission

 September 16, 2005

 Page 3

 While DAVANAT is in clinical development, we believe that any estimates of future costs, anticipated completion dates or expectations as to timing of material net cash
inflows are subject to numerous contingencies and uncertainties (e.g., number of clinical trials undertaken, number of patient participants, timing of patient recruitment, results of toxicity and efficacy testing, regulatory agency response to data
submission reports, change in the regulatory environment, etc.) such that reasonable estimates cannot be provided. We believe that any estimate of future costs, completion dates or cash inflows that we might provide would require so many assumptions
as to render it not meaningful to investors. Nonetheless, as our company develops allowing us to reduce the range of uncertainties, we intend to provide estimates where appropriate.

 Question 2.

 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, page F-8

 9. Commitments and Contingencies, page F-19

 Research and Development Commitments, page F-19

 We note your inclusion of $1.463 million in “Clinical trial and related scientific contracts” in your Contractual Obligations Table on page 25. Please
clarify for us how this obligation relates to the contracts described in this note. If it is related to these contracts also clarify why you did not disclose the dollar amounts of these obligations in this note.

 Securities and Exchange Commission

 September 16, 2005

 Page 4

 RESPONSE:

 Financial Accounting Standard 47 (“FAS 47”) states the requirements for reporting commitments and contingencies in financial statements. Footnote 9 (“Commitments and Contingencies”) to our
financial statements contained in the Form 10-K meets the disclosure requirements of FAS 47. Attached as Exhibit 2 to this letter is the pertinent excerpt from FAS 47.

 The line item “Clinical trial and related scientific contracts” in the Contractual Obligations Table in Item 7 (p. 25) goes beyond
the FAS criteria in that it includes purchase obligations that are cancelable on 30 days notice or have a duration of less than one year and hence are not “unconditional purchase obligations,” as defined in FAS 47. We disclosed such
additional purchase obligations in Item 7 for purposes of transparency. We propose in future filings to note in the Contractual Obligations Table in Item 7 that some commitments are cancelable or have short duration, thereby enabling readers to
reconcile this table more readily with the “Commitments and Contingencies” footnote in the financial statements.

 As requested in your letter, Pro-Pharmaceuticals, Inc. hereby acknowledges that:

•

the company is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in its filings;

•

staff comments or changes to disclosure in response to staff comments do not foreclose the Commission from taking any action in response to the filing; and

•

the company may not assert staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of the United States.

 If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call the
undersigned at (617) 559-0033.

 Sincerely,

 /s/ Carl L. Lueders

Carl L. Lueders

 Chief Financial Officer

 Securities and Exchange Commission

 September 16, 2005

 Page 5

 Exhibit I

 [Page 21 of the 2004 Form 10-K]

 Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (in thousands, except share and per share data)

 Overview

 We are a development-stage company engaged in research and development of drug technologies to enable targeted delivery of chemotherapy drugs. We intend
initially to “reformulate” existing widely used chemotherapies with our proprietary carbohydrate compounds. We believe our technology may increase the body’s tolerance to these toxic drugs by targeting the delivery directly to
cancerous cells and increasing the efficacy, thereby creating a preferable treatment to existing oncology regimens. Our goal is to develop and commercialize a new generation of reformulated drugs. For additional information, please see “Item 1.
Business — Business of Pro-Pharmaceuticals.”

 All of
our drug candidates are currently in pre-clinical and clinical development. To commercialize our drug candidates, we will be required to successfully complete pre-clinical studies and clinical trials to obtain regulatory approvals. We do not expect
to file a New Drug Application (“NDA”) for a drug candidate before 2006, even if development of our drug candidates continues successfully. Any delay in obtaining or failure to obtain required approvals will materially adversely affect our
ability to generate revenues from commercial sales relating to our drug candidates. We expect our sources of funding for the next several years to come from finance transactions.

 *****

 [Page 23 of the 2004 Form 10-K]

 Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2004 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2003 (in thousands)

 Research and Development Expenses. Research and development expenses
were $3,042 in 2004 or an increase of 56% as compared to $1,950 incurred in 2003. Research and development expenses consist primarily of costs of clinical research organizations (CRO), clinical data management services, outsourcing product
development to chemical research laboratories regulatory and medical consultants, drug manufacturing for clinical trials, salaries, stock based compensation and other personnel related expenses. Of the $1,092 increase, approximately $380 was due to
Phase I clinical trials of DAVANAT®/5-FU and the
remainder was due to drug manufacturing for clinical trials, pre-clinical product development and CRO costs primarily for Phase II clinical trials.

 We began our Phase I clinical trial of DAVANAT® and DAVANAT®/5-FU in February 2003. Due to additional drug administration cycles, enrollment closed in January 2005. We completed the sixth and final cohort of the Phase I trial in March 2005 and
expect to issue a report of the final clinical results in the second quarter of 2005. We initiated our Phase II clinical trial of DAVANAT®/5-FU colorectal cancer patients in January 2004, and are currently completing our negotiations and contracts with clinical sites. We expect to begin
dosing patients in the second quarter of 2005 and expect Phase II to be completed in 2006. We continue to develop our pipeline of drug candidates. Accordingly, we expect that our research and development costs will increase in 2005 due to Phase II
clinical trial of DAVANAT®/5-FU and preparation for
Phase III combined with development of additional drug candidates.

 *****

 Securities and Exchange Commission

 September 16, 2005

 Page 6

 [Page 24 of the 2004 Form 10-K]

 Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2003 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2002 (in thousands)

 Research and Development Expenses. Research and development expenses
were $1,950 in 2003, or 32% higher than the $1,483 incurred in 2002. The increase reflects the costs to initiate and conduct the Phase I clinical trial of DAVANAT®/5-FU, which began in February 2003. We expect the Phase I trial to be completed in 2005. In 2004, we began a concurrent
Phase II clinical trial of DAVANAT®/5-FU. We are
continuing to develop our pipeline of additional drug candidates. Accordingly, we expect that our research and development costs will continue to increase in 2004 and thereafter and could comprise a higher percentage of our annual expenditures.

 *****

 [Page 25 of the 2004 Form 10-K]

 Liquidity and Capital Resources (in thousands)

 Net cash used in operations increased to $6,333 in 2004, from $4,152 in 2003 and $2,983 in
2002, respectively. The increased use of cash in operations is primarily due to the impact of a full year’s research and management costs for the Phase I clinical trial of approximately $380, drug manufacturing for clinical trials, pre-clinical
product development and CRO costs primarily for Phase II clinical trials of approximately $695.

 Exhibit II

 FAS 47 disclosure
requirement in the Financial Statements is for unconditional purchase obligations.

 FAS 47, Par. 6. “An unconditional purchase obligation is an obligation to transfer funds in the future for fixed or minimum amounts or quantities of goods or services at fixed or minimum prices (for example, as in take-or-pay contracts
or throughput contracts). An unconditional purchase obligation that has all of the following characteristics shall be disclosed in accordance with paragraph 7 (if not recorded on the purchaser’s balance sheet) or in accordance with paragraph
10(a) (if recorded on the purchaser’s balance sheet):

 a. Is
non-cancelable, or cancelable only

 (1) Upon the occurrence of some remote
contingency or

 (2) With the permission of the other party or

 (3) If a replacement agreement is signed between the same parties or

 (4) Upon payment of a penalty in an amount such that continuation of the agreement appears
reasonably assured

 b. Was negotiated as part of arranging financing for the
facilities that will provide the contracted goods or services or for costs related to those goods or services (for example, carrying costs for contracted goods)

 c. Has a remaining term in excess of one year”