SEC Comment Letter for Charlie's Holdings, Inc. (CHUC) (CIK 0001134765) (CHUC) — Feb 7, 2020
Charlie's Holdings, Inc. (CHUC) (CIK 0001134765)
Date: Feb. 7, 2020 · CIK: 0001134765 · Accession: 0000000000-20-001203
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
File numbers found in text: 333-232596
Show Raw Text
February 6, 2020
Brandon Stump
Chief Executive Officer
Charlie's Holdings, Inc.
1007 Brioso Drive
Costa Mesa, CA 92627
Re:Charlie's Holdings, Inc.
Amendment No. 3 to
Registration Statement on Form S-1
Filed January 22, 2020
File No. 333-232596
Dear Mr. Stump:
We have reviewed your amended registration statement and have the following
comments. In some of our comments, we may ask you to provide us with information so we
may better understand your disclosure.
Please respond to this letter by amending your registration statement and providing the
requested information. If you do not believe our comments apply to your facts and
circumstances or do not believe an amendment is appropriate, please tell us why in your
response.
After reviewing any amendment to your registration statement and the information you
provide in response to these comments, we may have additional comments. Unless we note
otherwise, our references to prior comments are to comments in our November 8, 2019 letter.
Amended Form S-1 filed January 22, 2020
Prospectus Summary, page 2
1.We note your response to our prior comment 1. Please reconcile your statement on the
first page of your prospectus summary that you "expect the cost associated with the
preparation and submission of these PTMAs will be approximately $.4 million" with your
response to us that you intend to submit "three PMTAs before the expiration of the grace
period, at an expected aggregate expense of approximately $4.44 million."
FirstName LastNameBrandon Stump
Comapany NameCharlie's Holdings, Inc.
February 6, 2020 Page 2
FirstName LastName
Brandon Stump
Charlie's Holdings, Inc.
February 6, 2020
Page 2
Risk Factors
Our Amended and Restated Bylaws designate courts within the state of Nevada as the sole and
exclusive forum... , page 18
2.We note your response to our prior comment 3. Please revise to clarify your
understanding that federal and state courts have concurrent jurisdiction over claims arising
under the Securities Act. Your current disclosure suggests that your exclusive forum
provision would not apply to Securities Act claims because federal courts have exclusive
jurisdiction over Securities Act claims. In making any revision continue to state whether
your exclusive forum provision would apply to Securities Act claims.
You may contact Effie Simpson at 202-551-3346 or Theresa Brillant at 202-551-3307 if
you have questions regarding comments on the financial statements and related matters. Please
contact Susan Block at 202-551-3210 or John Dana Brown at 202-551-3859 with any other
questions.
Sincerely,
Division of Corporation Finance
Office of Life Sciences