SEC Comment Letter for PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL INC (PFH, PRH, PRS, PRU) (CIK 0001137774) (PFH) — Aug 27, 2007
PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL INC (PFH, PRH, PRS, PRU) (CIK 0001137774)
Date: Aug. 27, 2007 · CIK: 0001137774 · Accession: 0000000000-07-041899
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
Show Raw Text
August 21, 2007 Mail Stop 6010 By U.S. Mail and facsimile to 973-802-8287 Prudential Financial, Inc. 751 Broad Street Newark, New Jersey 07102 Attn: Arthur F. Ryan, Chief Executive Officer Re: Prudential Financial, Inc. Definitive 14A Filed March 22, 2007 File No. 1-16707 Dear Mr. Ryan: We have limited our review of your definitive proxy statement to your executive compensation and other related disclosure a nd have the following comments. Our review of your filing is part of the Division’s focused review of executive compensation disclosure. Please understand that the purpose of our re view process is to assist you in your compliance with the applicable disclosure requirements and to enhance the overall disclosure in your filings. We look forward to working with you in these respects. We welcome any questions you may have about our comments or any other aspect of our review. Feel free to call me at the telephone number listed at the e nd of this letter. In some comments we have asked you to provide us with additional information so we may better understand your disclosure. Pl ease do so within the time frame set forth below. You should comply with the remain ing comments in all future filings, as applicable. Please confirm in writing that you will do so and also explain to us how you intend to comply. Please unders tand that after ou r review of all of your responses, we may raise additional comments. If you disagree with any of these commen ts, we will consider your explanation as to why our comment is inapplicable or a revisi on is unnecessary. Please be as detailed as necessary in your explanation. Arthur F. Ryan August 21, 2007 Page 2 Compensation of Directors, page 13 1. Please provide a footnote to the table which discloses the grant date fair value of each award made during the year. See Inst ruction to Item 402( k)(2)(iii)&(iv) of Regulation S-K. 2. Please reference the assumptions made in calculating the va luations using FAS 123R, as required by the Instruction to Item 402(k) to Regulation S-K. Process for Determining Executive Compensation, page 14 3. In your discussion of the compensation cons ultant, please disc lose the material elements of the instructions or direct ions the compensation committee gave the consultant. See Item 407(e)(3 )(iii) of Regulation S-K. Compensation Discussion and Analysis, page 16 Competitive Benchmarking, page 16 4. You state that you compare each execu tive’s compensation in relation to the median and the 75th percentile of the comparator group, while taking into account various factors such as Prudential’s si ze and performance within the peer group, the unique characteristics of the individual’s position and retention considerations. While you discuss Prudential’s performa nce, you do not discuss these other various factors. Also, on page 23, you st ate that named executive officers receive long-term incentives “based on an evalua tion of their individual performance, market pay position and retention consider ations.” As to each named executive officer, to the extent the other various f actors you mention materially affect the amount or type of compensation you paid, please discuss and disclose how these factors resulted in the compensati on elements and amounts for the named executive officers. Linking Compensation to Performance, page 16 5. We note that you have not provided a quant itative discussion of the terms of the necessary targets or performance objectiv es to be achieved in order for your executive officers to earn their incentiv e compensation. For example, you have not quantified the various ROE, AOI and E PS targets mentioned. Either disclose these targets or on a supplemental basis, provide us with a detailed analysis supporting your conclusion that the disclo sure of the target s would result in competitive harm such that the information could be excluded properly under Instruction 4 to Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K. Please note that to the extent disclosure of the quantitative or qualita tive performance-related factors would cause competitive harm, you are required to discuss how difficult it will be for you to achieve the target levels or other factors. Arthur F. Ryan August 21, 2007 Page 3 Annual Incentives, page 17 6. Please analyze the resultant annual comp ensation amounts of each of the named executive officers. For example, you me ntion individual contributions as being factor that determined compensation. Please explain this in more detail. 2006 Results and Compensation of Named Executive Officers, page 22 7. Please explain how each compensation element and your decisions regarding each element fit into the overall compensa tion decisions for the named executive officers and affect the Compensation Committee’s decisions regarding the elements and their amounts. Compensation of Named Executive Officers, page 24 8. Discuss the disparity among the various amounts you paid the named executive officers. Please respond to our comments by September 21, 2007, or tell us by that time when you will provide us with a response. We urge all persons who are responsible for the accuracy and adequacy of the disclosure in the filing to be certain that the filing includes all in formation required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and th at they have provided all information investors require for an informed invest ment decision. Since the company and its management are in possession of all facts re lating to a company’s disclosure, they are responsible for the accuracy and adequacy of the disclosures they have made. When you respond to our comments, please provide, in writing, a statement from the company acknowledging that: • the company is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in the filing; • staff comments or changes to disclo sure in response to comments do not foreclose the Commission from taking a ny action with respect to the filing; and • the company may not assert staff comme nts as a defense in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any pers on under the federal s ecurities laws of the United States. Arthur F. Ryan August 21, 2007 Page 4 In addition, please be advise d that the Division of Enfo rcement has access to all information you provide to the staff of the Di vision of Corporation Finance in connection with our review of your filing or in response to comments. Please contact me at (202) 551-3612 with any questions. Sincerely, Michael Reedich Special Counsel