SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Probe Scores Topics IPO Watchlist Monthly Activity About API

SEC Company Response from VOYAGER ONE INC (CIK 0001140300) — Jan 31, 2005

VOYAGER ONE INC (CIK 0001140300)
Date: Jan. 31, 2005 · CIK: 0001140300 · Accession: 0001019687-05-000215

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

Date
January 31, 2005
Author
Not clearly detected
Form
CORRESP
Company
VOYAGER ONE INC (CIK 0001140300)

Letter

VIA FACSIMILE: (202) 942-9648 ------------------------------ Securities and Exchange Commission Division of Corporation Finance Judicial Plaza 450 Fifth Street Washington, D.C. 20549-0404 Attention: David Ritenour Special Counsel

RE: VOYAGER ONE, INC. FORM SB-2, FILED ON AUGUST 26, 2004

Dear Mr. Ritenour:

On behalf of our client, Voyager One, Inc. ("Voyager" or the "Company"), we are filing today under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), amendment no. 3 to the Company's registration statement on Form SB-2. The amendment to Form SB-2 will be filed for the purpose of responding to comments contained in a letter from the Securities and Exchange Commission dated January 13, 2005.

In the hope of expediting the process of responding to the staff's comments, we have set forth below our responses to the staff's letter, including, wherever feasible, the text of revisions and additions to the SB-2. For ease of reference, we have included below the text of the staff's letter, and our responses are structured to correspond to the comment numbers from that letter. The Company has requested that we respond as follows to the staff's comments:

GENERAL -------

PROSPECTUS SUMMARY

1. PLEASE UPDATE YOUR DISCLOSURE TO THE EXTENT PRACTICAL, INCLUDING THE PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT MILESTONE TABLE THAT APPEARS ON PAGE 34 AND THE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION INFORMATION THAT APPEARS ON PAGE 44. PLEASE ALSO FILE AN UPDATED LEGALITY OPINION.

We have updated various disclosures throughout amendment no. 3 to the registration statement. These are reflected on the blackline version furnished with this response letter.

In particular, we have revised the product development milestone table on page 32 to read as follows: <PAGE> <TABLE>

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION January 31, 2005 Page 2

------------------ -------------------- ------------------- ----------------- -------------------- Product Engineering Product Requirements Development System Test Manufacturing ------------------ -------------------- ------------------- ----------------- -------------------- <S> <C> <C> <C> <C> EFS-4 2Q 2004 1Q 2005 2Q 2005 4Q 2005 ------------------ -------------------- ------------------- ----------------- -------------------- EFS-10 2Q 2005 3Q 2004 4Q 2005 1Q 2006 ------------------ -------------------- ------------------- ----------------- -------------------- EFS-18 4Q 2005 1Q 2006 2Q 2006 4Q 20064 ------------------ -------------------- ------------------- ----------------- --------------------

We have also revised the product development milestone table on page 32 to read as follows:

---------------- --------------- ---------------- --------------- -------------- ----------------- Product 2H 2004 1H 2005 2H 2005 1H 2006 2H 2006 ---------------- --------------- ---------------- --------------- -------------- ----------------- EFS-4 $120,000 $2,200,000 $1,100,000 -- -- ---------------- --------------- ---------------- --------------- -------------- ----------------- EFS-10 -- -- $1,400,000 $1,600,000 -- ---------------- --------------- ---------------- --------------- -------------- ----------------- EFS- 18 -- -- -- $700,000 $1,600,000 ---------------- --------------- ---------------- --------------- -------------- ----------------- Total $120,000 $2,200,000 $2,500,000 $2,300,000 $1,600,000 ---------------- --------------- ---------------- --------------- -------------- ----------------- </TABLE>

In addition, we have updated the Summary Compensation Table on page 42 and filed an updated legality opinion as Exhibit 5.1.

PROSPECTUS SUMMARY

2. WE NOTE YOUR RESPONSE TO COMMENT 1. WE ALSO NOTE THAT THE DISCLOSURES CONTAINED IN THE THIRD, FOURTH AND FIFTH SENTENCES OF THE FOURTH PARAGRAPH OF THE SUMMARY ALSO APPEAR ON PAGE 32. GIVEN THE DEVELOPMENT STAGE OF YOUR COMPANY, WE BELIEVE THAT THOSE DISCLOSURE ARE MORE APPROPRIATELY INCLUDED IN THE BODY OF THE PROSPECTUS RATHER THAN IN THE PROSPECTUS SUMMARY. ACCORDINGLY, PLEASE REVISE THE FOURTH PARAGRAPH OF THE SUMMARY TO DELETE THE THIRD, FOURTH AND FIFTH SENTENCES OF THAT PARAGRAPH.

In response to the staff's comment, we revised the fourth paragraph of the summary to delete duplicative sentences.

THE OFFERING

3. WE NOTE YOU RESPONSE TO COMMENT 4. WE ALSO NOTE THAT YOU ARE CONTINUING TO REGISTER UP TO 4,400,000 SHARES TO BE ISSUED UPON CONVERSION OF THE CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURES, WHICH REPRESENTS A CONVERSION PRICE OF $0.25 PER SHARE. THE NUMBER OF SHARES TO BE REGISTERED FOR RESALE MUST BE BASED ON A GOOD FAITH ESTIMATE OF THE NUMBER OF SHARES TO BE ISSUED UPON CONVERSION OF THE CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURES. BASED ON YOUR RESPONSE TO COMMENT 4, IT APPEARS THAT YOUR GOOD FAITH ESTIMATE OF THE CONVERSION PRICE MAY BE $2.50 PER SHARE. IF SO, THEN PLEASE REDUCE THE NUMBER OF SHARES THAT YOU REGISTERING FOR RESALE BY CORNELL CAPITAL PARTNERS AND TREY RESOURCES CONSISTENT WITH A $2.50 CONVERSION PRICE, AND REVISE AS APPROPRIATE TO ENSURE THAT THE DISCLOSURES THROUGH YOUR PROSPECTUS ARE CONSISTENT WITH A $2.50 PER SHARE CONVERSION PRICE. ALTERNATIVELY, IF YOUR GOOD FAITH ESTIMATE OF THE CONVERSION PRICE IS $0.25 PER SHARE, THEN THAT CONVERSION PRICE NEEDS TO BE USED THROUGHOUT THE PROSPECTUS, INCLUDING ON PAGE 8, 13, 15, 16, 20 AND 21.

<PAGE>

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION January 31, 2005 Page 3

The debentures are convertible at a price equal to the lower of (i) 150% of the lowest initial bid price of the common stock as submitted by a market maker and approved by the NASD and (ii) 50% of the lowest closing bid price of the common stock for the five trading days immediately preceding the conversion date. For purposes of determining beneficial ownership of our common stock in respect of convertible debentures, we have assumed throughout the prospectus a lowest closing bid price of $2.50 per share. The resulting holders' conversion price would be $1.25 per share (50% of the assumed $2.50 closing bid price). Accordingly, the holders' aggregate beneficial ownership of our common stock is calculated to be 880,000 shares (the aggregate $1,100,000 face value divided by the $1.25 assumed conversion price). Our shares do not yet trade on any exchange, and therefore we cannot know what the actual trading price will be. We have made a good faith estimate that the number of shares of our common stock needed upon conversion of the convertible debentures is 2,200,000 shares (250% of 880,000 shares beneficially owned).

We have revised the lead-in disclosures to the table on page 13 as well as footnotes (3) and (5) to that table for consistency with the foregoing. See also our response to comment 6, below.

SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION -----------------------------

4. PLEASE REVISE TO ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING:

a) EXPAND THE TABLE TO ALSO INCLUDE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS DATA FOR EACH OF THE FISCAL YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003 AND 2002, AND REVISE THE INTRODUCTORY PARAGRAPH TO SO INDICATE.

We have expanded the table on page 4 to include statement of operations data for each of the fiscal years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 and have revised our disclosures in the introductory paragraph on page 5 to read as follows:

"The following information was taken from Voyager One's financial statements since inception (June 28, 2002) to September 30, 2004 (unaudited) and the consolidated nine months ended September 30, 2004 (unaudited) and nine months ended September 30, 2003 (unaudited) which appear beginning on Page F-15 of this prospectus and the Silicon Film Technologies financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2003 (audited) and year ended December 31, 2002 (audited) which appear beginning on page F-2 of this prospectus. For a more detailed presentation refer to these financial statements."

b) INSTEAD OF THE DETAILED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND BALANCE SHEET DATA CURRENTLY PRESENTED, CONSIDER ONLY SHOWING MAJOR STATEMENT CAPTIONS SUCH, OPERATING EXPENSES, INTEREST EXPENSE, NET LOSS BEFORE TAXES, NET LOSS, NET LOSS PER SHARE, TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS, TOTAL ASSETS, TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES, LONG TERM DEBT, THE INDIVIDUAL COMPONENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY, TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY AND TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT).

We have revised the disclosures in the statement of operations data to show only the major statement captions of "total operating expenses and loss from operations," "interest expense," "net loss before taxes," "net loss," and "net loss per share," and revised the balance sheet data to show only the major statement captions of "total current assets," "total assets," "total current liabilities," "long term note payable," "preferred stock," "common stock," "additional paid-in capital," "deficit accumulated during development stage," "total stockholders' equity (deficit)" and "total liabilities and stockholders' equity (deficit)."

<PAGE>

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION January 31, 2005 Page 4

c) REMOVE THE "AUDITED" LABEL ABOVE ANY CAPTIONS, AS THAT LABEL MAY CONFUSE AN INVESTOR INTO BELIEVING THAT HE AUDITOR WAS ENGAGED TO AUDIT THE INFORMATION. RATHER INCLUDE A STATEMENT IN THE INTRODUCTORY PARAGRAPH TO INDICATE WHICH INFORMATION WAS DERIVED FROM THE AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND WHICH INFORMATION WAS DERIVED FROM THE UNAUDITED INTERIM FINANCIAL DATA.

We have deleted the "audited" labels above any captions to avoid confusion and have revised the introductory paragraph to read as follows:

"The following information was taken from Voyager One's financial statements since inception (June 28, 2002) to September 30, 2004 (unaudited) and the consolidated nine months ended September 30, 2004 (unaudited) and nine months ended September 30, 2003 (unaudited) which appear beginning on Page F-15 of this prospectus and the Silicon Film Technologies financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2003 (audited) and year ended December 31, 2002 (audited) which appear beginning on page F-2 of this prospectus. For a more detailed presentation refer to these financial statements. In management's opinion all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring items) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included."

d) REVISE THE INTRODUCTORY PARAGRAPH TO REFER THE READER TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THE FILING FOR A MORE DETAILED PRESENTATION.

We have revised the introductory paragraph on page 4 to include references to the financial statements as follows:

"The following information was taken from Voyager One's financial statements since inception (June 28, 2002) to September 30, 2004 (unaudited) and the consolidated nine months ended September 30, 2004 (unaudited) and nine months ended September 30, 2003 (unaudited) which appear beginning on Page F-15 of this prospectus and the Silicon Film Technologies financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2003 (audited) and year ended December 31, 2002 (audited) which appear beginning on page F-2 of this prospectus. For a more detailed presentation refer to these financial statements."

5. PLEASE REVISE FOOTNOTE (1) TO CLARIFY THAT THE FINANCIAL RESULTS REFLECT THE OPERATING RESULTS OF SILICON FILM TECHNOLOGIES THROUGH FEBRUARY 25, 2004, AND THE RESULTS OF THE COMBINED ENTITY FOLLOWING THAT DATE. LIKEWISE, CLARIFY THAT THE BALANCE SHEET AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2004 REPRESENTS THE FINANCIAL CONDITION OF THE COMBINED ENTITY.

We have clarified our disclosures in the footnotes on page 4 as follows:

"(1) This represents the operating results of Silicon Film Technologies through February 25, 2004, and the results of the consolidated entity of Voyager One and Silicon Film Technologies after February 25, 2004.

(2) This represents the operating results of Silicon Film Technologies.

(3) This represents the financial condition of the consolidated entity of Voyager One and Silicon Film Technologies."

SELLING STOCKHOLDERS --------------------

6. PLEASE SUPPLEMENTALLY EXPLAIN WHY YOU HAVE LISTED TREY RESOURCES AS THE BENEFICIAL OWNER OF 440,000 SHARES UNDERLYING THE CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURES TO BE ISSUED TO CORNELL CAPITAL PARTNERS. FOR EXAMPLE, SINCE IT APPEARS THAT TREY RESOURCES HAS AGREED TO PURCHASE $550,000 IN CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURES FROM CORNELL CAPITAL PARTNERS, ITS APPEARS THAT TREY RESOURCES MAY ONLY B

Show Raw Text
<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>CORRESP
<SEQUENCE>1
<FILENAME>filename1.txt
<TEXT>

<PAGE>

                                                                 PHILIP E. RUBEN
                                                                  (847) 784-2176
                                                              PRUBEN@LPLEGAL.COM

January 31, 2005

VIA FACSIMILE:  (202) 942-9648
------------------------------

Securities and Exchange Commission
Division of Corporation Finance
Judicial Plaza
450 Fifth Street
Washington, D.C. 20549-0404

Attention:        David Ritenour
                  Special Counsel

RE:      VOYAGER ONE, INC.
         FORM SB-2, FILED ON AUGUST 26, 2004

Dear Mr. Ritenour:

On behalf of our client, Voyager One, Inc. ("Voyager" or the "Company"), we are
filing today under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities
Act"), amendment no. 3 to the Company's registration statement on Form SB-2. The
amendment to Form SB-2 will be filed for the purpose of responding to comments
contained in a letter from the Securities and Exchange Commission dated January
13, 2005.

In the hope of expediting the process of responding to the staff's comments, we
have set forth below our responses to the staff's letter, including, wherever
feasible, the text of revisions and additions to the SB-2. For ease of
reference, we have included below the text of the staff's letter, and our
responses are structured to correspond to the comment numbers from that letter.
The Company has requested that we respond as follows to the staff's comments:

GENERAL
-------

         PROSPECTUS SUMMARY

1.       PLEASE UPDATE YOUR DISCLOSURE TO THE EXTENT PRACTICAL, INCLUDING THE
         PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT MILESTONE TABLE THAT APPEARS ON PAGE 34 AND THE
         EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION INFORMATION THAT APPEARS ON PAGE 44. PLEASE ALSO
         FILE AN UPDATED LEGALITY OPINION.

                  We have updated various disclosures throughout amendment no. 3
                  to the registration statement. These are reflected on the
                  blackline version furnished with this response letter.

                  In particular, we have revised the product development
                  milestone table on page 32 to read as follows:
<PAGE>
<TABLE>

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
January 31, 2005
Page 2

                 ------------------ -------------------- ------------------- ----------------- --------------------
                               Product Engineering
                      Product          Requirements         Development        System Test        Manufacturing
                 ------------------ -------------------- ------------------- ----------------- --------------------
                      <S>                 <C>                 <C>                <C>                 <C>
                      EFS-4               2Q 2004             1Q 2005            2Q 2005             4Q 2005
                 ------------------ -------------------- ------------------- ----------------- --------------------
                      EFS-10              2Q 2005             3Q 2004            4Q 2005             1Q 2006
                 ------------------ -------------------- ------------------- ----------------- --------------------
                      EFS-18              4Q 2005             1Q 2006            2Q 2006            4Q 20064
                 ------------------ -------------------- ------------------- ----------------- --------------------

                  We have also revised the product development milestone table
                  on page 32 to read as follows:

                 ---------------- --------------- ---------------- --------------- -------------- -----------------
                     Product         2H 2004          1H 2005         2H 2005         1H 2006         2H 2006
                 ---------------- --------------- ---------------- --------------- -------------- -----------------
                     EFS-4           $120,000       $2,200,000       $1,100,000         --               --
                 ---------------- --------------- ---------------- --------------- -------------- -----------------
                     EFS-10             --              --           $1,400,000     $1,600,000           --
                 ---------------- --------------- ---------------- --------------- -------------- -----------------
                     EFS- 18            --              --               --          $700,000        $1,600,000
                 ---------------- --------------- ---------------- --------------- -------------- -----------------
                      Total          $120,000       $2,200,000       $2,500,000     $2,300,000       $1,600,000
                 ---------------- --------------- ---------------- --------------- -------------- -----------------
</TABLE>

                  In addition, we have updated the Summary Compensation Table on
                  page 42 and filed an updated legality opinion as Exhibit 5.1.

PROSPECTUS SUMMARY

2.       WE NOTE YOUR RESPONSE TO COMMENT 1. WE ALSO NOTE THAT THE DISCLOSURES
         CONTAINED IN THE THIRD, FOURTH AND FIFTH SENTENCES OF THE FOURTH
         PARAGRAPH OF THE SUMMARY ALSO APPEAR ON PAGE 32. GIVEN THE DEVELOPMENT
         STAGE OF YOUR COMPANY, WE BELIEVE THAT THOSE DISCLOSURE ARE MORE
         APPROPRIATELY INCLUDED IN THE BODY OF THE PROSPECTUS RATHER THAN IN THE
         PROSPECTUS SUMMARY. ACCORDINGLY, PLEASE REVISE THE FOURTH PARAGRAPH OF
         THE SUMMARY TO DELETE THE THIRD, FOURTH AND FIFTH SENTENCES OF THAT
         PARAGRAPH.

                  In response to the staff's comment, we revised the fourth
                  paragraph of the summary to delete duplicative sentences.

THE OFFERING

3.       WE NOTE YOU RESPONSE TO COMMENT 4. WE ALSO NOTE THAT YOU ARE CONTINUING
         TO REGISTER UP TO 4,400,000 SHARES TO BE ISSUED UPON CONVERSION OF THE
         CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURES, WHICH REPRESENTS A CONVERSION PRICE OF $0.25
         PER SHARE. THE NUMBER OF SHARES TO BE REGISTERED FOR RESALE MUST BE
         BASED ON A GOOD FAITH ESTIMATE OF THE NUMBER OF SHARES TO BE ISSUED
         UPON CONVERSION OF THE CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURES. BASED ON YOUR RESPONSE
         TO COMMENT 4, IT APPEARS THAT YOUR GOOD FAITH ESTIMATE OF THE
         CONVERSION PRICE MAY BE $2.50 PER SHARE. IF SO, THEN PLEASE REDUCE THE
         NUMBER OF SHARES THAT YOU REGISTERING FOR RESALE BY CORNELL CAPITAL
         PARTNERS AND TREY RESOURCES CONSISTENT WITH A $2.50 CONVERSION PRICE,
         AND REVISE AS APPROPRIATE TO ENSURE THAT THE DISCLOSURES THROUGH YOUR
         PROSPECTUS ARE CONSISTENT WITH A $2.50 PER SHARE CONVERSION PRICE.
         ALTERNATIVELY, IF YOUR GOOD FAITH ESTIMATE OF THE CONVERSION PRICE IS
         $0.25 PER SHARE, THEN THAT CONVERSION PRICE NEEDS TO BE USED THROUGHOUT
         THE PROSPECTUS, INCLUDING ON PAGE 8, 13, 15, 16, 20 AND 21.

<PAGE>

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
January 31, 2005
Page 3

                  The debentures are convertible at a price equal to the lower
                  of (i) 150% of the lowest initial bid price of the common
                  stock as submitted by a market maker and approved by the NASD
                  and (ii) 50% of the lowest closing bid price of the common
                  stock for the five trading days immediately preceding the
                  conversion date. For purposes of determining beneficial
                  ownership of our common stock in respect of convertible
                  debentures, we have assumed throughout the prospectus a lowest
                  closing bid price of $2.50 per share. The resulting holders'
                  conversion price would be $1.25 per share (50% of the assumed
                  $2.50 closing bid price). Accordingly, the holders' aggregate
                  beneficial ownership of our common stock is calculated to be
                  880,000 shares (the aggregate $1,100,000 face value divided by
                  the $1.25 assumed conversion price). Our shares do not yet
                  trade on any exchange, and therefore we cannot know what the
                  actual trading price will be. We have made a good faith
                  estimate that the number of shares of our common stock needed
                  upon conversion of the convertible debentures is 2,200,000
                  shares (250% of 880,000 shares beneficially owned).

                  We have revised the lead-in disclosures to the table on page
                  13 as well as footnotes (3) and (5) to that table for
                  consistency with the foregoing. See also our response to
                  comment 6, below.

SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
-----------------------------

4.       PLEASE REVISE TO ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING:

         a)       EXPAND THE TABLE TO ALSO INCLUDE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS DATA
                  FOR EACH OF THE FISCAL YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003 AND 2002,
                  AND REVISE THE INTRODUCTORY PARAGRAPH TO SO INDICATE.

                  We have expanded the table on page 4 to include statement of
                  operations data for each of the fiscal years ended December
                  31, 2003 and 2002 and have revised our disclosures in the
                  introductory paragraph on page 5 to read as follows:

                  "The following information was taken from Voyager One's
                  financial statements since inception (June 28, 2002) to
                  September 30, 2004 (unaudited) and the consolidated nine
                  months ended September 30, 2004 (unaudited) and nine months
                  ended September 30, 2003 (unaudited) which appear beginning on
                  Page F-15 of this prospectus and the Silicon Film Technologies
                  financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2003
                  (audited) and year ended December 31, 2002 (audited) which
                  appear beginning on page F-2 of this prospectus. For a more
                  detailed presentation refer to these financial statements."

         b)       INSTEAD OF THE DETAILED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND BALANCE
                  SHEET DATA CURRENTLY PRESENTED, CONSIDER ONLY SHOWING MAJOR
                  STATEMENT CAPTIONS SUCH, OPERATING EXPENSES, INTEREST EXPENSE,
                  NET LOSS BEFORE TAXES, NET LOSS, NET LOSS PER SHARE, TOTAL
                  CURRENT ASSETS, TOTAL ASSETS, TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES, LONG
                  TERM DEBT, THE INDIVIDUAL COMPONENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY,
                  TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY AND TOTAL LIABILITIES AND
                  STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT).

                  We have revised the disclosures in the statement of operations
                  data to show only the major statement captions of "total
                  operating expenses and loss from operations," "interest
                  expense," "net loss before taxes," "net loss," and "net loss
                  per share," and revised the balance sheet data to show only
                  the major statement captions of "total current assets," "total
                  assets," "total current liabilities," "long term note
                  payable," "preferred stock," "common stock," "additional
                  paid-in capital," "deficit accumulated during development
                  stage," "total stockholders' equity (deficit)" and "total
                  liabilities and stockholders' equity (deficit)."

<PAGE>

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
January 31, 2005
Page 4

         c)       REMOVE THE "AUDITED" LABEL ABOVE ANY CAPTIONS, AS THAT LABEL
                  MAY CONFUSE AN INVESTOR INTO BELIEVING THAT HE AUDITOR WAS
                  ENGAGED TO AUDIT THE INFORMATION. RATHER INCLUDE A STATEMENT
                  IN THE INTRODUCTORY PARAGRAPH TO INDICATE WHICH INFORMATION
                  WAS DERIVED FROM THE AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND WHICH
                  INFORMATION WAS DERIVED FROM THE UNAUDITED INTERIM FINANCIAL
                  DATA.

                  We have deleted the "audited" labels above any captions to
                  avoid confusion and have revised the introductory paragraph to
                  read as follows:

                  "The following information was taken from Voyager One's
                  financial statements since inception (June 28, 2002) to
                  September 30, 2004 (unaudited) and the consolidated nine
                  months ended September 30, 2004 (unaudited) and nine months
                  ended September 30, 2003 (unaudited) which appear beginning on
                  Page F-15 of this prospectus and the Silicon Film Technologies
                  financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2003
                  (audited) and year ended December 31, 2002 (audited) which
                  appear beginning on page F-2 of this prospectus. For a more
                  detailed presentation refer to these financial statements. In
                  management's opinion all adjustments (consisting of normal
                  recurring items) considered necessary for a fair presentation
                  have been included."

         d)       REVISE THE INTRODUCTORY PARAGRAPH TO REFER THE READER TO THE
                  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THE FILING FOR A MORE
                  DETAILED PRESENTATION.

                  We have revised the introductory paragraph on page 4 to
                  include references to the financial statements as follows:

                  "The following information was taken from Voyager One's
                  financial statements since inception (June 28, 2002) to
                  September 30, 2004 (unaudited) and the consolidated nine
                  months ended September 30, 2004 (unaudited) and nine months
                  ended September 30, 2003 (unaudited) which appear beginning on
                  Page F-15 of this prospectus and the Silicon Film Technologies
                  financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2003
                  (audited) and year ended December 31, 2002 (audited) which
                  appear beginning on page F-2 of this prospectus. For a more
                  detailed presentation refer to these financial statements."

5.       PLEASE REVISE FOOTNOTE (1) TO CLARIFY THAT THE FINANCIAL RESULTS
         REFLECT THE OPERATING RESULTS OF SILICON FILM TECHNOLOGIES THROUGH
         FEBRUARY 25, 2004, AND THE RESULTS OF THE COMBINED ENTITY FOLLOWING
         THAT DATE. LIKEWISE, CLARIFY THAT THE BALANCE SHEET AS OF SEPTEMBER 30,
         2004 REPRESENTS THE FINANCIAL CONDITION OF THE COMBINED ENTITY.

                  We have clarified our disclosures in the footnotes on page 4
                  as follows:

                  "(1) This represents the operating results of Silicon Film
                  Technologies through February 25, 2004, and the results of the
                  consolidated entity of Voyager One and Silicon Film
                  Technologies after February 25, 2004.

                  (2) This represents the operating results of Silicon Film
                  Technologies.

                  (3) This represents the financial condition of the
                  consolidated entity of Voyager One and Silicon Film
                  Technologies."

SELLING STOCKHOLDERS
--------------------

6.       PLEASE SUPPLEMENTALLY EXPLAIN WHY YOU HAVE LISTED TREY RESOURCES AS THE
         BENEFICIAL OWNER OF 440,000 SHARES UNDERLYING THE CONVERTIBLE
         DEBENTURES TO BE ISSUED TO CORNELL CAPITAL PARTNERS. FOR EXAMPLE, SINCE
         IT APPEARS THAT TREY RESOURCES HAS AGREED TO PURCHASE $550,000 IN
         CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURES FROM CORNELL CAPITAL PARTNERS, ITS APPEARS THAT
         TREY RESOURCES MAY ONLY B