SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Probe Scores Topics IPO Watchlist Monthly Activity About API

SEC Company Response from INSULET CORP (PODD) (CIK 0001145197) (PODD) — Oct 8, 2010

INSULET CORP (PODD) (CIK 0001145197)
Date: Oct. 8, 2010 · CIK: 0001145197 · Accession: 0000950123-10-092342

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

Sentiment
Urgency
Document Type
Confidence
SEC Posture
Company Posture

Summary

Reasoning

File numbers found in text: 001-33462

Referenced dates: September 24, 2010

Date
October 8, 2010
Author
/s/ Brian Roberts
Form
CORRESP
Company
INSULET CORP (PODD) (CIK 0001145197)

Letter

United States Securities and Exchange Commission Division of Corporation Finance Attention: Mr. Kevin Kuhar Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year ended December 31, 2009 Filed March 9, 2010 Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-K filed August 9, 2010 File No. 001-33462

Re: Insulet Corporation

Dear Ladies and Gentlemen:

This letter is being furnished on behalf of Insulet Corporation (the “Company”) in response to the comment in the letter dated September 24, 2010 (the “Letter”) from the Staff (the “Staff”) of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) to Brian Roberts, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, with respect to the Company’s Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year ended December 31, 2009 that was filed March 9, 2010 and the Company’s Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-K filed August 9, 2010.

To facilitate your review of our response, we have repeated in full your comment in italics below.

Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2009

Note 16. Restatement of Previously Issued Financial Statements, page F-23

2.

Please refer to prior comment 2 from our August 27, 2010 letter. We note your response to our comment where you discuss the cash flow analysis you prepared for the original and amended debt agreements under various prepayment scenarios under FASB ASC 470-50-40-12(c). Please provide us with a summary of the revised cash flow analysis you prepared for the original and amended debt agreements which support your debt modification treatment along with the cash flow analysis you used originally to support the debt extinguishment conclusion. Please include sufficient reasonable detail under the appropriate scenarios, including the exercise or nonexercise of the prepayment option, for us to understand your cash flow analysis.

RESPONSE: At the time of the September 2009 modification to our debt agreement, we performed a calculation considering the change in the present value of the cash flows of the

original and modified debt agreements and determined that the change in the present value of the cash flows under the terms of the amended debt was greater than 10% from the present value of the remaining cash flows under the terms of the original debt. Accordingly, the debt was considered to be extinguished.

In June 2010, we entered into a second amendment with Deerfield to modify additional terms of the debt agreement. While finalizing the accounting for this amendment in connection with the filing of the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, we revisited the calculation from September 2009 and determined that we did not appropriately consider the present value of the cash flows for the original and amended debt arrangements under various prepayment scenarios as required by ASC 470-50-40-12 c. In addition, we determined that the calculation of the change in present value of the cash flows under the debt arrangement compared to the original debt arrangement, including the effective interest rate, was not correct as it included the commitment fees on the unborrowed funds and excluded the discount on the original debt issuance. Therefore, we revised the present value calculations for the various prepayment scenarios utilizing the appropriate interest rates and determined that at September 2009, we did not have a change greater than 10% in the present value of the remaining cash flows in all scenarios. As such, the first amendment should have been treated as a modification of the original debt and not as an extinguishment of debt.

As noted in the calculation below, we considered the following factors in our original determination of the present value of the remaining cash flows on both the original and amended debt.

•

Repaid initial borrowing of $27.5 million

•

Borrowed the remaining $32.5 million under the original $60 million facility

•

Reduced the cash interest rate from 9.75% on borrowed funds to 8.5%

•

Added in the prepayment penalty (ranging from 2% — 5%) based on timing of prepayment

We prepared the original calculation of the change in the present value of remaining cash flows with the assumptions as follows:

Pay off at Maturity

Original Debt

Modified Debt

Change

Gross Debt

$ 27,500,000

$ 32,500,000

Effective Interest Rate

13.0 %

13.0 %

Quarterly Interest Payments

$ 893,750

$ 690,625

Interest Payments through

September 2012

September 2012

Number of Interest payments

Principal Payment Amount

$ 27,500,000

$ 32,500,000

Principle Payment Date

September 2012

September 2012

Present Value of Cash Flows

$ 27,500,000

$ 23,914,000

-13.04 %

Note that the quarterly interest payment of $893,750 includes the stated interest on the original debt as well as the commitment fee of $223,437 on unborrowed funds.

In the modified calculations, we recalculated the effective interest to be 20.5% properly reflecting (i) the discount on the debt at its original issuance date and (ii) exclusion of the commitment fee on unborrowed funds. In addition, we recalculated the present value of cash flows of the original and modified debt at various prepayment dates given the varying penalty amounts. Details of the various calculations we performed are presented below:

Amended Calculations:

Pay off October 2009

Original Debt

Modified Debt

Change

Gross Debt

$ 27,500,000

$ 32,500,000

Discount on debt*

$ (7,264,813 )

—

Discount on shares issued**

—

$ (1,856,178 )

Effective Interest Rate

20.5 %

20.5 %

Quarterly Interest Payments

$ 670,313

$ 690,625

Interest Payments through

None

None

Number of Interest payments

—

—

Prepayment penalty

—

%

Principal Payment Amount

$ 27,500,000

$ 29,356,178

Principal Payment Date

October 2009

October 2009

Present Value of Cash Flows

$ 27,500,000

$ 30,981,178

12.66 %

Pay off at April 2010

Original Debt

Modified Debt

Change

Gross Debt

$ 27,500,000

$ 32,500,000

Discount on debt*

$ (7,264,813 )

—

Discount on shares issued**

—

$ (1,856,178 )

Effective Interest Rate

20.5 %

20.5 %

Quarterly Interest Payments

$ 670,313

$ 690,625

Interest Payments through

March 2010

March 2010

Number of Interest payments

Prepayment penalty

—

%

Principal Payment Amount

$ 27,500,000

$ 32,500,000

Principal Payment Date

March 2010

March 2010

Present Value of Cash Flows

$ 26,126,614

$ 29,014,922

11.06 %

Pay off at October 2010

Original Debt

Modified Debt

Change

Gross Debt

$ 27,500,000

$ 32,500,000

Discount on debt*

$ (7,264,813 )

—

Discount on shares issued**

—

$ (1,856,178 )

Effective Interest Rate

20.5 %

20.5 %

Quarterly Interest Payments

$ 670,313

$ 690,625

Interest Payments through

September 2010

September 2010

Number of Interest payments

Prepayment penalty

—

%

Principal Payment Amount

$ 27,500,000

$ 32,500,000

Principal Payment Date

October 2010

October 2010

Present Value of Cash Flows

$ 24,883,950

$ 26,969,721

8.38 %

Pay off at April 2011

Original Debt

Modified Debt

Change

Gross Debt

$ 27,500,000

$ 32,500,000

Discount on debt*

$ (7,264,813 )

—

Discount on shares issued**

—

$ (1,856,178 )

Effective Interest Rate

20.5 %

20.5 %

Quarterly Interest Payments

$ 670,313

$ 690,625

Interest Payments through

March 2011

March 2011

Number of Interest payments

Prepayment penalty

—

%

Principal Payment Amount

$ 27,500,000

$ 32,500,000

Principal Payment Date

April 2011

April 2011

Present Value of Cash Flows

$ 23,759,565

$ 25,144,523

5.83 %

Pay off at October 2011

Original Debt

Modified Debt

Change

Gross Debt

$ 27,500,000

$ 32,500,000

Discount on debt*

$ (7,264,813 )

—

Discount on shares issued**

—

$ (1,856,178 )

Effective Interest Rate

20.5 %

20.5 %

Quarterly Interest Payments

$ 670,313

$ 690,625

Interest Payments through

September 2011

September 2011

Number of Interest payments

Prepayment penalty

%

Principal Payment Amount

$ 27,500,000

$ 32,500,000

Principal Payment Date

October 2011

October 2011

Present Value of Cash Flows

$ 22,742,202

$ 23,515,966

3.40 %

Pay off at Maturity

Original Debt

Modified Debt

Change

Gross Debt

$ 27,500,000

$ 32,500,000

Discount on debt*

$ (7,264,813 )

—

Discount on shares issued**

—

$ (1,856,178 )

Effective Interest Rate

20.5 %

20.5 %

Quarterly Interest Payments

$ 670,313

$ 690,625

Interest Payments through

September 2012

September 2012

Number of Interest payments

Prepayment Penalty

—

—

Principal Payment Amount

$ 27,500,000

$ 32,500,000

Principal Payment Date

September 2012

September 2012

Present Value of Cash Flows

$ 20,988,763

$ 20,767,382

-1.05 %

*

Includes fair value of warrants of $6.1 million as well as transaction fees of $1.2 million paid to Deerfield Management Company.

**

At the date of the modification we issued 2,855,659 shares of Insulet common stock which had a fair value of $29,356,178 to settle the original debt of $27,500,000. The excess fair value reduces the $5,000,000 incremental borrowing on the date of the modification

We revised the present value calculations for the various prepayment scenarios as well as the discount on the shares utilizing the appropriate interest rates and determined that at September 2009, we did not have a change greater than 10% in the present value of the remaining cash flows in all scenarios. Accordingly, we determined that the amendment should have been treated as a modification of the original debt rather than as an extinguishment of debt.

* * *

On behalf of the Company, I hereby acknowledge that:

•

the Company is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in the filings:

•

Staff comments or changes to disclosure in response to Staff comments do not foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to the filings: and

•

the Company may not assert Staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of the Unite States.

Should you have any further comments or questions with regard to the foregoing, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned by phone at (781) 457-4848 or by e-mail at broberts@insulet.com

Sincerely,
/s/ Brian Roberts

Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm

corresp

October 8, 2010

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

Division of Corporation Finance

Mail Stop 3030

100 F. Street, N.E.

Washington, D.C. 20549-6010

Attention: Mr. Kevin Kuhar

Re: Insulet Corporation

Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year ended December 31, 2009

Filed March 9, 2010

Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-K filed August 9, 2010

File No. 001-33462

Dear Ladies and Gentlemen:

This
letter is being furnished on behalf of Insulet Corporation (the
“Company”) in response to the
comment in the letter dated September 24, 2010 (the “Letter”) from the Staff (the “Staff”) of the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) to Brian Roberts, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, with respect to the Company’s Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year ended December 31, 2009
that was filed March 9, 2010 and the Company’s Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-K filed August 9, 2010.

To facilitate your review of our response, we have repeated in full your comment in italics below.

Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2009

Note 16. Restatement of Previously Issued Financial Statements, page F-23

    2.

    Please refer to prior comment 2 from our August 27, 2010 letter. We note your response to
our comment where you discuss the cash flow analysis you prepared for the original and amended
debt agreements under various prepayment scenarios under FASB ASC 470-50-40-12(c). Please
provide us with a summary of the revised cash flow analysis you prepared for the original and
amended debt agreements which support your debt modification treatment along with the cash
flow analysis you used originally to support the debt extinguishment conclusion. Please
include sufficient reasonable detail under the appropriate scenarios, including the exercise
or nonexercise of the prepayment option, for us to understand your cash flow analysis.

RESPONSE: At the time of the September 2009 modification to our debt agreement, we performed a
calculation considering the change in the present value of the cash flows of the

original and modified debt agreements and determined that the change in the present value of the
cash flows under the terms of the amended debt was greater than 10% from the present value of the
remaining cash flows under the terms of the original debt. Accordingly, the debt was considered to
be extinguished.

In June 2010, we entered into a second amendment with Deerfield to modify additional terms of the
debt agreement. While finalizing the accounting for this amendment in connection with the filing
of the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, we revisited the calculation from September
2009 and determined that we did not appropriately consider the present value of the cash flows for
the original and amended debt arrangements under various prepayment scenarios as required by ASC
470-50-40-12 c. In addition, we determined that the calculation of the change in present value of
the cash flows under the debt arrangement compared to the original debt arrangement, including the
effective interest rate, was not correct as it included the commitment fees on the unborrowed funds
and excluded the discount on the original debt issuance. Therefore, we revised the present value
calculations for the various prepayment scenarios utilizing the appropriate interest rates and
determined that at September 2009, we did not have a change greater than 10% in the present value
of the remaining cash flows in all scenarios. As such, the first amendment should have been
treated as a modification of the original debt and not as an extinguishment of debt.

As noted in the calculation below, we considered the following factors in our original
determination of the present value of the remaining cash flows on both the original and amended
debt.

    •

    Repaid initial borrowing of $27.5 million

    •

    Borrowed the remaining $32.5 million under the original $60 million facility

    •

    Reduced the cash interest rate from 9.75% on borrowed funds to 8.5%

    •

    Added in the prepayment penalty (ranging from 2% — 5%) based on timing of prepayment

We prepared the original calculation of the change in the present value of remaining cash flows
with the assumptions as follows:

2

    Pay off at Maturity

    Original Debt

    Modified Debt

    Change

    Gross Debt

    $
    27,500,000

    $
    32,500,000

    Effective Interest Rate

    13.0
    %

    13.0
    %

    Quarterly Interest Payments

    $
    893,750

    $
    690,625

    Interest Payments through

    September 2012

    September 2012

    Number of Interest payments

    12

    12

    Principal Payment Amount

    $
    27,500,000

    $
    32,500,000

    Principle Payment Date

    September 2012

    September 2012

    Present Value of Cash Flows

    $
    27,500,000

    $
    23,914,000

    -13.04
    %

Note that the quarterly interest payment of $893,750 includes the stated interest on the
original debt as well as the commitment fee of $223,437 on unborrowed funds.

In the modified calculations, we recalculated the effective interest to be 20.5% properly
reflecting (i) the discount on the debt at its original issuance date and (ii) exclusion of the
commitment fee on unborrowed funds. In addition, we recalculated the present value of cash flows
of the original and modified debt at various prepayment dates given the varying penalty amounts.
Details of the various calculations we performed are presented below:

Amended Calculations:

    Pay off October 2009

    Original Debt

    Modified Debt

    Change

    Gross Debt

    $
    27,500,000

    $
    32,500,000

    Discount on debt*

    $
    (7,264,813
    )

    —

    Discount on shares issued**

    —

    $
    (1,856,178
    )

    Effective Interest Rate

    20.5
    %

    20.5
    %

    Quarterly Interest Payments

    $
    670,313

    $
    690,625

    Interest Payments through

    None

    None

    Number of Interest payments

    —

    —

    Prepayment penalty

    —

    5
    %

    Principal Payment Amount

    $
    27,500,000

    $
    29,356,178

    Principal Payment Date

    October 2009

    October 2009

    Present Value of Cash Flows

    $
    27,500,000

    $
    30,981,178

    12.66
    %

    Pay off at April 2010

    Original Debt

    Modified Debt

    Change

    Gross Debt

    $
    27,500,000

    $
    32,500,000

    Discount on debt*

    $
    (7,264,813
    )

    —

    Discount on shares issued**

    —

    $
    (1,856,178
    )

    Effective Interest Rate

    20.5
    %

    20.5
    %

    Quarterly Interest Payments

    $
    670,313

    $
    690,625

    Interest Payments through

    March 2010

    March 2010

    Number of Interest payments

    2

    2

    Prepayment penalty

    —

    4
    %

    Principal Payment Amount

    $
    27,500,000

    $
    32,500,000

    Principal Payment Date

    March 2010

    March 2010

    Present Value of Cash Flows

    $
    26,126,614

    $
    29,014,922

    11.06
    %

3

    Pay off at October 2010

    Original Debt

    Modified Debt

    Change

    Gross Debt

    $
    27,500,000

    $
    32,500,000

    Discount on debt*

    $
    (7,264,813
    )

    —

    Discount on shares issued**

    —

    $
    (1,856,178
    )

    Effective Interest Rate

    20.5
    %

    20.5
    %

    Quarterly Interest Payments

    $
    670,313

    $
    690,625

    Interest Payments through

    September 2010

    September 2010

    Number of Interest payments

    4

    4

    Prepayment penalty

    —

    4
    %

    Principal Payment Amount

    $
    27,500,000

    $
    32,500,000

    Principal Payment Date

    October 2010

    October 2010

    Present Value of Cash Flows

    $
    24,883,950

    $
    26,969,721

    8.38
    %

    Pay off at April 2011

    Original Debt

    Modified Debt

    Change

    Gross Debt

    $
    27,500,000

    $
    32,500,000

    Discount on debt*

    $
    (7,264,813
    )

    —

    Discount on shares issued**

    —

    $
    (1,856,178
    )

    Effective Interest Rate

    20.5
    %

    20.5
    %

    Quarterly Interest Payments

    $
    670,313

    $
    690,625

    Interest Payments through

    March 2011

    March 2011

    Number of Interest payments

    6

    6

    Prepayment penalty

    —

    3
    %

    Principal Payment Amount

    $
    27,500,000

    $
    32,500,000

    Principal Payment Date

    April 2011

    April 2011

    Present Value of Cash Flows

    $
    23,759,565

    $
    25,144,523

    5.83
    %

    Pay off at October 2011

    Original Debt

    Modified Debt

    Change

    Gross Debt

    $
    27,500,000

    $
    32,500,000

    Discount on debt*

    $
    (7,264,813
    )

    —

    Discount on shares issued**

    —

    $
    (1,856,178
    )

    Effective Interest Rate

    20.5
    %

    20.5
    %

    Quarterly Interest Payments

    $
    670,313

    $
    690,625

    Interest Payments through

    September 2011

    September 2011

    Number of Interest payments

    8

    8

    Prepayment penalty

    2
    %

    Principal Payment Amount

    $
    27,500,000

    $
    32,500,000

    Principal Payment Date

    October 2011

    October 2011

    Present Value of Cash Flows

    $
    22,742,202

    $
    23,515,966

    3.40
    %

4

    Pay off at Maturity

    Original Debt

    Modified Debt

    Change

    Gross Debt

    $
    27,500,000

    $
    32,500,000

    Discount on debt*

    $
    (7,264,813
    )

    —

    Discount on shares issued**

    —

    $
    (1,856,178
    )

    Effective Interest Rate

    20.5
    %

    20.5
    %

    Quarterly Interest Payments

    $
    670,313

    $
    690,625

    Interest Payments through

    September 2012

    September 2012

    Number of Interest payments

    12

    12

    Prepayment Penalty

    —

    —

    Principal Payment Amount

    $
    27,500,000

    $
    32,500,000

    Principal Payment Date

    September 2012

    September 2012

    Present Value of Cash Flows

    $
    20,988,763

    $
    20,767,382

    -1.05
    %

    *

    Includes fair value of warrants of $6.1 million as well as transaction fees
of $1.2 million paid to Deerfield Management Company.

    **

    At the date of the modification we issued 2,855,659 shares of Insulet
common stock which had a fair value of $29,356,178 to settle the original debt
of $27,500,000. The excess fair value reduces the $5,000,000 incremental
borrowing on the date of the modification

We revised the present value calculations for the various prepayment scenarios as well as the
discount on the shares utilizing the appropriate interest rates and determined that at September
2009, we did not have a change greater than 10% in the present value of the remaining cash flows in
all scenarios. Accordingly, we determined that the amendment should have been treated as a
modification of the original debt rather than as an extinguishment of debt.

*       *       *

On behalf of the Company, I hereby acknowledge that:

    •

    the Company is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in the
filings:

    •

    Staff comments or changes to disclosure in response to Staff comments do not foreclose
the Commission from taking any action with respect to the filings: and

    •

    the Company may not assert Staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated by
the Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of the Unite States.

Should you have any further comments or questions with regard to the foregoing, please do not
hesitate to contact the undersigned by phone at (781) 457-4848 or by e-mail at broberts@insulet.com

    Sincerely,

    /s/ Brian Roberts

    Brian Roberts

    Chief Financial Officer

    cc:

    Raymond C. Zemlin, Esq.

(Goodwin Procter LLP)

5

Original Calculation

    Pay off at Maturity

    Original Debt

    Modified Debt

    Change

    Gross Debt

    $
    27,500,000

    $
    32,500,000

    Effective Interest Rate

    13.0
    %

    13.0
    %

    Quarterly Interest Payments

    $
    893,750

    $
    690,625

    Interest Payments through

    September 2012

    September 2012

    Number of Interest payments

    12

    12

    Principal Payment Amount

    $
    27,500,000

    $
    32,500,000

    Principle Payment Date

    September 2012

    September 2012

    Present Value of Cash Flows

    $
    27,500,000

    $
    23,914,000

    -13.04
    %

    Amended Calculations:

    Pay off October 2009

    Original Debt

    Modified Debt

    Change

    Gross Debt

    $
    27,500,000

    $
    32,500,000

    Discount on debt*

    $
    (7,264,813
    )

    —

    Discount on shares issued**

    —

    $
    (1,856,178
    )

    Effective Interest Rate

    20.5
    %

    20.5
    %

    Quarterly Interest Payments

    $
    670,313

    $
    690,625

    Interest Payments through

    None

    None

    Number of Interest payments

    —

    —

    Prepayment penalty

    —

    5
    %

    Principal Payment Amount

    $
    27,500,000

    $
    29,356,178

    Principal Payment Date

    October 2009

    October 2009

    Present Value of Cash Flows

    $
    27,500,000

    $
    30,981,178

    12.66
    %

    Pay off at April 2010

    Original Debt

    Modified Debt

    Change

    Gross Debt

    $
    27,500,000

    $
    32,500,000

    Discount on debt*

    $
    (7,264,813
    )

    $
    (7,264,813
    )

    Discount on shares issued**

    —

    $
    (1,856,178
    )

    Effective Interest Rate

    20.5
    %

    20.5
    %

    Quarterly Interest Payments

    $
    670,313

    $
    690,625

    Interest Payments through

    March 2010

    March 2010

    Number of Interest payments

    2

    2

    Prepayment penalty

    —

    4
    %

    Principal Payment Amount

    $
    27,500,000

    $
    32,500,000

    Principal Payment Date

    March 2010

    March 2010

    Present Value of Cash Flows

    $
    26,126,614

    $
    29,014,922

    11.06
    %

    Pay off at October 2010

    Original Debt

    Modified Debt

    Change

    Gross Debt

    $
    27,500,000

    $
    32,500,000

    Discount on debt*

    $
    (7,264,813
    )

    —

    Discount on shares issued**

    —

    $
    (1,856,178
    )

    Effective Interest Rate

    20.5
    %

    20.5
    %

    Quarterly Interest Payments

    $
    670,313

    $
    690,625

    Interest Payments through

    September 2010

    September 2010

    Number of Interest payments

    4

    4

    Prepayment penalty

    —

    4
    %

    Principal Payment Amount

    $
    27,500,000

    $
    32,500,000

    Principal Payment Date

    October 2010

    October 2010

    Present Value of Cash Flows

    $
    24,883,950

    $
    26,969,721

    8.38
    %

    Pay off at April 2011

    Original Debt

    Modified Debt

    Change

    Gross Debt

    $
    27,500,000

    $
    32,500,000

    Discount on debt*

    $
    (7,264,813
    )

    —

    Discount on shares issued**

    —

    $
    (1,856,178
    )

    Effective Interest Rate

    20.5
    %

    20.5
    %

    Quarterly Interest Payments

    $
    670,313

    $
    690,625

    Interest Payments through

    March 2011

    March 2011

    Number of Interest payments

    6

    6

    Prepayment penalty

    —

    3
    %

    Principal Payment Amount

    $
    27,500,000

    $
    32,500,000

    Principal Payment Date

    April 2011

    April 2011

    Present Value of Cash Flows

    $
    23,759,565

    $
    25,144,523

    5.83
    %

    Pay off at October 2011

    Original Debt

    Modified Debt

    Change

    Gross Debt

    $
    27,500,000

    $
    32,500,000

    Discount on debt*

    $
    (7,264,813
    )

    —