SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Topics Monthly Activity About

SEC Comment Letter 0000000000-23-009177 to Prairie Operating Co. (PROP)

Prairie Operating Co.
Date: Aug. 22, 2023 · CIK: 0001162896 · Accession: 0000000000-23-009177

Regulatory Compliance Financial Reporting Risk Disclosure

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

Sentiment
Urgency
Document Type
Confidence
SEC Posture
Company Posture

Summary

Reasoning

File numbers found in text: 333-272743

Date
August 22, 2023
Author
Jessica Livingston
Form
UPLOAD
Company
Prairie Operating Co.

Letter

United States securities and exchange commission logo August 22, 2023 Edward Kovalik Chief Executive Officer Prairie Operating Co. 8636 N. Classen Boulevard Oklahoma City, OK Re:Prairie Operating Co. Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on Form S-1 Filed July 27, 2023 File No. 333-272743 Dear Edward Kovalik: We have reviewed your amended registration statement and have the following comments. In some of our comments, we may ask you to provide us with information so we may better understand your disclosure. Please respond to this letter by amending your registration statement and providing the requested information. If you do not believe our comments apply to your facts and circumstances or do not believe an amendment is appropriate, please tell us why in your response. After reviewing any amendment to your registration statement and the information you provide in response to these comments, we may have additional comments. Unless we note otherwise, our references to prior comments are to comments in our July 17, 2023 letter. Amendment to Form S-1 filed July 27, 2023 Risk Factors Risks Related to Government Regulation Matters, page 13 1.We note your risk factor disclosure in response to comment 5 that the legal test for determining whether a particular crypto asset is a security “evolves over time,” and that the “SEC’s views in this area may have evolved over time and it is difficult to predict the direction or timing of any continuing evolution.” Please remove these statements as the legal tests are well-established by U.S. Supreme Court case law and the Commission and staff have issued reports, orders, and statements that provide guidance on when a crypto asset may be a security for purposes of the U.S. federal securities laws.

FirstName LastNameEdward Kovalik Comapany NamePrairie Operating Co. August 22, 2023 Page 2 FirstName LastNameEdward Kovalik Prairie Operating Co. August 22, 2023 Page 2 2.We further note your revised risk factor disclosure that: •“The SEC generally does not provide advance guidance or confirmation on the status of any particular crypto asset as a security;” •“Public statements by senior officials at the SEC indicate that the SEC does not intend to take the position that Bitcoin or Ether are securities (in their current form);” •“Bitcoin and Ether are the only crypto assets as to which senior officials at the SEC have publicly expressed such a view;” and •"With respect to all other crypto assets, there is currently no certainty under the applicable legal test that such assets are not securities."

Please remove or revise these statements in light of the fact that the Commission has identified numerous crypto assets as securities, the reference to public statements about Ethereum in its current form is inaccurate, the legal tests are well-established by U.S. Supreme Court case law, and the Commission and staff have issued reports, orders and statements that provide guidance on when a crypto asset may be a security for purposes of the U.S. federal securities laws. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of Prairie Operating Co. Factors Affecting Profitability, page 46 3.Refer to comment 13 and your revised response. Please state more specifically how the relationship of hash rate, electricity consumption, and mining costs impacts operating results. In that regard also please revise to include a comprehensive breakeven analysis for your Bitcoin mining operations that compares the cost to earn/mine one Bitcoin with the value of the Bitcoin. Your analysis should identify and explain the inputs used in your calculation. Business, page 54 4.Refer to comment 15 and your response that "the Company currently does not have, and does not intend to enter into, any agreements with mining pool operators." Also refer to your disclosures throughout the F-pages that reference mining pools and mining pool agreements. For example only: •Page F-39 states "[W]e participate in mining pools that pool the resources of groups of miners and split cryptocurrency rewards earned according to the “hashing” capacity each miner contributes to the mining pool." •Pages F-11 and F-44 state "[T]he Company has entered into digital asset mining pools by executing contracts with the mining pool operators to provide computing power to the mining pool.... In exchange for providing computing power, the Company is entitled to a fractional share of the fixed cryptocurrency award the mining pool operator receives (less digital asset transaction fees to the mining pool operator which are recorded as a component of cost of revenues) for successfully adding a block to the blockchain.

FirstName LastNameEdward Kovalik Comapany NamePrairie Operating Co. August 22, 2023 Page 3 FirstName LastName Edward Kovalik Prairie Operating Co. August 22, 2023 Page 3 •Page F-45 states "[T]he Company’s cryptocurrency mining costs consist primarily of direct costs of earning Bitcoin related to mining operations, including mining pool fees, fuel and natural gas costs, turbine rental costs, and mobile data center rental costs, but exclude depreciation and amortization, which are separately stated in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations."

Please revise to provide context to these statements consistent with the Company's response to the staff that there are no current agreements or intentions to enter into any agreements with mining pool operators. 5.We note your response to comment 16. Please revise to clarify whether you have any policy regarding how long you hold crypto assets that you receive as payment, or when you will sell such received crypto assets. If you have any such policy please state the policy. Also specifically state, quantitatively, the average period between receipt of your crypto assets and the subsequent sale, to date. 6.Refer to comment 19 and your revised disclosure on page 56. We restate the comment in part: please revise to disclose the manner in which Atlas is required to store your crypto assets, whether it is contractually required to hold your crypto assets in cold storage, and to what extent, what security precautions it is required to undertake, what inspection rights you have, and what type of insurance Atlas is required to have to protect you from loss or advise. If your agreement is silent on these terms, disclose that fact and how Atlas is holding your crypto assets and provide risk factor disclosure about the lack of such contractual requirements and any lack of insurance, inspection rights, or security precautions. Please contact Jessica Livingston at 202-551-3448 or John Dana Brown at 202-551-3859 with any questions. Sincerely, Division of Corporation Finance Office of Crypto Assets

Show Raw Text
United States securities and exchange commission logo
August 22, 2023
Edward Kovalik
Chief Executive Officer
Prairie Operating Co.
8636 N. Classen Boulevard
Oklahoma City, OK
Re:Prairie Operating Co.
Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on Form S-1
Filed July 27, 2023
File No. 333-272743
Dear Edward Kovalik:
            We have reviewed your amended registration statement and have the following
comments.  In some of our comments, we may ask you to provide us with information so we
may better understand your disclosure.
            Please respond to this letter by amending your registration statement and providing the
requested information.  If you do not believe our comments apply to your facts and
circumstances or do not believe an amendment is appropriate, please tell us why in your
response.
            After reviewing any amendment to your registration statement and the information you
provide in response to these comments, we may have additional comments.  Unless we note
otherwise, our references to prior comments are to comments in our July 17, 2023 letter.
Amendment to Form S-1 filed July 27, 2023
Risk Factors
Risks Related to Government Regulation Matters, page 13
1.We note your risk factor disclosure in response to comment 5 that the legal test for
determining whether a particular crypto asset is a security “evolves over time,” and that
the “SEC’s views in this area may have evolved over time and it is difficult to predict the
direction or timing of any continuing evolution.”  Please remove these statements as the
legal tests are well-established by U.S. Supreme Court case law and the Commission and
staff have issued reports, orders, and statements that provide guidance on when a crypto
asset may be a security for purposes of the U.S. federal securities laws.

 FirstName LastNameEdward Kovalik
 Comapany NamePrairie Operating Co.
 August 22, 2023 Page 2
 FirstName LastNameEdward Kovalik
Prairie Operating Co.
August 22, 2023
Page 2
2.We further note your revised risk factor disclosure that:
•“The SEC generally does not provide advance guidance or confirmation on the status
of any particular crypto asset as a security;”
•“Public statements by senior officials at the SEC indicate that the SEC does not
intend to take the position that Bitcoin or Ether are securities (in their current form);”
•“Bitcoin and Ether are the only crypto assets as to which senior officials at the SEC
have publicly expressed such a view;” and
•"With respect to all other crypto assets, there is currently no certainty under the
applicable legal test that such assets are not securities."

Please remove or revise these statements in light of the fact that the Commission has
identified numerous crypto assets as securities, the reference to public statements about
Ethereum in its current form is inaccurate, the legal tests are well-established by U.S.
Supreme Court case law, and the Commission and staff have issued reports, orders and
statements that provide guidance on when a crypto asset may be a security for purposes of
the U.S. federal securities laws.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of
Prairie Operating Co.
Factors Affecting Profitability, page 46
3.Refer to comment 13 and your revised response.  Please state more specifically how the
relationship of hash rate, electricity consumption, and mining costs impacts operating
results.  In that regard also please revise to include a comprehensive breakeven analysis
for your Bitcoin mining operations that compares the cost to earn/mine one Bitcoin with
the value of the Bitcoin.  Your analysis should identify and explain the inputs used in your
calculation.
Business, page 54
4.Refer to comment 15 and your response that "the Company currently does not have, and
does not intend to enter into, any agreements with mining pool operators." Also refer to
your disclosures throughout the F-pages that reference mining pools and mining pool
agreements. For example only:
•Page F-39 states "[W]e participate in mining pools that pool the resources of groups
of miners and split cryptocurrency rewards earned according to the “hashing”
capacity each miner contributes to the mining pool."
•Pages F-11 and F-44 state "[T]he Company has entered into digital asset mining
pools by executing contracts with the mining pool operators to provide computing
power to the mining pool.... In exchange for providing computing power, the
Company is entitled to a fractional share of the fixed cryptocurrency award the
mining pool operator receives (less digital asset transaction fees to the mining pool
operator which are recorded as a component of cost of revenues) for successfully
adding a block to the blockchain.

 FirstName LastNameEdward Kovalik
 Comapany NamePrairie Operating Co.
 August 22, 2023 Page 3
 FirstName LastName
Edward Kovalik
Prairie Operating Co.
August 22, 2023
Page 3
•Page F-45 states "[T]he Company’s cryptocurrency mining costs consist primarily of
direct costs of earning Bitcoin related to mining operations, including mining pool
fees, fuel and natural gas costs, turbine rental costs, and mobile data center rental
costs, but exclude depreciation and amortization, which are separately stated in the
Company’s consolidated statements of operations."

Please revise to provide context to these statements consistent with the Company's
response to the staff that there are no current agreements or intentions to enter into any
agreements with mining pool operators.
5.We note your response to comment 16.  Please revise to clarify whether you have
any policy regarding how long you hold crypto assets that you receive as payment, or
when you will sell such received crypto assets.  If you have any such policy please state
the policy.  Also specifically state, quantitatively, the average period between receipt of
your crypto assets and the subsequent sale, to date.
6.Refer to comment 19 and your revised disclosure on page 56. We restate the comment in
part: please revise to disclose the manner in which Atlas is required to store your crypto
assets, whether it is contractually required to hold your crypto assets in cold storage, and
to what extent, what security precautions it is required to undertake, what inspection rights
you have, and what type of insurance Atlas is required to have to protect you from loss or
advise. If your agreement is silent on these terms, disclose that fact and how Atlas is
holding your crypto assets and provide risk factor disclosure about the lack of such
contractual requirements and any lack of insurance, inspection rights, or security
precautions.
            Please contact Jessica Livingston at 202-551-3448 or John Dana Brown at 202-551-3859
with any questions.
Sincerely,
Division of Corporation Finance
Office of Crypto Assets