SecProbe.io

CORRESP
1
filename1.htm

SEC Correspondence

[LETTERHEAD OF WLRK]

 February 22, 2006

 VIA FACSIMILE

 Securities and Exchange Commission

 Division of Corporation Finance

 100 F St., N.E.

 Washington, D.C. 20549

 Attn:    Carmen Moncada-Terry

Re:
ConocoPhillips

Registration Statement on Form S-4

Filed January 11, 2006; File No. 333-130967

 Dear Ms. Moncada-Terry:

 Attached please find a markup of the tax disclosure section of the Form S-4, along with a copy of White & Case’s final opinion letters regarding the tax treatment of the merger.

 Please direct any questions concerning this letter to me at
(212) 403-1378 or David Feirstein at (212) 403-1106.

 Very truly yours,

 /s/ Benjamin M. Roth

 ConocoPhillips’ Reasons for the Merger

 The ConocoPhillips board of directors has approved the merger agreement and believes the complementary assets and strategies
of ConocoPhillips and BR, in combination with their personnel, technical expertise and financial strength, will create a company with capabilities and resources better positioned to succeed and grow in the new competitive energy marketplace. The
ConocoPhillips board of directors approved the merger agreement after ConocoPhillips’ senior management discussed with the ConocoPhillips board of directors the business, assets, liabilities, results and operations, financial performance and
prospects, and possibilities of continued growth of BR.

 ConocoPhillips believes the merger joins two well-managed companies, providing strategic and financial benefits to stockholders of ConocoPhillips. ConocoPhillips expects the benefits to include:

·
creation of a leading North American natural gas position comprised of high-quality, long-lived, low-risk gas reserves with significant unconventional resource potential and
enhanced production growth;

·
enhanced business mix with a higher proportion of exploration and production assets, assets in Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development countries and North American
natural gas;

·
significant free cash flow and synergy benefits; and

·
access to BR’s talented and technically capable workforce.

 Accounting Treatment

 The combination of the two companies will be accounted for as an acquisition of BR by ConocoPhillips using the purchase method of accounting.

 The purchase price (reflecting the cash consideration and the weighted
average price of ConocoPhillips’ common stock two days before, two days after and the first trading day after the transaction was announced on the evening of Monday, December 12, 2005) will be allocated to BR’s identifiable assets and
liabilities based on their respective estimated fair values at the closing date of the acquisition, and any excess of the purchase price over those fair values will be accounted for as goodwill. The valuation of BR’s assets and liabilities and
the finalization of plans for restructuring after the closing of the merger have not yet been completed. The allocation of the purchase price reflected in this proxy statement/prospectus may be revised as additional information becomes available.

 Material United States Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger

 The following is the opinion of White & Case
LLP, special U.S. tax counsel to BR, and sets forth, as of the date of this proxy statement/prospectus and subject to the assumptions and limitations contained herein, the material U.S. federal income tax consequences of the merger to U.S. holders
and non-U.S. holders (as defined below) of BR common stock. This

discussion does not address any tax consequences arising under the laws of any state, local or foreign jurisdiction. This discussion is based upon the Code,
the regulations of the U.S. Treasury Department and court and administrative rulings and decisions in effect and available on the date of this proxy statement/prospectus, any of which may change, possibly retroactively. Such a change could affect
the continuing validity of this discussion.

 [Rider 33A]

 For purposes of this discussion, the term “U.S.
holder” means a beneficial owner of BR common stock who for U.S. federal income tax purposes is:

·
a citizen or resident of the United States;

·
a corporation, or an entity treated as a corporation, created or organized in or under the laws of the United States or any state or political subdivision thereof;

 for U.S. federal income tax purposes the merger will constitute
a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code. These opinions will be based on certain assumptions and on representation letters provided by ConocoPhillips and BR to be delivered at the time of closing.

 ConocoPhillips and BR have not and will not seek any ruling from the Internal
Revenue Service regarding any matters relating to the merger, and as a result, there can be no assurance that the IRS will not disagree with or challenge any of the conclusions described herein. The following discussion assumes that the
merger will constitute a “reorganization” within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code.

 [Rider 35A]

 U.S. Holders

 If the merger qualifies as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code, then, based on the above assumptions and
qualifications, the material U.S. federal income tax consequences of the merger to U.S. holders of BR common stock are as follows:

·
subject to the paragraph captioned “—Additional Considerations—Recharacterization of Gain as a Dividend” below, upon exchanging BR common stock for a combination
of cash and shares of ConocoPhillips common stock in the merger, you will recognize gain (but not loss) in an amount equal to the lesser of (x) the cash (excluding any cash received in lieu of a fractional share of ConocoPhillips common stock)
that you receive in the merger and (y) the excess, if any, of (i) the sum of the cash (excluding any cash received in lieu of a fractional share of ConocoPhillips common stock) and the fair market value of the shares of ConocoPhillips
common stock you receive (including any fractional share of ConocoPhillips common stock you are deemed to receive and exchange for cash), over (ii) your tax basis in the BR common stock surrendered in the merger;

·
your aggregate tax basis in the shares of ConocoPhillips common stock that you receive in the merger (before reduction for the basis in any fractional share interest you are deemed
to receive and exchange for cash) will equal your aggregate tax basis in the BR common stock you surrendered in the merger, increased by the amount of taxable gain, if any, you recognize on the exchange (not including any

gain recognized as a result of cash received in lieu of a fractional share of ConocoPhillips common stock) and decreased by the amount of any cash received by you in the merger
(excluding any cash received in lieu of a fractional share of ConocoPhillips common stock); and

·
your holding period for the shares of ConocoPhillips common stock that you receive in the merger (including any fractional share interest that you are deemed to receive and exchange
for cash) will include your holding period for the shares of BR common stock that you surrender in the exchange.

 If you acquired different blocks of BR common stock at different times or at different prices, any gain or loss will be determined separately with respect
to each block of BR common stock, and the cash and shares of ConocoPhillips common stock you receive will be allocated pro rata to each such block of stock. In addition, your basis and holding period in your shares of ConocoPhillips common stock may
be determined with reference to each block of BR common stock.

 Taxation of Capital Gain. Except as described under “—Additional Considerations—Recharacterization of Gain as a Dividend” below, gain that you recognize in connection with the merger generally will constitute
capital gain and will constitute long-term capital gain if you have held (or are treated as having held) your BR common stock for more than one year as of the date of the merger. If you are a non-corporate holder of BR common stock, long-term
capital gain generally will be taxed at a maximum U.S. federal income tax rate of 15%.

 Additional Considerations—Recharacterization of Gain as a Dividend. All or part of the gain you recognize could be treated as ordinary dividend income rather than capital gain if (i) you are a
significant stockholder of ConocoPhillips or (ii) your percentage ownership, taking into account constructive ownership rules, in ConocoPhillips after the merger is not meaningfully reduced from what your percentage ownership would have been if
you had received solely shares of ConocoPhillips common stock rather than a combination of cash and shares of ConocoPhillips common stock in the merger. This could happen, for example, because of ownership of

 Rider 33A

 This discussion is also based on certain representations that have been provided by ConocoPhillips and BR as of the date of this proxy
statement/prospectus and the assumption that such representations will be true, accurate and complete in all respects as of the completion of the merger.

 Rider 35A

 BR has received an opinion of White &
Case LLP, dated as of the date of this proxy statement/prospectus, to the effect that the merger for U.S. federal income tax purposes will constitute a “reorganization” within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code.

 In rendering its opinion, White & Case LLP has relied, among other
things, on (i) representations and covenants made by ConocoPhillips and BR, including those contained in representation letters provided by ConocoPhillips and BR as of the date of this proxy statement/prospectus and in the merger agreement, and
(ii) certain assumptions, including an assumption regarding the completion of the merger in the manner contemplated by the merger agreement and this proxy statement/prospectus. In addition, White & Case LLP’s opinion assumes the
absence of changes in existing facts or in law between the date of this proxy statement/prospectus and the effective time of the merger, and that all of the representations and covenants made by ConocoPhillips and BR will continue to be true and
accurate in all respects as of the effective time of the merger. If any of the representations, covenants or assumptions are inaccurate, incomplete or untrue or any of the covenants are breached, White & Case LLP’s opinion contained
herein could be affected.

 U.S. Federal Income Tax Treatment of the Merger

 Subject to the assumptions, qualifications and limitations set forth herein, the merger for U.S. federal income tax purposes will constitute a
“reorganization” within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code.