SEC Company Response from Riot Platforms, Inc. (RIOT) (CIK 0001167419) (RIOT) — Jan 29, 2019
Riot Platforms, Inc. (RIOT) (CIK 0001167419)
Date: Jan. 29, 2019 · CIK: 0001167419 · Accession: 0001079973-19-000048
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
File numbers found in text: 001-33675
Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm
Correspondence
January 29, 2019
VIA EDGAR AND FEDERAL EXPRESS
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Division of Corporation Finance
100 F Street, N.E.
Washington, D.C. 20549
Re:
Riot Blockchain, Inc.
Shelf Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed July 10, 2018, as amended December 12, 2018 and January 3, 2019.
Ladies and Gentlemen:
We are in receipt of the letters, dated July 19, 2018, August 2, 2018, and December 18, 2018 addressed to Riot Blockchain, Inc. (the "Company") from the staff (the "Staff") of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") regarding their review of the above referenced filings of the Company including, specifically, the shelf registration statement on Form S-3, File No. (333−226111) (the "Registration Statement"), filed on July 10, 2018 and amended on December 12, 2018 and on January 03, 2019, seeking to register units of the Company's stock (its "Stock") under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the associated current, quarterly, and annual reports of the Company filed with the Commission over the last year (File No. 001-33675)(collectively, the "Filings").
The Company has filed a second amendment to the Registration Statement on Form S-3/A on January 03, 2019, as well as an amendment number 1 to its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Period Ended September 30, 2018, filed on January 11, 2019 (the "Q3 2018 Report"), and, as applicable, prepared disclosures therein in response to the Staff's comments regarding the Registration Statement and the Filings.
To assist in your review of the Company's responses to the comments set forth in the Staff's letters, the Company has set forth below in full in italicized text the comments contained in the letter, together with its responses.
Riot Blockchain, Inc. 202 6th Street, Suite 40 ● Castle Rock, CO 80104 ● Tel. (303) 974 - 2000
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
January 29, 2019
Page 2
Amendment No. 1 to Form S-3
Digital Currency Mining Operations, page 3
1.
Please revise to expand your disclosure regarding the number of miners that are currently operating at your facility, and whether there are any expected changes that will correspond with the decreases in the amount of rent.
Response
The Company has revised its disclosure to clearly that it has deployed 8,000 miners, including 7,500 model S9 and 500 model L3+ miners, in its Oklahoma City, Oklahoma facility, and that the disclosed changes to its lease agreement for that facility will not affect the number of miners it deploys there, but rather reflect a renegotiation of the previous agreement reflecting the changing economics of the relationship between the Company's subsidiary, Kairos Global Technology, Inc., and its landlord, 7725 Reno #1, L.L.C. For the Staff's convenience, the full text of the disclosure is included as follows:
Form S-3/A, About Riot Blockchain, Digital Currency Mining Operations, page 3:
"Overview of Mining Operations
The primary focus of the Company is our digital currency mining operations. Digital currencies are digital or virtual currencies used as a medium of exchange outside of the traditional state-backed fiat currencies. Digital or "crypto" currencies rely on complex cryptographically recorded data entries known as "blocks" on decentralized digital ledger system known as a blockchain. Blocks are added to the blockchain chronologically and, once added, are unchangeable. Thus, digital currencies are seen as a secure means of storing and recording information regarding a transaction or set of transactions. To incentivize the creation of blocks for the blockchain, digital currency tokens are awarded on a per block basis for block creation, a process which is known in the industry as mining.
The Company's mining operations focus primarily on bitcoin mining. Bitcoin mining entails solving complex mathematical problems using custom designed and programmed application-specific integrated circuit computers (referred to as "miners"). Bitcoin miners provide transaction verification services to a given blockchain by solving complex algorithms to encode additional blocks into the blockchain, which blocks serve as immutable records of transactions once added to the blockchain. When a miner is successful in adding a block to the blockchain, it is rewarded with a fixed number of bitcoin. Blocks are added to the blockchain on a first-to-finish basis, meaning that the first miner to solve an algorithm and verify a given transaction is the only miner to receive a bitcoin reward. This first-to-finish environment has created a computing power arms race whereby miners are encouraged through competition to allocate ever-increasing computing power (known as "hash rate") to solving algorithms. The resulting energy costs are substantial, and, in light of the recent decline in the market price of bitcoin and other "benchmark" digital currencies such as bitcoin cash, litecoin, and ethereum, the profitability of mining operations has been reduced as competition increases to solve each block. The Company's digital currency mining operations operate at a maximum hash rate of 95 petahash per second.
In response to these factors, the Company has entered into mining pools, whereby multiple miners allocate their collective computing powers to solving a given algorithm thereby increasing the collective hash rate devoted to a given algorithm. By pooling their efforts, miners in a pool are more likely to verify a given transaction and add a block to the Blockchain than miners acting individually. Pool miners are awarded a fractional reward based on the hash rate each contributed to the pool on a given successful transaction, regardless of whether the individual miner actually solved the applicable algorithm. Miners are allocated a share of every reward obtained by the pool operator, and thus the risk of not solving the algorithm first is reduced. The Company participates in pools on an at-will basis, and is under no obligation to remain in a given pool and may terminate its engagement with a given pool at any time. Presently, management believes participating in mining pools is the most efficient means of mining digital currencies, but is under no obligation, nor does it provide any assurance that it will continue to do so in the future.
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
January 29, 2019
Page 3
Oklahoma City Mining Facility
Beginning in February of 2018, we relocated our mining operations to our Oklahoma City facility, which is leased by our subsidiary, Kairos. As of the date of this prospectus, we moved all of our 8,000 digital currency miners, which includes 7,500 model S9 and 500 model L3+ miners to our Oklahoma City facility. These miners have been installed and operational since being deployed in June of 2018. Kairos leased the Oklahoma City facility from 7725 Reno #1, L.L.C. ("7725 Reno") by a lease agreement dated February 27, 2018, as amended on March 26, 2018 (the "Lease"). Effective as of November 29, 2018, Kairos amended the Lease with 7725 Reno by: (i) extending the initial term of the Lease through August 15, 2019; (ii) effective as of December 1, 2018, changing the monthly rent for the Lease as follows: (a) $235,000 for December of 2018, (b) $230,000 for January of 2019, and (c) $190,000 per month thereafter for the duration of the Lease, including any renewals; (iii) reducing the monthly electricity usage charges due under the Lease; (iv) providing that Kairos will reimburse 7725 Reno for up to $14,000 of the costs of installing electricity metering devices in the facility; and (v) Kairos will have the option to renew the Lease for up to two (2) three (3) month periods after the expiration of the initial term of the Lease. Under the initial terms of the Lease, the Company was required to pay for 12 megawatts of power per month, regardless of the actual
power consumption by its miners. Before upgrades were made to the software of our miners which made our mining activities much more energy efficient, this fixed cost arrangement was beneficial to the Company, as the Company had access to the allotted 12 megawatts of power each month during a time of peak demand for electric power. When the original lease was entered into, computing power, and therefore electricity, was in high demand among competitors in the bitcoin mining marketplace, securing access to 12 megawatts of electric power per month at a fixed price was important given those market conditions. Subsequent changes to the software of our miners and facility improvements have made the miners far more energy-efficient and therefore this fixed cost arrangement had become cost-inefficient, as the Company used less than the allotted 12 megawatts of power per month. Accordingly, for these reasons and other economic factors, the Company renegotiated the Lease.
The changes to the Lease do not impact the number of miners deployed at the facility. The Company's monthly electricity usage costs are now variable, rather than fixed under the Lease, and are assessed at a lower rate per kilowatt/hour for the electricity used. The reduction in the base rent was the product of negotiations between the Company and 7725 Reno and reflects changes to the economics of the Lease, rather than any change in the leased space or the number of deployed miners. These changes to the Lease will allow the Company to be more responsive to changes in the profitability of its digital currency mining operations.
The Company can, under the amended Lease, decide to reduce or temporarily switch off, any number of its miners in the facility and therefore reduce its variable electricity costs. Whereas under the original Lease, the Company would have still incurred the same electricity cost, regardless of actual electricity use. These changes allow the Company to monitor its monthly costs by optimizing its mining performance by operating its miners at less than full capacity during times of peak electricity rates.
Miners generate a substantial amount of heat when operating, which heat must be dissipated to avoid damaging the miners' circuitry. Heat dissipation requires significant electrical power. As the hash rate produced from operation of the miners is increased, so too is the electricity used both in operation and from heat dissipation. Accordingly, the electricity cost incurred in operation of the miners increases exponentially as the hash rate produced is increased. This increased electricity usage comes at substantial cost to the Company, and, accordingly, when the conversion spot price of bitcoin declines, the profitability of operating the mine at peak capacity declines. In addition to the need to dissipate the heat generated from the operation of the miners, environmental heat must also be dissipated. Under the original Lease, the Company incurred the same electricity cost regardless of electricity used, so it was negatively incentivized to reduce or halt its mining activities in response to dips in the conversion spot price of bitcoin. Under the amended Lease, however, the Company can reduce or even halt the operation of its miners temporarily in response to changing market conditions and obtain a corresponding reduction of its electricity costs for its facility. Furthermore, the Company expends electricity in dissipating environmental heat affecting its miners. As the environmental heat increases, so does the amount of electricity required to dissipate that heat. In times of extreme heat, the cost of dissipating the heat from operation of the miners can be substantial. Accordingly, running the Company's miners at peak capacity during times of high heat is more expensive for the Company. Because the amended Lease does not have a fixed power cost built in, the Company can reduce, increase, or even shut off the mining power devoted to the miners when environmental factors or market forces contract the net revenue generated from the Company's mining activities, without incurring the high fixed power cost required under the original Lease. This variability in the Company's power costs resulting from the operation of its mining facility makes the Company's mining activities more responsive to variables affecting the cost of digital currency mining, therefore bringing more of the Company's variable expenses under the Lease within management's control."
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
January 29, 2019
Page 4
Development of a U.S.-based Digital Currency Exchange, page 4
2.
Please revise to discuss the termination of your licensing and services agreement with Coinsquare, and to explain how the SynapseFi agreement will help launch your platform. It appears that the master services agreement with Shift Markets may be a material agreement. Please disclose the material terms of the agreement, including what aspects of the platform operations will be provided by Shift Markets pursuant to the agreement.
Response
The termination of the licensing and services agreement with goNumerical, Ltd. (d/b/a "Coinsquare") (the "Coinsquare Agreement") was a substantial material agreement for the Company and it represented a significant partnership in the development of the Company's planned U.S.-based digital currency exchange, RiotX. As disclosed in its Amendment No. 2 to its Registration Statement on Form S-3/A filed on January 3, 2019, the Coinsquare Agreement would have provided the Company with a comprehensive digital currency exchange platform inclusive of a Trading Engine and Digital Wallet Services, and would have been responsible for integrating the banking services software into RiotX, as well as for managing the day to day management, hosting, customer support and other operational services provided by RiotX to its end users. The contract price for the Coinsquare Agreement was $1,500,000 and equity outlays consisting of 9.9% of the equity in RiotX Holdings, Inc., the Company's subsidiary, and 450,000 shares of the Company's common stock. The Coinsquare Agreement therefore represented a definitive material agreement which the Company reported accordingly. The termination of the Coinsquare Agreement, which the Company disclosed on Form 8-K filed on September 18, 2018, caused the Company to seek replacement service providers for those aspects of RiotX that would have been provided by Coinsquare, including a Trading Engine.
The Company reported the SynapseFi Agreement on Form 8-K filed on October 29, 2018 under Item 1.01, entry into material definitive agreements because SynapseFi is a unique service provider whose software as service agreement provides RiotX with secure and efficient banking services software. The SynpaseFi Agreement will enable RiotX users to gain access to accredited banking institutions, and it will provide the Company with assurances through its Application Program Interfaces ("API") of the identity and location of RiotX users. The API provided by SynapseFi is nearly as important to the Company as the banking services it will provide, as the API enable the Company to better track and identify its users in order to prevent fraud and improper use of its RiotX exchange. As the Company has previously disclosed, regulatory compliance has been and continues to be a top priority for its development of RiotX, including complying with territorial restrictions on the exchange of digital currencies. SynapseFi's API will enable to Company to know where its end users are when they access RiotX, thereby enabling the Company to prevent, for example, a user from Montana, a state where the exchange of digital currencies is permitted, from traveling to neighboring Wyoming, where the exchange of digital currencies is not permitted, and using RiotX there. The SynapseFi Agreement is therefore not just material to the development of RiotX, but is also material to the Company.
The Company acknowledges th