SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Probe Scores Topics IPO Watchlist Monthly Activity About API

SEC Company Response from JACKSONVILLE BANCORP INC (CIK 0001172097) — Nov 17, 2004

JACKSONVILLE BANCORP INC (CIK 0001172097)
Date: Nov. 17, 2004 · CIK: 0001172097 · Accession: 0000943374-04-001091

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

Date
November 17, 2004
Author
Alan Schick
Form
CORRESP
Company
JACKSONVILLE BANCORP INC (CIK 0001172097)

Letter

November 17, 2004 Via Overnight Delivery Angela Jackson Staff Accountant U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Division of Corporation Finance 450 Fifth Street, NW Washington, DC 20549

Re: Jacksonville Bancorp, Inc. Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 22, 2004 File No. 0-49792

Dear Ms. Jackson:

I am writing in response to the staff's letter to Ms. Diana S. Tone regarding the above referenced filing, and as a follow-up to my discussions with you yesterday. As I stated in our discussion, the audit committee of Jacksonville Bancorp, Inc.'s board of directors decided to replace its existing auditors following the receipt of bids from a number of accounting firms, including McGladrey & Pullen. The decision to change auditing firms was not based upon any dissatisfaction with McGladrey & Pullen. In fact, the decision to change outside auditors is not going to occur until Jacksonville Bancorp, Inc.'s 2004 audit has been completed and the Annual Report on Form 10-K has been filed. This will occur on or about March 29, 2005.

Clearly, Jacksonville Bancorp, Inc. does not view the change in auditors as a "dismissal", and we confirm that McGladrey & Pullen did not resign or decline to stand for reelection.

Jacksonville Bancorp, Inc. submits that while the disclosure in its Form 8-K does not fall within enumerated items of Item 304(a)(1)(i) of Regulation S-K, the disclosure accurately reflects the facts surrounding the decision, Jacksonville Bancorp, Inc. feels that it would be misleading to characterize the decision to change accountants as a "dismissal." We therefore respectfully request that the disclosure as originally stated in the Current Report on Form 8-K be left unchanged. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned.

Very truly yours,
/s/ Alan Schick
--------------------
Alan Schick

Show Raw Text
<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>CORRESP
<SEQUENCE>1
<FILENAME>filename1.txt
<TEXT>

              [Letterhead of Luse Gorman Pomerenk & Schick, P.C.]

(202) 274-2008                                              aschick@luselaw.com

November 17, 2004

Via Overnight Delivery

Angela Jackson
Staff Accountant
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Division of Corporation Finance
450 Fifth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20549

         Re:      Jacksonville Bancorp, Inc.
                  Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 22, 2004
                  File No. 0-49792

Dear Ms. Jackson:

     I am  writing  in  response  to the  staff's  letter  to Ms.  Diana S. Tone
regarding the above referenced filing, and as a follow-up to my discussions with
you  yesterday.  As  I  stated  in  our  discussion,   the  audit  committee  of
Jacksonville Bancorp,  Inc.'s board of directors decided to replace its existing
auditors  following  the  receipt  of bids  from a number of  accounting  firms,
including  McGladrey & Pullen.  The  decision to change  auditing  firms was not
based upon any dissatisfaction with McGladrey & Pullen. In fact, the decision to
change outside auditors is not going to occur until Jacksonville Bancorp, Inc.'s
2004 audit has been completed and the Annual Report on Form 10-K has been filed.
This will occur on or about March 29, 2005.

     Clearly, Jacksonville Bancorp, Inc. does not view the change in auditors as
a "dismissal",  and we confirm that McGladrey & Pullen did not resign or decline
to stand for reelection.

     Jacksonville  Bancorp,  Inc.  submits that while the disclosure in its Form
8-K does not fall within  enumerated  items of Item  304(a)(1)(i)  of Regulation
S-K, the  disclosure  accurately  reflects the facts  surrounding  the decision,
Jacksonville Bancorp, Inc. feels that it would be misleading to characterize the
decision to change  accountants  as a  "dismissal."  We  therefore  respectfully
request that the  disclosure as originally  stated in the Current Report on Form
8-K be left unchanged.  Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to
contact the undersigned.

                                  Very truly yours,

                                 /s/ Alan Schick
                                 --------------------
                                     Alan Schick

cc:      Diana S. Tone, Chief Financial Officer

</TEXT>
</DOCUMENT>