SEC Comment Letter for HYSTER-YALE, INC. (HY) (CIK 0001173514) (HY) — Dec 6, 2005
HYSTER-YALE, INC. (HY) (CIK 0001173514)
Date: Dec. 6, 2005 · CIK: 0001173514 · Accession: 0000000000-05-061008
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
File numbers found in text: 333-89248
Referenced dates: November 8, 2005
Show Raw Text
<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>LETTER
<SEQUENCE>1
<FILENAME>filename1.txt
<TEXT>
Mail Stop 6010
December 6, 2005
Via U.S. Mail and Facsimile to (503) 721-1300
Michael K. Smith
Chief Financial Officer
NMHG Holding Co.
650 NE Holiday Street, Suite 1600
Portland, OR 97232
Re: NMHG Holding Co.
Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2004
Filed March 15, 2005
Form 10-Q for the Fiscal Quarters Ended March 31, 2005,
June 30, 2005 and September 30, 2005
File No. 333-89248
Dear Mr. Smith:
We have reviewed your response letter dated November 8, 2005
and subsequent filings and have the following additional comments.
We have limited our review to only your financial statements and
related disclosures and do not intend to expand our review to
other
portions of your documents. Where indicated, we think you should
revise your document in response to these comments. If you
disagree,
we will consider your explanation as to why our comment is
inapplicable or a revision is unnecessary. Please be as detailed
as
necessary in your explanation. In some of our comments, we may
ask
you to provide us with information so we may better understand
your
disclosure. After reviewing this information, we may raise
additional comments.
Please understand that the purpose of our review process is
to
assist you in your compliance with the applicable disclosure
requirements and to enhance the overall disclosure in your filing.
We look forward to working with you in these respects. We welcome
any questions you may have about our comments or any other aspect
of
our review. Feel free to call us at the telephone numbers listed
at
the end of this letter.
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004
Note 2. Significant Accounting Policies, page F-8
Revenue Recognition
1. Please refer to prior comment 1. Please explain the facts and
circumstances of transactions where you retain title to products
and
record the sale at shipment. Your response should include the
rights
and obligations of you and the distributor and why you believe
revenue recognition is appropriate at shipment. Refer to Question
2
of SAB 104 in your response.
2. Explain in greater detail the annual return allowance. Tell us
how these returns are estimated at the time of shipment. Explain
if
returns are for credit or if parts can be returned for cash.
Indicate the percentages that may be returned annually and provide
us
with a schedule of the activity in the related reserve account,
expressed in dollars, for each of the last three fiscal years.
Relate these to dollar parts sales during the same periods. Also,
tell us if there any limitations on the return of parts. That is,
if
parts of any age may be returned, it appears that you are at risk
of
a loss of utility in the goods as a result of physical
deterioration,
obsolescence, changes in price levels and other causes. Tell us
how
your accounting considers this risk.
Note 16. Equity Investments and Related Party Transactions, page
F-35
3. Please refer to prior comment 3. We have the following
additional
comments:
* Please tell us your policy for accounting for management fees
from
your parent company. We note that it is NACCO`s policy to charge
fees for services provided by the corporate headquarters to its
operating subsidiaries. Explain how your policy is consistent
with
your parent company`s policy and SAB Topic 1-B.
* We note the disclosure in Note 18 of NACCO`s Form 10-K for the
period ended December 31, 2004, that during 2004 NACCO "elected to
reduce the fees charged to NMHG in support of NMHG`s investment in
new product development and related programs." Please reconcile
this
disclosure with your response.
* It appears that these fees in the past have historically
included
internal audit fees and "stewardship activities." Please tell us
in
greater detail why you believe that your historical income
statement
reflects all costs of doing business, including costs incurred by
NACCO on your behalf if these fees are excluded in fiscal year
2004.
Refer to SAB Topic 1-B in your response.
We may have additional comments after reviewing your response.
As appropriate, please amend your filing and respond to these
comments within 10 business days or tell us when you will provide
us
with a response. You may wish to provide us with marked copies of
the amendment to expedite our review. Please furnish a cover
letter
with your amendment that keys your responses to our comments and
provides any requested information. Detailed cover letters
greatly
facilitate our review. Please understand that we may have
additional
comments after reviewing your amendment and responses to our
comments.
We urge all persons who are responsible for the accuracy and
adequacy of the disclosure in the filing to be certain that the
filing includes all information required under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that they have provided all information
investors require for an informed decision. Since the company and
its management are in possession of all facts relating to a
company`s
disclosure, they are responsible for the accuracy and adequacy of
the
disclosures they have made.
You may contact Kevin Kuhar, Staff Accountant, at (202) 551-
3662 or me at (202) 551-3554 if you have questions regarding these
comments on the financial statements and related matters. In this
regard, do not hesitate to contact Martin James, Senior Assistant
Chief Accountant, at (202) 551-3671.
Sincerely,
Angela Crane
Branch Chief
Michael K. Smith
NMHG Holding Co.
December 6, 2005
Page 1
</TEXT>
</DOCUMENT>