SEC Company Response from Whitestone REIT (WSR) (CIK 0001175535) (WSR) — Oct 22, 2008
Whitestone REIT (WSR) (CIK 0001175535)
Date: Oct. 22, 2008 · CIK: 0001175535 · Accession: 0001188112-08-002936
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
Referenced dates: October 9, 2008
Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm
t63847_corresp.htm
October
22, 2008
Via
EDGAR Submission and
Overnight
Delivery
U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission
Division
of Corporation Finance
100 F St.
Street, NE, Mailstop 4561
Washington,
D.C. 20549
Attn: Daniel
L. Gordon, Branch Chief
Re:
Whitestone REIT (the
“Company”)
Form 10-K for the Year Ended
December 31, 2007
Form
10-Qs for the Quarters Ended March 31, 2008 and June 30,
2008
Dear Mr.
Gordon:
We have reviewed the Staff’s letter
dated October 9, 2008, regarding the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10−K for
the year ended December 31, 2007 (the “Annual
Report”) and Quarterly Reports on Form 10−Q for the quarters ended March
31, 2008 and June 30, 2008 (the “Form
10−Qs”) and have prepared the following responses to your comments. For
ease of reference, we have reproduced the comments in their entirety below. In
addition, we have attached to this response letter the forms of the Amendment
No. 2 to the Annual Report and Amendment No. 1 to the Form 10−Qs as Exhibit A, Exhibit B and Exhibit C,
respectively (collectively, the “Amendments”),
that the Company proposes to file in response to the Staff’s comments. The
Company would propose to file the Amendments once the Staff confirms that it
does not have any additional comments relating to the disclosure contained in
the Amendments.
Form 10-K for the Year Ended
December 31, 2007
Item 5. Market for
Registrant’s Common Equity_ Related Shareholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of
Securities, page 18
1.
You disclose that shareholders
that received approximately 64,000 shares issued under your dividend
reinvestment plan on or after October 2, 2006, could be entitled to
rescission rights. Please tell us how you determined that these shares
should be classified as shareholders’ equity and not as a
liability.
RESPONSE:
We note the Staff’s comment and acknowledge that approximately 64,000
shares (the “Shares”) referenced above should have been classified as a
liability. We inadvertently classified the Shares as
equity. The amount recorded for the Shares is approximately
$608,000 (the share price of $9.50 multiplied by the approximate number of
shares, 64,000).
The
$608,000 misclassification equates to approximately 0.6% of liabilities or
1.2% of equity, earnings per share are not affected because the Shares are
considered common stock equivalents in both cases. Accordingly, we do not
believe the misclassification rises to a level of materiality requiring
restated financial statements, but advises the staff that in future
filings, beginning with its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
2008, the Company will classify the shares as a liability as long as the
rescission rights exist.
2600 South
Gessner
Phone (713)
827-9595
info@whitestonereit.com
Suite 500
Toll Free (866)
789-7348
www.whitestonereit.com
Houston, Texas
77063
Fax (713)
465-8847
Item 7. Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, page
21
Liquidity and Capital
Resources, page 25
2.
You
disclose that your $10.0 million mortgage loan is payable in equal monthly
installments of principal and interest of $60,212. However, we note that
you have included the entire outstanding principal balance of this note in
the “More than 5 Years” column in your tabular presentation of contractual
obligations. In future filings, please revise this table and the table of
annual debt maturities included in Note 9 to include the principal
payments due by period.
RESPONSE: We note the Staff’s comment and
advise the Staff that in future filings, beginning with its Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2008, the Company will revise the above referenced table
and the table of annual debt maturities included in the notes to the financial
statements to include the principal payments due by period.
3.
In future filings, please
revise your tabular presentation of contractual obligations to include
your interest commitments under your interest-bearing debt in this table,
or provide textual discussion of this obligation below the table. If you
provide a textual discussion, the discussion should quantify the interest
payments using the same time frames stipulated in the table. Regardless of
whether you decide to include interest payments in the table or in textual
discussion below the table, you should provide appropriate disclosure with
respect to your assumptions of your estimated variable rate interest
payments.
RESPONSE:
We note the Staff’s comment and advise the Staff that in future filings,
beginning with our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company
will revise our tabular presentation of contractual obligations to include our
interest commitments under our interest-bearing debt.
Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements, page F-7
Note 9. Debt, page
F-14
4.
Please
disclose in future filings whether you are in compliance with the
covenants in your various loan
agreements.
RESPONSE:
We note the Staff’s comment and advise the Staff that in future filings,
beginning with its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, the
Company will disclose whether or not we are in compliance with the covenants in
our various loan agreements.
Exhibits 31.1 and
31.2
5.
We
refer you to paragraph 4 of your certifications and note that it is
missing the words “and internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))” and also missing
paragraph 4(b) related to internal control over financial reporting.
Please note that the certifications must be exactly as set forth in Item
601(b)(31)(i) of Regulation S-K. Please file an abbreviated amendment to
your Form 10-K that consists of the cover page, explanatory note,
signature page and paragraphs 1, 2, 4, and 5 of the
certifications.
RESPONSE:
In response to the Staff’s comment, the Company has revised the certifications
required by Item 601(b)(31) of Regulation S-K as set forth in the Company’s
proposed amendment attached hereto as Exhibit A.
Additionally, the Company intends to amend its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2008 to include the required language in Exhibit 31, as set forth in
Exhibit B
attached hereto.
2
Form 10-Q for the Quarter
Ended June 30, 2008
Note 10. Related-Party
Transactions, page 15
6.
Please
tell us how you determined to record a gain of approximately $3.6 million
related to the settlement of litigation with Allen R. Hartman and Hartman
Management L.P., citing the authoritative literature upon which you relied
in reaching this conclusion. Specifically tell us how you determined that
the settlement was not a treasury stock transaction subject to the
provisions of ARB 43, Chapter 1B; APB Opinion No. 6, paragraphs 12 and 13;
and APB Opinion No. 9, paragraph
28.
RESPONSE:
The $3.6 million gain related to the settlement was accounted for as a
nonreciprocal transfer to owners in accordance with APB Opinion No. 29,
paragraphs 3.d., 18 and 23.
§
Paragraph 3.d. states “An
entity’s reacquisition of its outstanding stock is an example of a
nonreciprocal transfer”, and paragraph 23 states “Other nonreciprocal
transfers of nonmonetary assets to owners should be accounted for at fair
value if the fair value of the nonmonetary asset distributed is
objectively measureable and would be clearly realizable to the
distributing entity in an outright sale at or near the time of the
distribution.” Paragraph 18 states “A transfer of a nonmonetary
asset to a stockholder or to another entity in a nonreciprocal transfer
should be recorded at the fair value of the asset transferred, and a gain
or loss should be recognized on the disposition of the
asset.”
§
The properties distributed to
the owner were objectively measured and realizable by the Company at or
near the time of the distribution. Independent appraisals were
performed to determine the fair value of the
properties.
o
The $3.6 million gain was
calculated in accordance with FAS 141, paragraphs 5, 6 and A6 of paragraph
14. The gain of $3.6 million equals the fair value of the
nonmonetary assets ($11.4 million) minus the carrying value of the
nonmonetary assets ($7.8
million).
§
Paragraph 5. states “Exceptions
to that general condition include (a) the gain or loss that is recognized
if the fair value of noncash assets given as consideration differ from
their carrying amounts on the acquiring entity’s
books.”
§
Paragraph 6. states
“measurement is based on the fair value of the consideration given or the
fair value of the asset (or net assets) acquired, whichever is more
clearly evident and, thus, more reliably measurable.” The property
appraisals provided a more clearly evident fair value, as there is no
market for the common stock and operating units exchanged for the
property.
o
The settlement was an exchange
of nonmonetary assets (the properties) for ownership interests consisting
of common stock and operating partnership units. The fair value
of the properties was allocated to the common stock ($2.4 million) and the
operating partnership units ($9.0 million) on a pro rata basis based on
the number of respective shares and units which were deemed to be equally
valued.
o
The common stock was recorded
as a treasury stock transaction in accordance with the provisions of ARB
43, Chapter 1B; APB Opinion No. 6, paragraphs 12 and 13; and APB Opinion
No. 9, paragraph 28. Treasury stock was debited for $2.4
million and the assets exchanged were credited for $2.4
million.
o
The operating partnership unit
transaction was accounted for using the purchase method in accordance with
FAS 141 A5. paragraph 14, which states “A5. Paragraph 14 continues the
practice established by Opinion 16 of accounting for the acquisition of
noncontrolling equity interests of a subsidiary (commonly referred to as
minority interest) using the purchase method.” As such, the
fair value of the properties allocated to the operating partnership units
($9.0 million) reduced the carrying value of the minority interest shares
as a debit to minority interest of $4.8 million with the remaining $4.2
million being allocated to the Company’s remaining non-cash
assets.
3
A
summary of how the entire transaction was recorded is included
below:
Account
Debit
Credit
Description
Treasury
Stock
$
2,479,144.40
Received 293,961 common
shares
Minority
Interest
4,761,669.93
Received 1,068,451 operating
partnership units
Non-cash
Assets
4,249,185.67
Received 1,068,451 operating
partnership units
Assets
$
7,844,416.00
Carrying value of assets
exchanged for stock and operating partnership
units
Gain
3,645,584.00
Fair value of assets
exchanged minus carrying value of assets
exchanged
Item 4T. Controls and
Procedures, page 31
7.
We
note that you did not include the conclusions of your principal executive
and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions,
regarding the effectiveness of your disclosure controls and procedures as
of the end of the period covered by the report, based on the evaluation of
those controls and procedures required by paragraph (b) of Rule 13a-15 or
Rule 15d-15 of the Exchange Act. Please amend your filing to comply with
the disclosure requirements of Item 307 of Regulation S-K. In doing so,
please consider whether management’s failure to perform or complete its
assessment of disclosure controls and procedures, or to provide
management’s conclusion as to the effectiveness of your disclosure
controls and procedures, impacts its conclusions disclosed in the amended
filing. This comment also applies to your Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2008.
4
RESPONSE:
We note the Staff’s comment and acknowledge that we were required to include the
conclusions of our principal executive and principal financial officers
regarding the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures in
accordancewith Item 307 of Regulation S−K. The principal executive and principal
financial officers did perform such an assessment prior to filing the Form 10-Q
for each of the quarters ended March 31, 2008 and June 30, 2008, but the
required disclosure with respect to such assessment was inadvertently omitted
from each such Form 10-Q. In response to the Staff’s comment, the Company
intends to amend each such Form 10-Q in the manner set forth in Exhibit B and Exhibit C attached
hereto.
*****
In connection with responding to the
Staff’s comments, we acknowledge that:
·
the
Company is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in
the filings;
·
Staff
comments or changes to disclosure in response to Staff comments do not
foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to the
filings; and
·
the
Company may not assert Staff comments as a defense in any proceeding
initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal securities
laws of the United States.
In addition, the Company understands
that the Division of Enforcement has access to all information that it provides
to the Staff of the Division of Corporation Finance in their review of our
filings or in response to their comments on our filings.
Please direct any further questions or
comments concerning this response letter, the Annual Report, the Quarterly
Reports and the proposed amendments thereto to the undersigned at (713) 827-9595, extension 3027.
Sincerely,
/s/ David K.
Holeman
David K.
Holeman
Chief Financial
Officer
Attachments
(3)
5
Exhibit
A
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-K/A
(Amendment
No. 2)
(Mark
One)
x