SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Probe Scores Topics IPO Watchlist Monthly Activity About API

SEC Comment Letter for CytoDyn Inc. (CYDY) (CIK 0001175680) (CYDY) — Sep 3, 2015

CytoDyn Inc. (CYDY) (CIK 0001175680)
Date: Sept. 3, 2015 · CIK: 0001175680 · Accession: 0000000000-15-044377

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

Sentiment
Urgency
Document Type
Confidence
SEC Posture
Company Posture

Summary

Reasoning

Date
September 3, 2015
Author
/s/ Mellissa Campbell Duru
Form
UPLOAD
Company
CytoDyn Inc. (CYDY) (CIK 0001175680)

Letter

September 3, 2015 Via E-mail Steven M. Skolnick , Esq. Lowenstein Sandler LLP 1251 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10020

Re: Cyto Dyn, Inc. Schedule TO -I Filed August 24, 2015 File No. 005 -79349

Dear Mr. Skolnick :

We have reviewed the above referenced filing and have the following comments. In some of our comments, we may ask you to provide us with information so we may better understand your disclosure.

Please respond to this letter by amending your filing, by providing the requested information, or by advising us of when you will provide the requested response. If you do not believe our comments apply to your facts and circumstances or do not believe an amendment is appropria te, please tell us why in your response.

After reviewing any amendment to your filing and the information you provide in response to these comments, we may have additional comments.

Offer to Purchase

Will the Amended Warrants, the shares of Common Stock issued in exchange for the Eligi ble Notes in the Offer…, page 3

1. Clarify the exemption s from registration under the Securities Act to which you refer and upon which you intend to rely on for purposes of the issuance of Amended Warrants and shares of commo n stock pursuant to the offer. We may have further comment.

2. Please supplementally advise us of whether the composition of Eligible Securityholders (number and accredited status) is the same as at the time of the original issuance and if not, how the composition of warrant and note h olders has changed. We may have further comment.

Steven Skolnick , Esq. Lowenstein Sandler, LLP September 3, 2015 Page 2

Election Form

3. Please refer to representation (12), which requires holders agree to execute unidentified additional documents as a precursor to Cytodyn determining the validity of the tender of their securities. We also note vague references in representation (14) to the representations and warranties contained in the prior subscription agreement. Please revise to specify what holders are consenting to.

4. Refer to th e representation under (13). This representation requires a holder agree to a term of the offer which is seemingly outside of his/her control. Please re move the representation or advise. Note also our subsequent comment.

5. We note the representation that the offe r is not being offered to holders “in any State or other jurisdiction in which the Offer would not be in compliance with the laws of such State or other jurisdiction.” Please explain to us how limiting participation in this manner is consistent with Rule 13e-4(f)(8)(i). If the company is attempting to rely on Exchange Act Rule 13e -4(f)(9)(ii), we note that Rule 13e -4(f)(9)(ii) is restricted to state law, and that the disclosure does not appear to track the language of that rule. For guidance, refer to Ex change Act Release No. 34 -58597, Section II.G.1 (September 19, 2008).

We urge all persons who are responsible for the accuracy and adequacy of the disclosure in the filing to be certain that the filing includes the information the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and all applicable Exchange Act rules require. Since the company and its management are in possession of all facts relating to a company’s disclosure, they are responsible for the accuracy and adequacy of the disclosures they have made.

Steven Skolnick , Esq. Lowenstein Sandler, LLP September 3, 2015 Page 3

In responding to our comments, please provide a written statement from the company acknowledging that:

 the company is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in the filing;

 staff comments or changes to disclosure in response to staff comments do not foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to the filing; and

 the company may not assert staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of the Uni ted States.

Please contact the undersigned at (202) 551 -3757 with any questions.

Sincerely,
/s/ Mellissa Campbell Duru

Show Raw Text
September 3, 2015
Via E-mail
Steven M. Skolnick , Esq.
Lowenstein  Sandler LLP
1251 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10020

Re: Cyto Dyn, Inc.
 Schedule TO -I
Filed August 24, 2015
File No. 005 -79349

Dear Mr.  Skolnick :

We have reviewed the above referenced filing and have the following comments.  In
some of our comments, we may ask you to provide us with information so we may better
understand your disclosure.

Please respond to this letter by amending your filing, by providing the requested
information, or by advising us of when you will provide the requested response.  If you do not
believe our comments apply to your facts and circumstances or do not believe an amendment is
appropria te, please tell us why in your response.

After reviewing any amendment to your filing and the information you provide in
response to these comments, we may have additional comments.

Offer to Purchase

Will the Amended Warrants, the shares of Common Stock  issued in exchange for the Eligi ble
Notes in the Offer…, page 3

1. Clarify the exemption s from registration under the Securities Act to which you refer and
upon which you intend to rely on for purposes of the issuance of Amended Warrants and
shares of commo n stock pursuant to the offer.  We may have further comment.

2. Please supplementally advise us of whether the composition of Eligible Securityholders
(number and accredited status) is the same as at the time of the original issuance and if
not, how the composition of warrant and note h olders has changed.  We may have further
comment.

Steven Skolnick , Esq.
Lowenstein Sandler, LLP
September 3, 2015
Page 2

 Election Form

3. Please refer to representation  (12), which requires holders agree to execute unidentified
additional documents as a  precursor to Cytodyn determining the validity of the tender of
their securities.  We also note vague references in representation (14) to the
representations and warranties contained in the prior subscription agreement.  Please
revise to specify what holders are consenting to.

4. Refer to th e representation under (13).  This representation requires a holder agree to a
term of the offer which is seemingly outside of his/her control.  Please re move the
representation or advise.  Note also our subsequent comment.

5. We note the representation that the offe r is not being offered to holders “in any State or
other jurisdiction in which the Offer would not be in compliance with the laws of such
State or other jurisdiction.”  Please explain to us how limiting participation in this manner
is consistent with Rule 13e-4(f)(8)(i).  If the company is attempting to rely on Exchange
Act Rule 13e -4(f)(9)(ii), we note that Rule 13e -4(f)(9)(ii) is restricted to state law, and
that the disclosure does not appear to track the language of that rule.  For guidance, refer
to Ex change Act Release No. 34 -58597, Section II.G.1 (September 19, 2008).

We urge all persons who are responsible for the accuracy and adequacy of the disclosure
in the filing to be certain that the filing includes the information the Securities Exchange Act  of
1934 and all applicable Exchange Act rules require.   Since the company and its management are
in possession of all facts relating to a company’s disclosure, they are responsible for the accuracy
and adequacy of the disclosures they have made.

Steven Skolnick , Esq.
Lowenstein Sandler, LLP
September 3, 2015
Page 3

  In responding to our comments, please provide a written statement from the company
acknowledging that:

 the company is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in the filing;

 staff comments or changes to disclosure in response to staff comments do not foreclose
the Commission from taking any action with respect to the filing; and

 the company may not assert staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated by
the Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of the Uni ted States.

Please contact the undersigned at (202) 551 -3757 with any questions.

Sincerely,

 /s/ Mellissa Campbell Duru

Mellissa Campbell Duru
Special Counsel
Office of Mergers & Acquisitions