SEC Comment Letter for Bootie Beer CORP (CIK 0001204853) — Nov 2, 2005
Bootie Beer CORP (CIK 0001204853)
Date: Nov. 2, 2005 · CIK: 0001204853 · Accession: 0000000000-05-055756
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
Show Raw Text
<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>LETTER
<SEQUENCE>1
<FILENAME>filename1.txt
<TEXT>
Mail Stop 3561
September 23, 2005
Amy Trombly
1163 Walnut Street, Suite 7
Newton, MA 02461
RE: Jane Butel Corporation
Revised Preliminary Information Statement on Schedule 14C
Filed September 2, 2005
File No. 0-50104
Dear Mrs. Trombly:
We have reviewed your filing and your September 2, 2005
response letter and have the following comments. We have limited
our
review to your compliance with the requirements of Schedule 14C.
Where indicated, we think you should revise your document in
response
to these comments. If you disagree, we will consider your
explanation as to why our comment is inapplicable or a revision is
unnecessary. Feel free to call us at the telephone numbers listed
at
the end of this letter.
Revised Preliminary Information Statement on Schedule 14C
1. In addition to presenting the beneficial ownership information
as
of the record date, revise to update the beneficial ownership
table
as of the most recent practicable date, as required by Item 403 of
Regulation S-B. Also, revise the information statement to discuss
the security ownership of Theodore Smith prior to the merger with
Bootie Beer Company and as of the record date.
2. Please explain in greater detail why Section 607.1201 applies
to
the sale of all of your assets and some of your liabilities to
Mrs.
Butel. In this regard, address the applicability of this
statutory
provision while considering that 21st Century Technologies was a
holder of warrants, and not a creditor of your company, prior to
the
settlement of the dispute between Jane Butel Corporation and 21st
Century Technologies.
3. We reference your response analyzing the need for shareholder
approval of the change in control in connection with Mrs. Butel`s
sale of her Series A preferred stock. Clarify what you mean by
the
statement in your response letter that "[a]s this was a private
transaction, it did not require shareholder approval." Confirm,
if
true, that Florida corporate law did not require shareholder
approval
of the sale of shares to Geneva Atlantic Capital Corp. and the
subsequent issuance of shares of common stock to the shareholders
of
Bootie Beer Company.
* * * *
Please respond to these comments by filing a revised
preliminary consent solicitation statement as appropriate. When
you
respond, please furnish a cover letter that keys your responses to
our comments. If you believe that compliance with our comments is
not appropriate, please provide the basis for your view in your
response letter, which you should file electronically on EDGAR
under
the tag "CORRESP." Please also note the location of any material
changes made in the materials for reasons other than in response
to
specific staff comments. Also, note the requirements of Rule 14c-
5(e) of Regulation 14C and Rule 310 of Regulation S-T.
Please contact Derek Swanson, Staff Attorney, at (202) 551-
3366
or me at (202) 551-3810 with any other questions.
Sincerely,
/s/ Michele M. Anderson
Michele M. Anderson
Legal Branch Chief
cc: Amy Trombly
Via Facsimile: (309) 406-1426
??
??
??
??
Amy Trombly
September 23, 2005
Page 1
</TEXT>
</DOCUMENT>