SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Probe Scores Topics IPO Watchlist Monthly Activity About API

SEC Company Response from DTS, INC. (CIK 0001226308) — Dec 7, 2005

DTS, INC. (CIK 0001226308)
Date: Dec. 7, 2005 · CIK: 0001226308 · Accession: 0001104659-05-059549

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

Referenced dates: November 23, 2005

Date
December 7, 2005
Author
Flanigan
Form
CORRESP
Company
DTS, INC. (CIK 0001226308)

Letter

Via Edgarlink and Facsimile Securities and Exchange Commission Division of Corporation Finance Attention: Mr. Larry Spirgel, Assistant Director Re: DTS, Inc. Form 10-K for Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2004, Filed March 16, Form 10-Q for Fiscal Quarter Ended September 30, 2005 File No. 0-50335

Dear Mr. Spirgel, Mr. French and Ms. Bashaw:

This letter responds to the comments contained in your letter dated November 23, 2005. For your convenience, we have restated each comment and set forth our response immediately after each comment.

As requested in your comment letter, the Company hereby acknowledges that:

• the Company is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in the filings;

• staff comments or changes to disclosure in response to staff comments do not foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to the filings; and

• the Company may not assert staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of the United States.

Form 10-K for Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2004

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, page 24

1. We note that some portion of the 18% increase from 2003 to 2004 in technology and film licensing revenue was attributable to royalties due from prior periods. If the prior period royalties recognized in the current period account for a material part of the total change, please revise future filings to indicate the extent to which this significant factor affected your results of operations. For additional guidance, refer to Item 303 of Regulation S-K as well as section III of the Commission’s Interpretive Release on Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation which is located on our website at: http://www.sec.gov/rules/interp/33-8350.htm.

Response:

In future filings, if prior period royalties recognized in the current period account for a material part of the total change in revenue, we will indicate the extent to which such prior period royalties affected our results of operations.

Note 6 - Intangibles, page 73

2. In future filings, include the estimated aggregate amortization expense for each of the five succeeding fiscal years for patents and trademarks as well as acquired technology. Please refer to paragraph 45a.(3) of SFAS No. 142.

Response:

In future filings, we will include the estimated aggregate amortization expense for each of the five succeeding fiscal years for patents and trademarks as well as acquired technology, in accordance with paragraph 45a.(3) of SFAS No. 142.

Note 11 - Related Party Transactions, page 76

3. In the third paragraph in this section, you discuss a customer who is also an 18.8% owned affiliate. Please tell us in more detail about your relationship with this affiliate and how you account for your ownership interest.

Response:

In January 2000, we purchased 94 shares out of a total of 500 shares outstanding of this affiliate for $6,801. This represented an 18.8% interest. The affiliate is a reseller of cinema products. We sell our products to them on the same or similar terms as our other resellers. The affiliate does not rely solely on transactions with us to generate revenue.

We account for the investment in accordance with APB 18: The Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in Common Stock using the historical cost method. We based our

decision to account for this investment using the historical cost method on the fact that our investment has always been passive in nature, does not enable us to influence the operating or financial decisions of this affiliate, and we do not have board representation. Furthermore, through September 30, 2005, our percentage ownership has always been less than 20% and our investment has been nominal in value (less than $7,000).

If you have any further questions or wish to discuss the responses we have provided above, please call the undersigned at (818) 827-2255.

Very truly
yours,
/s/ Melvin
Flanigan

Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm

[DTS, Inc. letterhead]

December 7, 2005

Via
Edgarlink and Facsimile

Securities and Exchange Commission

Division of Corporation Finance

Mail Stop 3561

100 F Street, N.E.

Washington, DC  20549

Attention:                                         Mr. Larry
Spirgel, Assistant Director

Mr. Terry French, Accountant Branch Chief

Ms. Christine Bashaw, Staff Accountant

Re:                             DTS, Inc.

Form 10-K for Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2004, Filed March 16,
2005

Form 10-Q for Fiscal Quarter Ended September 30, 2005

File No. 0-50335

Dear Mr. Spirgel, Mr. French and Ms. Bashaw:

This letter responds to the comments contained in your
letter dated November 23, 2005.  For
your convenience, we have restated each comment and set forth our response
immediately after each comment.

As requested in your comment letter, the Company
hereby acknowledges that:

•                  the Company is responsible for the
adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in the filings;

•                  staff comments or changes to
disclosure in response to staff comments do not foreclose the Commission from
taking any action with respect to the filings; and

•                  the Company may not assert staff
comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any
person under the federal securities laws of the United States.

Form 10-K for Fiscal
Year Ended December 31, 2004

Management’s Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, page 24

1.              We
note that some portion of the 18% increase from 2003 to 2004 in technology and
film licensing revenue was attributable to royalties due from prior
periods.  If the prior period royalties
recognized in the current period account for a material part of the total
change, please revise future filings to indicate the extent to which this
significant factor affected your results of operations.  For additional guidance, refer to Item 303 of
Regulation S-K as well as section III of the Commission’s Interpretive
Release on Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operation which is located on our website at:  http://www.sec.gov/rules/interp/33-8350.htm.

Response:

In future filings, if
prior period royalties recognized in the current period account for a material
part of the total change in revenue, we will indicate the extent to which such
prior period royalties affected our results of operations.

Note 6 - Intangibles, page 73

2.              In
future filings, include the estimated aggregate amortization expense for each
of the five succeeding fiscal years for patents and trademarks as well as
acquired technology.  Please refer to paragraph
45a.(3) of SFAS No. 142.

Response:

In future filings, we will include the estimated
aggregate amortization expense for each of the five succeeding fiscal years for
patents and trademarks as well as acquired technology, in accordance with
paragraph 45a.(3) of SFAS No. 142.

Note 11 - Related Party
Transactions, page 76

3.              In the
third paragraph in this section, you discuss a customer who is also an 18.8%
owned affiliate.  Please tell us in more
detail about your relationship with this affiliate and how you account for your
ownership interest.

Response:

In January 2000, we purchased 94 shares out of a
total of 500 shares outstanding of this affiliate for $6,801.  This represented an 18.8% interest.  The affiliate is a reseller of cinema products.  We sell our products to them on the same or
similar terms as our other resellers. The affiliate does not rely solely on
transactions with us to generate revenue.

We account for the investment in accordance with APB
18:  The Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in
Common Stock using the historical cost method. We based our

2

decision to account for this investment using the historical cost
method on the fact that our investment has always been passive in nature, does
not enable us to influence the operating or financial decisions of this
affiliate, and we do not have board representation. Furthermore, through September 30,
2005, our percentage ownership has always been less than 20% and our investment
has been nominal in value (less than $7,000).

If you have any further questions or wish to discuss
the responses we have provided above, please call the undersigned at (818) 827-2255.

  Very truly
  yours,

  /s/ Melvin
  Flanigan

  Melvin Flanigan,

  Executive Vice
  President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer

cc:                                 Kirt
Shuldberg, Heller Ehrman LLP

3