SEC Company Response from SALOMON SMITH BARNEY AAA ENERGY FUND II LP (CIK 0001227268) — Oct 20, 2005
SALOMON SMITH BARNEY AAA ENERGY FUND II LP (CIK 0001227268)
Date: Oct. 20, 2005 · CIK: 0001227268 · Accession: 0000899140-05-000935
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
Referenced dates: September 27, 2005
Show Raw Text
<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>CORRESP
<SEQUENCE>1
<FILENAME>filename1.txt
<TEXT>
Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP
787 Seventh Avenue
New York, NY 10019
October 20, 2005
Mail Stop 4561
--------------
VIA EDGAR AND FEDEX
-------------------
Securities and Exchange Commission
Division of Corporation Finance
100 F Street, N.E.
Washington D.C. 20549
Re: Salomon Smith Barney AAA Energy Fund L.P. II (the "Fund")
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004
Filed March 16, 2005
File No. 0-50272
Ladies and Gentlemen:
On behalf of Citigroup Managed Futures LLC, the general partner of the Fund (the
"General Partner"), we respectfully submit below the General Partner's response
to the comment of the staff (the "Staff") of the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Commission") on the Fund's last Form 10-K in a letter dated
September 27, 2005 to Daniel R. McAuliffe, Chief Financial Officer of the
General Partner. For your convenience, the Staff's comment is indicated in
italics, followed by the General Partner's response.
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004
Statements of Income and Expenses, page F-8
Please tell us what consideration you gave to classifying the allocation to the
special limited partner as management fees within expenses. Upon review of
paragraph 3 of your advisory agreement, this allocation of special limited
partner units appears to be in essence additional compensation paid to your
advisor in return for management services.
In treating the allocation of redeemable units of limited partnership interest
to the special limited partner as an equity transaction as opposed to an expense
transaction, the General Partner considered the following:
1. Paragraph 3(a)(ii) of the investment advisory agreement states that the
Fund shall "allocate to the Advisor an annual Profit Share to its capital
account in the Partnership equal to 20% of New Trading Profits (as such
term is defined in the Limited Partnership Agreement) earned by
<PAGE>
Securities and Exchange Commission
October 20, 2005
Page 2
the Advisor for the Partnership during each calendar year in the form of
Units." This demonstrates that the allocation is an equity transfer of
partnership interests from one class of partners to another.
2. Paragraph .10 of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants'
(AICPA) Statement of Position (SOP) 95-2, Financial Reporting by Nonpublic
Investment Partnerships as amended by SOP 01-1, Amendment to Scope of SOP
95-2, Financial Reporting by Nonpublic Investment Partnerships, to Include
Commodity Pools, states that: "Many investment companies reflect such fees,
including the bonus portion, as an expense in the statement of operations.
If an investment company is organized as a limited partnership, however,
the payment may take the form of an allocation of earnings based on a
predetermined formula specified in the partnership agreement. In such
cases, some investment partnerships reflect this allocation of partnership
income through a reallocation of partners' net income from the limited
partners to the general partner within the equity section of the statement
of assets and liabilities rather than as an expense." Thus, SOP 95-2
permits allocations of partnership net income from one class of partner to
another to be reflected as an equity transaction rather than an expense.
3. Paragraph .13a of SOP 03-4, Reporting Financial Highlights and Schedule of
Investments by Nonregistered Investment Partnerships: An Amendment to the
Audit and Accounting Guide Audits of Investment Companies and AICPA SOP
95-2, Financial Reporting by Nonpublic Investment Partnerships, which
discusses the calculation of ratios of expenses and net investment income
to average net assets states that: "Generally, the determination of
expenses for computing those ratios should follow the presentation of
expenses in the fund's statement of operations. Accordingly, if the
manager's or general partner's incentive is structured as a fee rather than
an allocation of profits, the incentive fee would be factored into the
computation of an expense ratio. Because an incentive allocation of profits
is not presented as an expense, it should not be considered part of the
expense ratio. However, to avoid potentially significant inconsistencies in
ratio presentations based solely on the structuring of incentives as fees
or allocations, all incentives should be reflected in the disclosure in the
financial highlights. See paragraph 7.87 for an example of that
disclosure."
Based on the above, the General Partner treats the allocation as an equity
transaction in the statement of partners' capital. The General Partner presents
the expense ratio in the Fund's financial highlights before and after the
allocation, consistent with authoritative literature and industry practice for
both public and nonpublic investment partnerships.
* * * *
Pursuant to your comment letter, on behalf of the General Partner and the Fund,
we acknowledge that:
o the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in its 2004 Form 10-K is
the responsibility of the Fund;
o Staff comments or changes to disclosure in response to Staff comments
do not foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to
the Fund's 2004 Form 10-K; and
<PAGE>
Securities and Exchange Commission
October 20, 2005
Page 3
o the Fund represents that it will not assert Staff comments as a
defense in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person
under the federal securities laws of the United States.
* * * *
Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned
at (212) 728-8727.
Very truly yours,
/s/ Rita M. Molesworth
----------------------
Rita M. Molesworth
Enclosure
cc: Steven Jacobs, Branch Chief
Daniel R. McAuliffe
Jennifer Magro
Sean McKee
Gabriel Acri
</TEXT>
</DOCUMENT>