SEC Company Response from GRAN TIERRA ENERGY INC. (GTE) (CIK 0001273441) (GTE) — Sep 15, 2006
GRAN TIERRA ENERGY INC. (GTE) (CIK 0001273441)
Date: Sept. 15, 2006 · CIK: 0001273441 · Accession: 0001144204-06-038620
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
File numbers found in text: 333-111656, 333-132352
Referenced dates: May 10, 2006
Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm
Unassociated Document
September
15, 2006
Mr.
H.
Roger Schwall
Assistant
Director
Division
of Corporation Finance
Mail
Stop
7010
Washington,
D.C. 20549-7010
Re:
Gran
Tierra Energy Inc. (the
“Company”)
Amendment
No. 1 to Registration Statement on Form SB-2
Filed
April 21, 2006
File
No. 333-132352
Amendment
No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A for the fiscal year ended December
31,
2005
Filed
July 18, 2006
File
No. 333-111656
Dear
Mr.
Schwall:
This
is
in response to your comment letter of August 8, 2006 to Dana Coffield with
respect to the above-referenced filings. Pursuant to a conversation with staff,
the Company is separately responding to the comment related to the predecessor
financial statements of Dong Won Corporation. The Company will respond to the
remaining comments from the August 8, 2006 letter when we respond to your
comment letter of August 31, 2006. The Company intends to file Amendment No.
3
to Registration Statement No. 333-132352 and Amendment No. 3 to Form 10-KSB
when
we respond to your remaining comments from the August 8, 2006 and August 31,
2006 letters.
We
have
set forth below the comment related to the predecessor financial statements
of
Dong Won Corporation in your letter of August 8, 2006 in italics with the
Company’s response:
Form
10-KSB/A for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2005
Financial
Statements, page 20
General
2.
We
note your response to prior comment 24 in our letter dated May 10,
2006 in
which you explain that you did not acquire substantially all the
assets of
Don Won Corporation. Please tell us what percent of the net assets,
revenues and related results of operations and cash flows of Don
Won
Corporation you obtained when you acquired the 14 percent interest
in the
Palmar Largo joint venture and the 50 percent interests in the Nacatimbay
and Ipaguazu concessions.
We
continue to believe complete financial statements of the predecessor
entity are necessary to satisfy the requirements of Item 310(c) of
Regulation S-B; therefore, if you acquired only a component of the
business of Don Won Corporation, you should present financial statements
of the acquired component. These carve out financial statements should
be
prepared in accordance with the guidance provided at SAB Topic 1:B:1
and
should include a complete balance sheet, income statement and statement
of
cash flows.
September
15, 2006
Page
2
As
previously indicated, the accommodation for presenting Statements
of Gross
Revenues and Direct Lease Operating expenses in lieu of presenting
complete financial statements is not generally extended to situations
calling for the financial statements of a predecessor
entity.
RESPONSE:
Dong
Won
Corporation is a public Korea-based company involved in the provision of energy
and natural resources. The company’s common shares trade on the Korean Stock
Exchange and its reporting currency is the South Korea Won. According to public
information, net assets of Dong Won Corporation at December 31, 2004 (prior
to
the disposition of the Argentina assets) were $114.1 million. Based on the
acquisition cost of $7.0 million for Palmar Largo, Nacatimbay and Ipaguazu,
we
purchased 6% of the net assets of Dong Won Corporation. According to our audit
of the revenues, royalties and operating expenses, gross revenue of the 14%
interest in the Palmar Largo joint venture for the year was $4.7 million,
representing 8% of reported revenues for Dong Won Corporation of $57.7 million.
Revenues from Nacatimbay were minor and Ipaguazu was non-producing. Operating
expenses and royalties for the interest in Palmar Largo for the year were $1.9
million, approximately 3% of cost of sales for Dong Won Corporation. Dong Won
Corporation recorded an operating deficit of $27.5 million and operating cash
flow deficit of $9.4 million for the year due to results of operations that
were
not acquired by Gran Tierra.
Dong
Won
operates in Argentina as a branch of the parent company. The branch reports
its
financial information in Argentine pesos, and is in accordance with Argentine
GAAP to comply with statutory audit requirements. According to public
information for 2004 (prior to Gran Tierra’s acquisition of the Argentine
assets), the acquisition cost of $7 million for the interests at Palmar Largo,
Nacatimbay and Ipaguazu represents 55% of the net assets of the branch. Gross
revenue from the interest in Palmar Largo represented approximately 70% of
revenues of the branch for the year, and operating expenses and royalties for
Palmar Largo for the year were approximately 39% of cost of sales. Revenues
from
Nacatimbay were minor and Ipaguazu was non-producing. A calculation of the
percentage of operating results and cash flows acquired is not instructive
as
results for the branch include significant costs of operations, in particular,
that are not associated with the assets acquired. In other words, an assessment
of the component parts of operating profit and operating cash flow - that is,
revenue and expense - is appropriate.
At
the
time of the acquisition, Dong Won (Argentina) had the following oil and gas
interests:
1.
14%
interest Palmar Largo - operated by Pluspetrol - acquired by Gran
Tierra
for $6,969,559
2.
50%
interest Nacatimbay - operated by CGC - acquired by Gran Tierra for
$50,467
3.
50%
interest Ipaguazu - operated by CGC - acquired by Gran Tierra for
$12,588
4.
25%
interest El Chivil - operated by CGC - not acquired by Gran
Tierra
5.
25%
interest Surubi - operated by CGC - not acquired by Gran
Tierra
6.
50%
interest El Vinalar - operated by Dong Won - not acquired by Gran
Tierra
September
15, 2006
Page
3
We
understand that Dong Won Argentina also holds interests in two properties in
Bolivia, either directly or indirectly. We purchased Dong Won’s interests in
three of the six properties above, and did not purchase any of the other
interests that were operated by the branch, which would have entailed project
management responsibilities, with associated operational activities and
expenses.
On
the
basis of the above information, we have stated that we have not acquired
“substantially all” of the assets of Dong Won Argentina.
Topic
2,
Item 3(b) of the SEC Division of Corporate Finance Accounting Disclosure Rules
& Practices Training Manual states that “Acquisition of selected parts of an
entity may result in less than full financial statements.” Item 3(b)(3) further
states “the staff may accept audited statements of assets acquired and
liabilities assumed and statements of revenues and direct expenses if it is
impractical to prepare the full financial statements required by Regulation
S-X
[and, presumably, Regulation S-B] and explanation of that impracticality is
included in the filing.”
We
contend that it is not practical to prepare financial statements for Dong Won
Argentina. A full audit of the financials of the branch would involve an audit
of each of the six joint ventures, only three of which were acquired, and would
require the cooperation and commitment of Pluspetrol (the operator of Palmar
Largo) and CGC (the operator of Nacatimbay, Ipaguazu, Chivil and Surubi).
Furthermore, the translation of Dong Won financials from Argentine GAAP, pesos
and successful efforts accounting into U.S. GAAP, U.S. dollars, full-cost
accounting would need to be performed by Dong Won, who have divested their
interests in Argentina and have not maintained a staff in-country. Dong Won
would also be required to grant their consent to the inclusion of the re-defined
financials, which consent is not an obligation. The scope of the audit would
extend into an audit of tax matters and legal diligence, in addition to an
audit
of fixed assets, current assets and liabilities and longer-term obligations
that
were not acquired by Gran Tierra and were not associated with the assets
acquired by Gran Tierra. Ultimately, this exercise would not provide additional
meaningful information, in our view. We believe that the statement of revenues,
royalties and operating expenses provides investors with the complete financial
history of the acquired business.
We
consider that it may not be possible to provide audited financial statements
for
Dong Won Argentina. An audit would otherwise be impractical, involving a
significant time and cost, and would not provide additional material information
relevant to our acquisition.
Topic
2,
Item 3(b)(6) of the Training Manual states that “requests for substitution of
abbreviated financial information in lieu of full financial statements should
be
directed to DCAO prior to filing.” We wish to request for substitution of
abbreviated financial information on this basis.
We
appreciate your comment that the accommodation for presenting statements of
revenues and operating expenses in lieu of complete financial statements is
not
necessarily extended to situations calling for the financial statements of
a
predecessor entity. However, we understand that such accommodation may be
granted, and wish to have the staff consider the realities of our
situation.
September
15, 2006
Page
4
We
also
wish the staff to re-consider the perspective that the predecessor entity is
not
Dong Won but is the 14% interest in the Palmar Largo joint venture, and our
view
that the presentation of revenues, royalties and operating expenses and
corresponding pro forma financial statements are an accurate representation
of
the financial performance of the predecessor and impact of the Palmar Largo
acquisition.
Having
regard for our response, should the staff believe that complete financial
statements of the predecessor entity are necessary, we would request an
opportunity to discuss this issue further. If you have any questions, please
contact me at (704) 373-8862.
Sincerely,
/s/ Jason
H.
Scott
Jason
H. Scott
cc:
Donna
Levy
Dana
Coffield
James
Hart
Louis
Zehil
Jennifer
Gallagher
James
Murphy