SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Probe Scores Topics IPO Watchlist Monthly Activity About API

SEC Company Response from ENDEAVOUR SILVER CORP (EXK) (CIK 0001277866) (EXK) — Dec 13, 2012

ENDEAVOUR SILVER CORP (EXK) (CIK 0001277866)
Date: Dec. 13, 2012 · CIK: 0001277866 · Accession: 0001062993-12-005400

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

Sentiment
Urgency
Document Type
Confidence
SEC Posture
Company Posture

Summary

Reasoning

File numbers found in text: 001-33153

Referenced dates: December 4, 2012

Date
December 6, 2012
Author
Dan Dickson
Form
CORRESP
Company
ENDEAVOUR SILVER CORP (EXK) (CIK 0001277866)

Letter

December 6, 2012 Division of Corporation Finance United States Securities and Exchange Commission 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549 Attention: Tia Jenkins, Senior Assistant Chief Accountant Office of Beverages, Apparel and Mining

Dear Sirs/Mesdames:

Re: Endeavour Silver Corp. (“Endeavour”)

Response to First Comments

Form 40-F for Fiscal Year Ended December 31,

Filed April 2, 2012

File No. 001-33153

The following is Endeavour’s response to the Comment Letter dated December 4, 2012.

1.

We note that you do not address the mandatory exceptions, as set forth in paragraphs 14-17 and Appendix B of IFRS 1 that you applied upon the adoption of IFRS. To the extent that your financial statements reflect the use of mandatory exceptions, please identify for us the items or class of items to which the exceptions were applied and describe the accounting principle that was used and how it was applied. In addition and to the extent material, also qualitatively describe for us the impact on the financial condition, changes in financial condition and results of operations that the treatment specified by IFRS would have had absent these mandatory exceptions. Refer to paragraph 23 of IFRS

The Company’s financial statements did not retrospectively apply the IFRSs prior to the transition date (i.e. January 1, 2010) as required by IFRS 1, paragraphs 14-17. Furthermore, no items or class of items fell within the scope of the mandatory exceptions outlined in IFRS 1, paragraph B1.

Further, the Company understands it is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in the filing, staff comments or changes to disclosure in response to staff comments does not foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to the filing and the Company will not assert staff comments as a defense in any proceedings initiated by the Commission or any other person under the federal securities laws of the United States.

Yours truly,

“Dan Dickson”

Dan Dickson Chief Financial Officer

Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm

   Endeavour Silver Corp.: Correspondence - Filed by newsfilecorp.com

    Reply to:
    Dan Dickson

    Direct
      line:

    604-685-9775 x 236

    E-mail:
    ddickson@edrsilver.com

    File No.:
    001-33153

December 6, 2012

Division of Corporation Finance
United States Securities
and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, NE,
Washington, DC 20549

    Attention:
    Tia Jenkins, Senior Assistant

    Chief Accountant Office of Beverages,
      Apparel and Mining

Dear Sirs/Mesdames:

    Re:
    Endeavour Silver Corp. (“Endeavour”)

    Response to First Comments

    Form 40-F for Fiscal Year Ended December 31,
      2011

    Filed April 2, 2012

    File No. 001-33153

The following is Endeavour’s response to the Comment Letter
dated December 4, 2012.

    1.

      We note that you do not address the mandatory
      exceptions, as set forth in paragraphs 14-17 and Appendix B of IFRS 1 that
      you applied upon the adoption of IFRS. To the extent that your financial
      statements reflect the use of mandatory exceptions, please identify for us
      the items or class of items to which the exceptions were applied and
      describe the accounting principle that was used and how it was applied. In
      addition and to the extent material, also qualitatively describe for us
      the impact on the financial condition, changes in financial condition and
      results of operations that the treatment specified by IFRS would have had
      absent these mandatory exceptions. Refer to paragraph 23 of
  IFRS

The Company’s financial statements did not retrospectively
apply the IFRSs prior to the transition date (i.e. January 1, 2010) as required
by IFRS 1, paragraphs 14-17. Furthermore, no items or class of items fell within
the scope of the mandatory exceptions outlined in IFRS 1, paragraph B1.

Further, the Company understands it is responsible for the
adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in the filing, staff comments or changes
to disclosure in response to staff comments does not foreclose the Commission
from taking any action with respect to the filing and the Company will not
assert staff comments as a defense in any proceedings initiated by the
Commission or any other person under the federal securities laws of the United
States.

Yours truly,

“Dan Dickson”

Dan Dickson
Chief Financial Officer