SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Probe Scores Topics IPO Watchlist Monthly Activity About API

SEC Company Response from SuperCom Ltd (SPCB) (CIK 0001291855) (SPCB) — Dec 9, 2013

SuperCom Ltd (SPCB) (CIK 0001291855)
Date: Dec. 9, 2013 · CIK: 0001291855 · Accession: 0001178913-13-003537

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

File numbers found in text: 333-189810

Referenced dates: December 6, 2013, July 23, 2013

Date
December 9, 2013
Author
Assistant Director
Form
CORRESP
Company
SuperCom Ltd (SPCB) (CIK 0001291855)

Letter

United States Securities and Exchange Commission SuperCom Ltd. Amendment No. 2 to Registration Statement on Form F-1, Filed November 25, 2013 File No. 333-189810

Re:

Dear Ms. Ravitz:

Set forth below are the responses of SuperCom Ltd. (the “Company”) to the comments of the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Staff”) regarding Amendment No. 2 to its Registration Statement on Form F-1 that was filed on November 25, 2013. Concurrently with this letter, the Company is submitting Amendment No. 3 to the Form F-1 Registration Statement (the “Amendment”).

The paragraphs below are numbered to correspond to the Staff’s comments as set forth in the Staff’s letter dated December 6, 2013. In each instance, we have repeated the Staff’s comment in italics and set forth our response in plain type below the relevant comment.

Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Statements, page 30

1.

Refer to our prior comment 2. In light of your response to our prior comment, which indicated that the $13 million in offering proceeds will be derived from a firm commitment offering, please tell us why your pro forma income statements do not include an adjustment which gives effect to the impact of the shares to be issued on your pro forma earnings per share. Revise your pro forma income statements to include the referenced adjustment or tell us why you believe no revisions are necessary.

Response

We have revised the pro forma income statements to include additional disclosure regarding the referenced adjustment.

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules, page 11-3 Exhibit 5.1

2.

We note the opinion filed as exhibit 5.1 in response to comment 3 in our letter dated July 23, 2013 relates to up to 3,450,000 ordinary shares "at an aggregate offering price not to exceed $15,500,000." However, based on the fee table and the disclosure on your prospectus cover page, the maximum aggregate offering price may exceed that dollar amount. Please submit a revised opinion that relates to all of the securities included in the registration statement.

Response

We have submitted a revised opinion that relates to all of the securities included in the registration statement.

Exhibit 23.2

3.

We note your response to prior comment 10 and that in this consent your independent auditor, Fahn Kanne & Co, refers to its audit report dated May 9, 2012 (except Note 17, as to which the date is November 21, 2013). However, we also note from page F-2 that your independent auditors' report is dated May 9, 2012 (except Note 17, as to which date is November 22, 2013). Please obtain and include a currently dated and signed consent from Fahn Kanne & Co. in your next amendment. Audit report dates referenced in the revised and updated consent should agree with the dates from the Fahn Kanne & Co. audit report included in the filing.

Response

We have submitted a revised consent. The audit report dates referenced in the revised and updated consent agree with the dates from the Fahn Kanne & Co. audit report included in Amendment No. 3.

If you have any questions as to the contents of this letter, please contact our counsel, Steven J. Glusband at (212) 238-8605.

Thank you for your assistance.

Very truly yours,
/s/ Arie Trabelsi

Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm

    zk1314044.htm

December 9, 2013

Ms. Amanda Ravitz

Assistant Director

United States

Securities and Exchange Commission

Washington, D.C. 20549

Re:

SuperCom Ltd.

Amendment No. 2 to Registration Statement

on Form F-1, Filed November 25, 2013

File No. 333-189810

Dear Ms. Ravitz:

Set forth below are the responses of SuperCom Ltd. (the “Company”) to the comments of the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Staff”) regarding Amendment No. 2 to its Registration Statement on Form F-1 that was filed on November 25, 2013.  Concurrently with this letter, the Company is submitting Amendment No. 3 to the Form F-1 Registration Statement (the “Amendment”).

The paragraphs below are numbered to correspond to the Staff’s comments as set forth in the Staff’s letter dated December 6, 2013.  In each instance, we have repeated the Staff’s comment in italics and set forth our response in plain type below the relevant comment.

Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Statements, page 30

1.

Refer to our prior comment 2.  In light of your response to our prior comment, which indicated that the $13 million in offering proceeds will be derived from a firm commitment offering, please tell us why your pro forma income statements do not include an adjustment which gives effect to the impact of the shares to be issued on your pro forma earnings per share.  Revise your pro forma income statements to include the referenced adjustment or tell us why you believe no revisions are necessary.

Response

We have revised the pro forma income statements to include additional disclosure regarding the referenced adjustment.

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules, page 11-3 Exhibit 5.1

2.

We note the opinion filed as exhibit 5.1 in response to comment 3 in our letter dated July 23, 2013 relates to up to 3,450,000 ordinary shares "at an aggregate offering price not to exceed $15,500,000."  However, based on the fee table and the disclosure on your prospectus cover page, the maximum aggregate offering price may exceed that dollar amount.  Please submit a revised opinion that relates to all of the securities included in the registration statement.

Response

We have submitted a revised opinion that relates to all of the securities included in the registration statement.

Exhibit 23.2

3.

We note your response to prior comment 10 and that in this consent your independent auditor, Fahn Kanne & Co, refers to its audit report dated May 9, 2012 (except Note 17, as to which the date is November 21, 2013).  However, we also note from page F-2 that your independent auditors' report is dated May 9, 2012 (except Note 17, as to which date is November 22, 2013).  Please obtain and include a currently dated and signed consent from Fahn Kanne & Co. in your next amendment.  Audit report dates referenced in the revised and updated consent should agree with the dates from the Fahn Kanne & Co. audit report included in the filing.

Response

We have submitted a revised consent.  The audit report dates referenced in the revised and updated consent agree with the dates from the Fahn Kanne & Co. audit report included in Amendment No. 3.

If you have any questions as to the contents of this letter, please contact our counsel, Steven J. Glusband at (212) 238-8605.

Thank you for your assistance.

 Very truly yours,

/s/ Arie Trabelsi

Arie Trabelsi

Chief Executive Officer

AT:gb