SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Probe Scores Topics IPO Watchlist Monthly Activity About API

SEC Company Response from Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. (SHO, SHO-PH, SHO-PI) (CIK 0001295810) (SHO) — Feb 12, 2007

Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. (SHO, SHO-PH, SHO-PI) (CIK 0001295810)
Date: Feb. 12, 2007 · CIK: 0001295810 · Accession: 0001193125-07-027752

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

Sentiment
Urgency
Document Type
Confidence
SEC Posture
Company Posture

Summary

Reasoning

File numbers found in text: 001-32319

Date
February 12, 2007
Author
/s/ Ken Cruse
Form
CORRESP
Company
Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. (SHO, SHO-PH, SHO-PI) (CIK 0001295810)

Letter

VIA EDGAR Re: Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. Form 10-K for Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2005 Forms 10-Q for Fiscal Quarters Ended March 31, 2006 and June 30, 2006 Commission File No. 001-32319

Dear Ms. VanDoorn:

This letter constitutes the response of Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the “Company”), to the comment letter of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) dated January 16, 2007. In our letter, we refer to the Staff of the Commission as the “Staff” and to the Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2006 as the “Second Quarter 2006 Form 10-Q”. Comment numbering used for the response set forth below corresponds to the comment numbering used in the Staff’s letter.

Second Quarter 2006 Form 10-Q

Note 13—Subsequent Events, page 12

Comment 1: Please tell us how you concluded the forward sale agreement you entered into with Citigroup Global Markets in July 2006 was not required to be accounted for as a derivative under SFAS 133. Specifically, tell us how you concluded that the paragraph 11(a) scope exception in SFAS 133 is available given that the forward sale agreement does not appear to be solely indexed to your own common stock, as defined in EITF 01-6, given that:

•

the forward price is also based on the Federal Funds Rate; and

•

the forward price is subject to decrease if the cost to the forward counterparty of borrowing your common stock exceeds a specified amount.

903 Calle Amanecer, Suite 100 San Clemente, CA 92673

Response: We have concluded that we qualify for the paragraph 11(a) scope exception in SFAS 133 because these types of instruments are set at contracted prices that include a cost to carry that is consistent with industry practice in establishing a forward price. Essentially this is a pricing mechanism, not a derivative that can be used to hedge market conditions. By including changes to the forward sale price based on the Federal Funds Rate, the forward sale contract is more closely aligned with changes in value to the Company’s common stock as opposed to fluctuating due solely to the passage of time or changes in interest rates. Accordingly, by including an interest rate factor, changes to the forward sale price are more directly indexed to the Company’s own equity because the forward counterparty’s cost to borrow is based solely on the Company’s common stock price.

We have concluded that this forward sale agreement is indexed to our own common stock by following the rules of EITF 01-6. As a result of the fact that the forward sale contract is indexed to the Company’s stock, we followed the provisions of EITF 00-19. Accordingly this instrument is properly accounted for as an equity instrument and not a derivative liability.

If you have any questions concerning the foregoing, please contact the undersigned at (949) 369-4212. We would appreciate it if you could direct your response, if any, to this submission to Ken Cruse at the Company as you did with the comment letter responded to in this letter. Mr. Cruse’s fax number is (949) 369-3151.

Very truly yours,
/s/ Ken Cruse

Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm

Correspondence Letter

 February 12, 2007

 VIA EDGAR

 Linda VanDoorn

 Senior
Assistant Chief Accountant

 U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

 Mail Stop 4561

 450 Fifth Street, N.W.

 Washington,
D.C. 20549

Re:
Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc.

 Form 10-K for Fiscal Year
Ended December 31, 2005

 Forms 10-Q for Fiscal Quarters Ended March 31, 2006 and June 30, 2006

 Commission File No. 001-32319

 Dear
Ms. VanDoorn:

 This letter constitutes the response of Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the
“Company”), to the comment letter of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) dated January 16, 2007. In our letter, we refer to the Staff of the Commission as the “Staff” and to the Form 10-Q for
the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2006 as the “Second Quarter 2006 Form 10-Q”. Comment numbering used for the response set forth below corresponds to the comment numbering used in the Staff’s letter.

 Second Quarter 2006 Form 10-Q

 Note 13—Subsequent Events, page 12

 Comment 1: Please tell us how you concluded the forward sale agreement you
entered into with Citigroup Global Markets in July 2006 was not required to be accounted for as a derivative under SFAS 133. Specifically, tell us how you concluded that the paragraph 11(a) scope exception in SFAS 133 is available given that the
forward sale agreement does not appear to be solely indexed to your own common stock, as defined in EITF 01-6, given that:

•

 the forward price is also based on the Federal Funds Rate; and

•

 the forward price is subject to decrease if the cost to the forward counterparty of borrowing your common stock exceeds a specified amount.

 903 Calle Amanecer, Suite 100 San Clemente, CA 92673

 Response: We have concluded that we qualify for the paragraph 11(a) scope exception in SFAS 133
because these types of instruments are set at contracted prices that include a cost to carry that is consistent with industry practice in establishing a forward price. Essentially this is a pricing mechanism, not a derivative that can be used to
hedge market conditions. By including changes to the forward sale price based on the Federal Funds Rate, the forward sale contract is more closely aligned with changes in value to the Company’s common stock as opposed to fluctuating due solely
to the passage of time or changes in interest rates. Accordingly, by including an interest rate factor, changes to the forward sale price are more directly indexed to the Company’s own equity because the forward counterparty’s cost to
borrow is based solely on the Company’s common stock price.

 We have concluded that this forward sale agreement is indexed to our own
common stock by following the rules of EITF 01-6. As a result of the fact that the forward sale contract is indexed to the Company’s stock, we followed the provisions of EITF 00-19. Accordingly this instrument is properly accounted for as an
equity instrument and not a derivative liability.

 If you have any questions concerning the foregoing, please contact the undersigned at
(949) 369-4212. We would appreciate it if you could direct your response, if any, to this submission to Ken Cruse at the Company as you did with the comment letter responded to in this letter. Mr. Cruse’s fax number is
(949) 369-3151.

Very truly yours,

 /s/ Ken Cruse

Ken Cruse

cc:
Jon Kline

 Bill Wagner

 903 Calle Amanecer, Suite 100 San Clemente, CA 92673