SEC Comment Letter for PANOSHAN (CIK 0001301369) — Jun 3, 2005
PANOSHAN (CIK 0001301369)
Date: June 3, 2005 · CIK: 0001301369 · Accession: 0000000000-05-027668
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
File numbers found in text: 333-118576
Show Raw Text
<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>LETTER
<SEQUENCE>1
<FILENAME>filename1.txt
<TEXT>
May 23, 2005
Mail Stop 4561
Jonathan Levine
President
Panoshan Marketing Corp.
Suite 400, 715 - 5th Avenue S.W.
Calgary, Alberta T2P 2X6, Canada
Re: Panoshan Marketing Corp.
Registration No. 333-118576
Dear Mr. Levine:
We have received the following additional comment from the
Division of Market Regulation regarding whether Puroil is acting
as
an unregistered broker/dealer pursuant to Section 15(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
General
1. We have reviewed your response to comment 1 from our January
12,
2005 comment letter regarding whether Puroil`s activities would
require that it register as a broker/dealer under Section 15(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. We note that in
Panoshan`s Amendment No. 4 to the Registration Statement on Form
F-1,
on page 19 under the section heading "Material Relationship," you
indicate that Puroil receives $1,000 per month and a sales
commission
of 20% in exchange for management services provided to Panoshan.
We
also note that under the same section heading you indicate that
Puroil shall postpone payment of such fees until the registration
statement becomes effective and that there is no accrual or back
pay
allowance.
Please expand your response to our prior comment 1 to
elaborate
on whether Puroil is receiving compensation related to
transactions in securities which may render it to be "engaged in
the business" of effecting securities transactions. Specifically,
please comment on the following:
* Please explain the nature of the services for which Panoshan
shall
provide Puriol a consulting fee consisting of a 20% sales
commission
and $1,000 per month and whether the services relate to the sale
of
securities of Panoshan or any other entity.
* Please state whether Panoshan shall owe any fees to Puroil if
the
registration statement is not declared effective, and if not,
please
explain why such fees should not be viewed as relating to
effecting
securities transactions. Please describe all contingencies
involved
in the payment of fees to Puroil by Panoshan, including a
statement
whether the completion of the distribution-by-dividend process to
Puroil`s shareholders is required prior to the payment of fees.
Please be as detailed as necessary in your explanations.
After
reviewing your response, we may or may not have additional
comments.
* * * *
You may contact Eric McPhee at (202) 551-3693 or Donna
DiSilvio,
Branch Chief, at (202) 551-3202 if you have questions regarding
comments on the financial statements and related matters. Please
contact Owen Pinkerton, Attorney-Advisor, at (202) 551-3694 or me
at
(202) 551-3780 with any other questions.
Sincerely,
Elaine Wolff
Branch Chief
cc: W. Scott Lawler, Esq. (via facsimile)
Lawler & Associates
??
??
??
??
Panoshan Marketing Corp.
Page 2
</TEXT>
</DOCUMENT>