SecProbe.io

CORRESP
1
filename1.htm

Correspondence

 September 28, 2011

Via EDGAR

 Securities and
Exchange Commission

 Division of Corporation Finance

 Attention: Rufus Decker, Accounting Branch Chief

 100 F Street, N.E.

Washington, D.C. 20549

Re:
Green Plains Renewable Energy, Inc.

 Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year ended December 31, 2010

 Filed
March 4, 2011

 Form 10-Q for the Fiscal Quarter ended June 30, 2011

Filed August 5, 2011

 File No. 1-32924

 Ladies and Gentlemen:

On March 4, 2011, Green Plains Renewable Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) filed its annual report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2010 (the “10-K Filing”) with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) pursuant to the Securities Act of 1934. On August 5, 2011, the Company filed its quarterly report on Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011 (the “10-Q Filing”) with the Commission. The Company received comments on the 10-K Filing and the 10-Q Filing from the Division of Corporation Finance (the “Staff”) of the
Commission by letter dated September 15, 2011 (the “Letter”).

 We understand that the purpose of the
Staff’s review process is to assist us in our compliance with applicable disclosure requirements and to enhance the overall disclosure in our filings. This letter is provided by the Company in response to the comments in the Letter. For your
convenience, the comments in the Letter are provided below, followed by the Company’s responses. Within certain responses, we have underlined additional or changed wording to highlight our proposed revisions that will be incorporated into our
future filings, which we believe will streamline your review of the corresponding Company response.

 FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 2010

General

Staff Comment:

 1. Where a comment below requests additional disclosures or other revisions to be made,
please show us in your supplemental response what the revisions will look like. These revisions should be included in your future filings.

 Company Response:

 Please see responses below to each of your comments. Where applicable, revisions will be
included in future filings.

 Item 7 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis…, page 39

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Goodwill, page 42

Staff Comment:

 2. To the extent that any of your reporting units have estimated fair values that are not
substantially in excess of the carrying value and to the extent that goodwill for these reporting units, in the aggregate or individually, if impaired, could materially impact your operating results, please provide the following disclosures for each
of these reporting units in future filings:

 •       Identify the reporting unit;

•       The percentage by which fair value exceeds the carrying value as
of the most-recent step-one test;

•       The amount of goodwill;

•       A description of the assumptions that drive the estimated fair
value;

•       A discussion of the uncertainty associated with the key
assumptions. For example, to the extent that you have included assumptions in your discounted cash flow model that materially deviates from your historical results, please include a discussion of these assumptions; and

•       A discussion of any potential events and/or circumstances that
could have a negative effect to the estimated fair value.

 If you have
determined that the estimated fair value substantially exceeds the carrying value for all of your reporting units, please disclose this determination. Please also provide the above disclosures, as applicable, for any long-lived assets or asset
groups for which you have determined that fair value is not substantially in excess of the carrying value and to the extent that the asset amounts in the aggregate or individually, could materially impact your operating results. Please refer to
Item 303 of Regulation S-K and Sections 216 and 501.14 of the SEC’s Codification of Financial Reporting Policies for guidance.

Company Response:

 In Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Goodwill discussions)
on pages F-12 and F-13, we discuss our policies related to reviews for impairment of long-lived assets and goodwill, noting that no impairment charges were recorded during the periods presented. However, as noted in your comment, we did not make
this similar assertion in Item 7 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

We will expand our Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates discussion to disclose the results of our most recent evaluation of the fair value and
carrying value of our reporting units. If we have determined that the estimated fair value substantially exceeds the carrying value for all of our reporting units, we will disclose this determination. Additionally, during the periods presented, we
did not encounter any events or changes in circumstances that would indicate that the carrying amount of any long lived asset may not be recoverable. The expanded disclosure which will appear in our Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2011,
assuming no impairment has occurred, is shown below:

 Impairment of
Long-Lived Assets and Goodwill

 Our long-lived
assets consist of property and equipment. We review long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of a long-lived asset may not be recoverable. We measure recoverability of assets to
be held and used by comparing the carrying amount of an asset to the estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, we record an impairment
charge in the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. No impairment charges have been recorded during the periods presented.

 Our goodwill consists of amounts relating to our acquisitions
of Green Plains Central City, Green Plains Holdings II (formerly Global Ethanol), Green Plains Ord and Green Plains Otter Tail, as well as our wholly owned subsidiary Blendstar. We review goodwill at an individual plant or subsidiary level for
impairment at least annually, as of October 1, or more frequently whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that impairment may have occurred. We perform a two-step impairment test to evaluate goodwill. Under the first step, we compare
the estimated fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying value (including goodwill). If the estimated fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying

 2

 value, we complete a second step to determine the amount of the goodwill impairment that we should record. In the second step, we
determine an implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill by allocating the reporting unit’s fair value to all of its assets and liabilities other than goodwill. We compare the resulting implied fair value of the goodwill to the
carrying amount and record an impairment charge for the difference. As of our most recent annual review of goodwill, we have determined that the estimated fair value of each reporting unit substantially exceeds each of their respective carrying
values.

 The reviews of long-lived assets
and goodwill require making estimates regarding amount and timing of projected cash flows to be generated by an asset or asset group over an extended period of time. Management judgment regarding the existence of circumstances that indicate
impairment is based on numerous potential factors including, but not limited to, declines in operating cash flows, a decision to suspend operations at a plant for an extended period of time, or industry trends. Significant management judgment is
required in determining the fair value of our long-lived assets and goodwill to measure impairment, including projections of future cash flows. Fair value is determined through various valuation techniques including discounted cash flow models,
quoted market values and third-party independent appraisals, as considered necessary. Changes in estimates of fair value could result in a write-down of the asset in a future period.

 In the event we determine that any of our reporting units has an estimated fair value that is not substantially in excess of the
carrying value and to the extent that goodwill for this reporting unit, in the aggregate or individually, if impaired, could materially impact our operating results, we will further expand our disclosures to include:

•       identification of the reporting unit;

•       disclosure of the percentage by which fair value exceeds the
carrying value as of the most-recent-step-one test;

 •       the amount of goodwill impaired;

•       a description of the assumptions that drive the estimated fair
value;

•       discussion of the uncertainty associated with the key
assumptions; and

•       discussion of any potential events and/or circumstances that
could have a negative effect to the estimated fair value.

Item 15 – Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, page 63

 Note 7 – Segment Information, page F-17

Staff Comment:

 3. Please revise the table on page F-18 to present for each segment revenues from external
customers as well as intersegment revenues as required by ASC 280-10-50-22(a) and (b). Refer to the example set forth in ASC 280-10-55-48.

Company Response:

We will present, for each segment, revenues from external customers as well as intersegment revenues as required by ASC 280-10-50-22(a) and (b). Please see the table below for
the format of our footnote disclosure of segment information, based on our current reportable segment definition, to be included in our Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2011:

 3

Year Ended December 31,

2011

2010

2009

 Revenue:

 Ethanol production

 Revenue from external customers

$
xxx

$
62,581

$
61,745

 Intersegment revenue

xxx

1,052,590

669,508

 Total segment revenue

xxx

1,115,171

731,253

 Corn oil production

 Revenue from external customers

xxx

1,702

—

 Intersegment revenue

xxx

708

—

 Total segment revenue

xxx

2,410

—

 Agribusiness

 Revenue from external customers

xxx

248,119

146,539

 Intersegment revenue

xxx

122,165

74,076

 Total segment revenue

xxx

370,284

220,615

 Marketing and distribution

 Revenue from external customers

xxx

1,820,566

1,095,890

 Intersegment revenue

xxx

293

201

 Total segment revenue

xxx

1,820,859

1,096,091

 Revenue including intersegment activity

xxx

3,308,724

2,047,959

 Intersegment elimination

(xxx
)

(1,175,756
)

(743,785
)

 Revenue as reported

$
xxx

$
2,132,968

$
 1,304,174

We will incorporate similar expanded disclosure in our interim filings, beginning with our Form 10-Q filing for the quarterly period ending September 30, 2011.

Note 11 – Long-Term Debt, page F-23

Staff Comment:

 4. You disclose here and on pages 18 and 19 that you obtained waivers related to your
non-compliance with various debt covenants. Please disclose when each waiver was obtained and the facts and circumstances that required it. Please also disclose the specific debt covenants that you were not in compliance with including the actual
ratios/amounts as compared to the required ratios/amounts, along with any revisions to the required ratios/amounts that occurred for current or future periods as a result of discussions with the lenders. Please also disclose the duration of each
waiver. Please disclose whether each of your various debt arrangements have cross default provisions. Please disclose whether you believe that you will be able to comply with each covenant that was violated for the next twelve months without the
need to obtain additional waivers. Please also explain how additional future violations of these debt covenants would impact your liquidity.

Company Response:

 We have completed amendments of most of our loan agreements and are in the process of finalizing similar modifications to other loan
agreements. The loan amendments generally provide us with the opportunity to meet financial covenants within defined time periods following each measurement date without triggering lenders’ rights to accelerate repayment. When finalized,
expected during 2011, we expect to consistently maintain compliance with each of our various debt agreements in future periods. However, if a waiver is required in the future related to any material debt covenants, we will expand our disclosures in
our Long-Term Debt footnote to include:

 •       when each waiver was obtained and the facts and circumstances that required it;

•       the specific debt covenants that we were not in compliance with,
including the actual ratios/amounts as compared to the required ratios/amounts, along with any revisions to the required ratios/amounts that occurred for current or future periods as a result of discussions with the lenders;

•       the duration of each waiver;

 4

 •       whether the impacted debt arrangements have
cross default provisions;

•       whether we believe that we will be able to comply with each
covenant that was violated for the next twelve months without the need to obtain additional waivers; and

•       the expected impact of additional future violations of these debt
covenants on our liquidity.

 To the extent such information is material,
we will include related discussion in the Liquidity and Capital Resources section within Management Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, as appropriate.

Staff Comment:

 5. For any material debt covenants that required a waiver or for which it is reasonably likely that either (a) you will not be able
to meet or (b) could limit your ability to undertake additional debt or equity financing, please also disclose the specific computations used to arrive at the actual ratios/amounts with corresponding reconciliations to U.S. GAAP amounts. See Section
I.D. and IV.C of the SEC Interpretive Release No. 33-8350 and Compliance and Disclosures Interpretation 102.09 which is available on our website at http://www.sec.gov/divisions/corpfin/guidance/nongaapinterp.htm.

Company Response:

In future Form 10-K and 10-Q filings, for any material debt covenants that require a waiver or for which it is reasonably likely that either
(a) we will not be able to meet or (b) could limit our ability to undertake additional debt or equity financing, we will expand our disclosures to include specific computations used to arrive at the actual ratios/amounts with corresponding
reconciliations to U.S. GAAP amounts.

Note 15 – Commitments and Contingencies, page F-36

 Operating Leases, page F-36

Staff Comment:

 6. Please disclose how you account for (a) step rent provisions and escalation clauses and (b) capital improvements funding and other
lease concessions, which may be present in your leases. Lease payments that depend on an existing index or rate, such as the consumer price index or the prime interest rate, should also be included in your minimum lease payments. If, as we assume,
they are taken into account in computing your minimum lease payments and the minimum lease payments are recognized on a straight-line basis over the minimum lease term, the note should so state. If our assumption is incorrect, please tell us how
your accounting complies with ASC 840.

 Company

Response:

 Step rent provisions and escalation clauses, capital improvements funding and other lease
concessions in our operating leases are taken into account in our computations of minimum lease payments that are recognized on a straight-line basis over the minimum lease term. An immaterial portion of our current lease commitments include step
rent provisions, but do not include escalation clauses or lease concessions. If such lease provisions become material in the future, we will expand our Operating Leases discussion to specifically state that they are taken into acc