SEC Company Response from Waste Connections, Inc. (WCN) (CIK 0001318220) (WCN) — Apr 21, 2016
Waste Connections, Inc. (WCN) (CIK 0001318220)
Date: April 21, 2016 · CIK: 0001318220 · Accession: 0001104659-16-113006
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
Reasoning
File numbers found in text: 333-209896
Referenced dates: March 29, 2016
Letter
VIA EDGAR Office of Manufacturing and Construction Division of Corporation Finance United States Securities and Exchange Commission 100 F Street, NE Washington, D.C. 20549-7010 Re: Progressive Waste Solutions Ltd. Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on Form F-4 Filed April 1, 2016 File No. 333-209896
Dear Mr. Ingram:
On behalf of our client, Progressive Waste Solutions Ltd. (the “Company”), please find below a response to the comments of the staff (the “Staff”) of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) communicated to us on April 19, 2016 with regard to Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form F-4 filed on April 1, 2016 (the “Registration Statement”).
The Company is filing concurrently with this letter an amendment to the Registration Statement (“Amendment No. 2”), which includes revisions to the Registration Statement in response to the Staff’s comments below. In addition to the EDGAR filing, we are delivering a hard copy of this letter, along with five copies of Amendment No. 2 marked to indicate changes from the Registration Statement filed on April 1, 2016.
Set forth below in bold are comments from the Staff’s letter. Immediately below each of the Staff’s comments is the Company’s response to that comment. For your convenience, each of the numbered paragraphs below corresponds to the numbered comment in the Staff’s comment letter and includes the caption used in the comment letter.
Mr. Jay Ingram
Legal Branch Chief
April 20, 2016
Page 2
General
1. We are continuing to evaluate your response to comment two in our letter dated March 29, 2016.
Response: Upon guidance received from the Staff during a telephonic conversation held on April 20, 2016, the disclosure has been revised on page 107 of Amendment No. 2, the consent of Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP has been provided as Exhibit 23.4 and the consent of Locke Lord LLP has been provided as Exhibit 23.5.
2. We note that one of the conditions to the merger is that there is no change to the Internal Revenue Code that will have “a material limitation on the ability to deduct for U.S. federal income tax purposes interest on any current or reasonably anticipated debt obligation… of Waste Connections… or any of its subsidiaries.” Further, we note that on April 5, 2016, Waste Connections filed a Form 425 and Progressive Waste filed a Form 6-K to indicate that based on an initial review of the U.S. Department of Treasury’s proposed tax regulations issued on April 4, 2016 that the “the companies believe that the proposed regulations could have an impact of less than 3% of the combined company expected Year 1 adjusted free cash flow.” In your amended registration statement, please discuss the potential impact of these proposed regulations on the merger, and also disclose why the companies believe that these proposed regulations will only impact first year free cash flows by 3%.
Response: In response to the Staff’s comment, the disclosure has been revised on page 33 of Amendment No. 2.
Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Financial Information, page 123
3. In discussing the $8,084 tax benefit on $1,987 pro forma income before taxes, you state it does not reflect potential post-acquisition tax strategies expected to result in tax savings to the combined company. The predominance of the disclosure regarding potential additional tax savings could suggest you expect tax benefits at a rate even beyond the tax benefit of 407% of pro forma income. Please provide a more general discussion of the inverse relationship of pro forma income tax benefit of 407% of pro forma income and the limitations of this pro forma information. Clarify, if true, that the combined pro forma tax benefit is not a useful indicator of future results and provide or refer to a discussion of your known expectations.
Response: In response to the Staff’s comment, the disclosure has been revised on page 138 of Amendment No. 2. With respect to the Staff’s comment that Progressive “refer to a discussion of [its] known expectations”, we respectfully refer the Staff to the third paragraph of the disclosure in note 7.e to the Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Financial Information, which discloses
Mr. Jay Ingram
Legal Branch Chief
April 20, 2016
Page 3
Progressive’s expectation that while post-merger activities are expected to result in tax savings to the combined company, such activities have not yet been determined and are, therefore, not factually supportable for the purpose of incorporation into the pro forma financial information.
****
If you have any questions or would like to discuss any of the responses, please do not hesitate to call me at (212) 310-8961 or send me an e-mail (matthew.gilroy@weil.com).
Sincerely,
/s/ Matthew J. Gilroy
Show Raw Text
CORRESP 1 filename1.htm CONFIDENTIAL VIA EDGAR 767 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10153-0119 +1 212 310 8000 tel +1 212 310 8007 fax April 20, 2016 Via Hand Delivery Jay Ingram Legal Branch Chief Office of Manufacturing and Construction Division of Corporation Finance United States Securities and Exchange Commission 100 F Street, NE Washington, D.C. 20549-7010 Re: Progressive Waste Solutions Ltd. Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on Form F-4 Filed April 1, 2016 File No. 333-209896 Dear Mr. Ingram: On behalf of our client, Progressive Waste Solutions Ltd. (the “Company”), please find below a response to the comments of the staff (the “Staff”) of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) communicated to us on April 19, 2016 with regard to Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form F-4 filed on April 1, 2016 (the “Registration Statement”). The Company is filing concurrently with this letter an amendment to the Registration Statement (“Amendment No. 2”), which includes revisions to the Registration Statement in response to the Staff’s comments below. In addition to the EDGAR filing, we are delivering a hard copy of this letter, along with five copies of Amendment No. 2 marked to indicate changes from the Registration Statement filed on April 1, 2016. Set forth below in bold are comments from the Staff’s letter. Immediately below each of the Staff’s comments is the Company’s response to that comment. For your convenience, each of the numbered paragraphs below corresponds to the numbered comment in the Staff’s comment letter and includes the caption used in the comment letter. Mr. Jay Ingram Legal Branch Chief April 20, 2016 Page 2 General 1. We are continuing to evaluate your response to comment two in our letter dated March 29, 2016. Response: Upon guidance received from the Staff during a telephonic conversation held on April 20, 2016, the disclosure has been revised on page 107 of Amendment No. 2, the consent of Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP has been provided as Exhibit 23.4 and the consent of Locke Lord LLP has been provided as Exhibit 23.5. 2. We note that one of the conditions to the merger is that there is no change to the Internal Revenue Code that will have “a material limitation on the ability to deduct for U.S. federal income tax purposes interest on any current or reasonably anticipated debt obligation… of Waste Connections… or any of its subsidiaries.” Further, we note that on April 5, 2016, Waste Connections filed a Form 425 and Progressive Waste filed a Form 6-K to indicate that based on an initial review of the U.S. Department of Treasury’s proposed tax regulations issued on April 4, 2016 that the “the companies believe that the proposed regulations could have an impact of less than 3% of the combined company expected Year 1 adjusted free cash flow.” In your amended registration statement, please discuss the potential impact of these proposed regulations on the merger, and also disclose why the companies believe that these proposed regulations will only impact first year free cash flows by 3%. Response: In response to the Staff’s comment, the disclosure has been revised on page 33 of Amendment No. 2. Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Financial Information, page 123 3. In discussing the $8,084 tax benefit on $1,987 pro forma income before taxes, you state it does not reflect potential post-acquisition tax strategies expected to result in tax savings to the combined company. The predominance of the disclosure regarding potential additional tax savings could suggest you expect tax benefits at a rate even beyond the tax benefit of 407% of pro forma income. Please provide a more general discussion of the inverse relationship of pro forma income tax benefit of 407% of pro forma income and the limitations of this pro forma information. Clarify, if true, that the combined pro forma tax benefit is not a useful indicator of future results and provide or refer to a discussion of your known expectations. Response: In response to the Staff’s comment, the disclosure has been revised on page 138 of Amendment No. 2. With respect to the Staff’s comment that Progressive “refer to a discussion of [its] known expectations”, we respectfully refer the Staff to the third paragraph of the disclosure in note 7.e to the Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Financial Information, which discloses Mr. Jay Ingram Legal Branch Chief April 20, 2016 Page 3 Progressive’s expectation that while post-merger activities are expected to result in tax savings to the combined company, such activities have not yet been determined and are, therefore, not factually supportable for the purpose of incorporation into the pro forma financial information. **** If you have any questions or would like to discuss any of the responses, please do not hesitate to call me at (212) 310-8961 or send me an e-mail (matthew.gilroy@weil.com). Sincerely, /s/ Matthew J. Gilroy Matthew J. Gilroy cc: Loreto Grimaldi Executive Vice President and Chief Legal Officer Progressive Waste Solutions Ltd.