SEC Company Response from Ares Real Estate Income Trust Inc. (ZARE) (CIK 0001327978) (ZARE) — Apr 6, 2020
Ares Real Estate Income Trust Inc. (ZARE) (CIK 0001327978)
Date: April 6, 2020 · CIK: 0001327978 · Accession: 0001104659-20-043762
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
File numbers found in text: 333-222630
Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm
DLA Piper LLP (US)
4141 Parklake Avenue, Suite 300
Raleigh, North Carolina 27612-2350
www.dlapiper.com
Christopher R. Stambaugh
christopher.stambaugh@dlapiper.com
T 919.786.2040
F 919.786.2200
Via EDGAR
April 6, 2020
Jonathan Burr
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street N.E.
Mail Stop 3010CF/AD8
Washington, DC 20549
Re: Black Creek Diversified Property Fund Inc.
Post-Effective Amendment No. 21 to Registration
Statement on Form S-11
Filed March 19, 2020
File No. 333-222630
Dear Mr. Burr:
On behalf of our client, Black Creek Diversified Property Fund
Inc. (the “Company”), a Maryland corporation, and pursuant to applicable provisions of the Securities Act of 1933,
as amended, and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder (the “Securities Act”), please find attached for filing
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) via EDGAR, a complete copy of Pre-Effective Amendment
No. 1 to the above-referenced Post-Effective Amendment No. 21 to Registration Statement on Form S-11 (“Pre-Effective
Amendment No. 1”).
Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 includes revisions in response
to the comment letter from the staff of the Commission’s Division of Corporation Finance (the “Staff”) to Jeffrey
Taylor, Managing Director, Co-President of the Company, dated March 30, 2020, which are reproduced below.
Post-Effective Amendment No. 21 to Registration Statement
on Form S-11 filed March 19, 2020.
Forum for Certain Litigation, page 213.
1. We note that your forum selection provision identifies the
Circuit Court for Baltimore City, Maryland as the exclusive forum for certain litigation, including any “derivative action.”
Please disclose whether this provision applies to actions arising under the Securities Act or Exchange Act. In that regard, we
note that Section 27 of the Exchange Act creates exclusive federal jurisdiction over all suits brought to enforce any duty or liability
created by the Exchange Act or the rules and regulations thereunder, and Section 22 of the Securities Act creates concurrent jurisdiction
for federal and state courts over all suits brought to enforce any duty or liability created by the Securities Act or the rules
and regulations thereunder. If the provision applies to Securities Act claims, please also revise your prospectus to state that
there is uncertainty as to whether a court would enforce such provision and that investors cannot waive compliance with the federal
securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder.
Response: The Company has amended its bylaws and
disclosures in its prospectus to clarify that the exclusive forum provisions do not apply to claims under the Securities Act of
1933, as amended, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or any other claim for which the federal courts have exclusive
jurisdiction.
****
Jonathan Burr
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
April 6, 2020
Page 2
I would be happy to provide any additional
information that might assist you in connection with this matter. Please feel free to contact me by email at christopher.stambaugh@dlapiper.com
or by phone at (919) 786-2040 with any questions or additional comments.
Very
truly yours,
DLA
PIPER LLP (US)
/s/
Christopher R. Stambaugh
Christopher
R. Stambaugh