SEC Company Response from Brookdale Senior Living Inc. (BKD) (CIK 0001332349) (BKD) — Oct 25, 2005
Brookdale Senior Living Inc. (BKD) (CIK 0001332349)
Date: Oct. 25, 2005 · CIK: 0001332349 · Accession: 0000950123-05-012559
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
File numbers found in text: 333-127372
Show Raw Text
<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>CORRESP
<SEQUENCE>1
<FILENAME>filename1.txt
<TEXT>
<PAGE>
October 20, 2005
BY HAND
Ms. Sandra Stokes
Mr. Terry French
Mr. Alonso Rodriguez
Albert Pappas, Esq.
Securities and Exchange Commission
Division of Corporation Finance
Mail Stop 3561
100 F Street, N.E.
Washington, D.C. 20549
RE: Brookdale Senior Living Inc.
Amendment No. 2 to Registration Statement on Form S-1
(File No. 333-127372)
Ladies and Gentlemen:
On behalf of Brookdale Senior Living Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), set forth below in this letter are the Company's revised responses
as requested on a conference call on October 19, 2005 with Ms. Sandra Stokes,
Mr. Terry French and Mr. Alonso Rodriguez, and representatives of the Company,
Ernst & Young LLP and Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP. Reference is
hereby made to the above-referenced Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed
with the Commission on September 21, 2005. Capitalized terms used and not
defined have the meanings given in the Registration Statement.
SEGMENT REPORTING
In response to our conversation, the Company has reviewed the discrete financial
information for each of the 380 facilities that is provided to chief operating
decision makers under the provisions of FAS 131, paragraph 17, for aggregating
reporting segments. The Company has concluded that its economic characteristics,
based on the nature of its products and services, the nature of its production
process, the type and class of customer for its products and services, and the
methods used to distribute its products and services, are similar. However, each
facility's net operating income and related margin vary significantly across the
portfolio. Based upon this analysis, the Company has concluded that it cannot
apply the provisions of FAS 131, paragraph 17, or meet the quantitative
thresholds of FAS 131, paragraphs 18 and 19, to get to ten operating segments or
less as outlined in FAS 131, paragraph 24. Accordingly, the Company has reviewed
its reporting segments and determined that the most meaningful segment
information for the readers of its financial statements
<PAGE>
would be a segregation of the facilities along the product lines discussed in
the filing. The Company has defined the most meaningful product lines to be (i)
retirement centers, including independent living facilities and CCRCs that
provide a wide range of services to its residents, (ii) free standing assisted
living facilities that do not provide as wide a range of services and (iii)
third party management services.
The Company will provide segment information in its next filing.
SAMPLE SEGMENT DISCLOSURE:
We have significant operations principally in three business segments:
retirement centers, free standing assisted living, and management services. Our
retirement centers are composed of 73 facilities of which 66 include a
combination of independent living and assisted living units and 7 CCRCs, which
provide a full continuum of care (independent living, assisted living and
skilled nursing). We currently operate 290 free standing assisted living
facilities that are generally comprised of smaller facilities not located in a
retirement center setting which may also provide specialized care such as
Alzheimer's and memory care services. We currently provide management service to
17 facilities which are owned by unaffiliated third parties.
The accounting policies of our segments are the same as those described in the
summary of significant accounting policies. The following table sets forth
certain segment financial and operating data.
<Table>
<Caption>
THREE MONTHS ENDED SIX MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, JUNE 30, YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
-------- -------- -----------------------
2005 2004 2005 2004 2004 2003 2002
---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Revenue:
Retirement Centers $ 92,550 $ 70,887 $ 167,452 $ 132,266 $ 279,233 $ 185,684 $ 156,894
Free Standing Assisted Living 99,800 91,751 199,010 184,955 378,094 31,532 --
Management Services 945 582 1,816 1,632 3,545 5,368 4,622
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
$ 193,295 $ 163,220 $ 368,278 $ 318,853 $ 660,872 $ 222,584 $ 161,516
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Segment Net Operating Income (1):
Retirement Centers 35,104 28,373 65,547 51,722 111,332 74,486 63,914
Free Standing Assisted Living 34,763 32,365 68,106 63,789 130,826 9,611 --
Management Services 945 582 1,816 1,632 3,545 5,368 4,622
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
$ 70,812 $ 61,320 $ 135,469 $ 117,143 $ 245,703 $ 89,465 $ 68,536
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
General and administrative 10,980 10,137 22,523 20,485 43,640 15,997 12,540
Facility lease expense 47,091 20,665 93,593 38,490 99,997 30,744 31,003
Depreciation and amortization 10,208 14,382 15,804 28,979 52,307 22,480 13,708
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Operating income (loss) $ 2,533 $ 16,136 $ 3,549 $ 29,189 $ 49,759 $ 20,244 $ 11,285
========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
Total Assets:
Retirement Centers $ 932,886
Free Standing Assisted Living 301,253 [pending]
Management Services
-- -- --
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
$1,234,139 $ -- $ -- $ --
========== ========== ========== ==========
</TABLE>
(1) segment net operating income defined as segment revenues less segment
operating expenses.
(2) cost of management services are included in general and administrative.
<PAGE>
COMMON CONTROL
The Company respectfully believes that both Fortress Registered Investment Trust
("Fund I") and Fortress Investment Trust II ("Fund II") are under the common
control of Fortress Investment Group LLC ("FIG") through (a) contractual control
relationships with, (b) investment advisory control over, and (c) financial
interests in, Fund I and Fund II. Prior to the combination transaction, Fund I
owned 50.51% of Fortress Brookdale Acquisition LLC, which owned 90.1% of BLC,
and Fund II owned 73.49% of FEBC-ALT Investors LLC, the indirect parent of
Alterra, 100% of Fortress CCRC and 100% of FIT REN, the entities which the
Company seeks to combine.
FIG exercises voting, financial and investment control over, and has an economic
interest in, each of Fund I and Fund II primarily through six agreements (three
for each fund): (i) the LLC Agreement of each of Fortress Investment Fund LLC
("FIF") and Fortress Investment Fund II LLC ("FIF II"); (ii) the Investment
Management Agreement between FIG and each of Fortress Fund MM LLC ("Fund MM")
and Fortress Fund MM II LLC ("Fund MM II"); and (iii) the LLC Agreement of each
of Fund MM and Fund MM II. Furthermore, it is our understanding that the SEC has
consistently taken the position that two registered investment companies (such
as Fund I and Fund II) are considered to be under common control when they have
the same manager and investment advisor. The Company therefore believes that the
Investment Advisory Agreement between FIG Advisors LLC, a wholly-owned
subsidiary of FIG, and each of Fund I and Fund II, further supports the
conclusion that Fund I and Fund II are under the common control of FIG.
(a) CONTRACTUAL CONTROL RELATIONSHIPS
Fund I and Fund II are wholly-owned subsidiaries of FIF and FIF II,
respectively. Fund MM and Fund MM II are the managing members of FIF
and FIF II, respectively. Section 6.1(a) of each of the FIF and FIF
II LLC Agreements provide that its "MANAGING MEMBER SHALL HAVE THE
FULL, EXCLUSIVE AND ABSOLUTE RIGHT, POWER AND AUTHORITY TO MANAGE
AND CONTROL [FIF AND FIF II] AND THE PROPERTY, ASSETS, AFFAIRS AND
BUSINESS THEREOF" and further that "THE MANAGEMENT, OPERATION AND
CONTROL OF [FIF AND FIF II] AND ITS BUSINESS AND THE FORMULATION OF
INVESTMENT POLICY SHALL BE VESTED EXCLUSIVELY IN THE MANAGING
MEMBER." Please see Annex A.
Section 6.1(f) provides further voting and investment control in
that "ANY AND ALL RIGHTS, INCLUDING VOTING RIGHTS, PERTAINING TO ANY
PORTFOLIO INVESTMENTS SHALL BE VESTED EXCLUSIVELY IN [FIF AND FIF
II] AND MAY BE EXERCISED ONLY BY THE MANAGING MEMBER." Please see
Annex B.
Fund MM and Fund MM II's control is irrevocably delegated to FIG
pursuant to Section 6.1(c), which provides that, together with the
Investment Management Agreement, Fund MM and Fund MM II "DELEGATE
THE
<PAGE>
MANAGEMENT AND OPERATION OF [FIF AND FIF II] TO [FIG] TO THE FULLEST
EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW." Please see Annex C.
FIG further exercises control over Fund MM and Fund MM II in its
capacity as the managing member of each of those entities. Section
5.3(a) of the Fund MM and Fund MM II LLC Agreements provide that
"THE BUSINESS AND AFFAIRS OF [FUND MM AND FUND MM II] SHALL BE
MANAGED SOLELY AND EXCLUSIVELY BY THE OFFICERS UNDER THE SUPERVISION
OF [FIG]." Please see Annex D.
Rule 13d-3. Rule 13d-3 provides that a beneficial owner includes
persons who, directly or indirectly, "has or shares: (1) voting
power which includes the power to vote, or direct the voting of,
such security; and/or (2) investment power which includes the power
to dispose, or direct the disposition of, such security." The
Company respectfully submits that FIG's control over the business,
its voting rights with respect to portfolio investment decisions,
and its exclusive right to formulate investment policy makes these
entities a control group for 13D purposes.
Rule 405. Rule 405 promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, defines "control," including "under common control with,"
as "the possession, direct or indirect, of the power to direct or
cause the direction of the management and policies of a person,
whether through the ownership of voting securities, by contract, or
otherwise. The Company respectfully submits that the preceding
analysis further supports that Fund I and Fund II are under the
common control of FIG, as defined in Rule 405.
(b) INVESTMENT ADVISORY CONTROL
The Company respectfully submits that Fund I and Fund II are further
under the common control of FIG through the Investment Advisory
Agreements between FIG Advisors LLC and each of Fund I and Fund II.
As set forth in SEC Release No. 6646, two registered investment
companies may be considered to be under common control where they
"have the same manager and investment adviser...and...have officers
and directors in common with each other and with the manager and
investment adviser."
Section 2 of each Investment Advisory Agreement sets forth that FIG
Advisors LLC shall, among other things, "ACT AS INVESTMENT ADVISOR
for and supervise and make recommendations with respect to the
investment and reinvestment of [Fund I and Fund II's] assets in
researching, making recommendations with respect to purchasing and
selling securities and other assets for [Fund I and Fund II] AND IN
VOTING, EXERCISING CONSENTS AND EXERCISING ALL OTHER RIGHTS
APPERTAINING TO SUCH SECURITIES and other assets on behalf of [Fund
I and Fund II]." See Annex E.
<PAGE>
(c) FINANCIAL INTEREST
The Company also considered FIG's financial interest in the
FIG-sponsored entities that hold the controlling financial interest
of the entities included in the combined financial statements. FIG
holds a stated financial interest of approximately 1%. However,
Section 4.2(a) of the FIF and FIF II LLC Agreements provide that,
after each member (including the managing member) receives their
return of capital and priority return (if applicable), its managing
member, Fund MM and Fund MM II, respectively, is entitled to
distributions of profit. Section 8.1 of the Fund MM LLC Agreement
further provides that FIG, in its capacity as Class B Member of Fund
MM, is entitled to 47.4% of the profit distributions made to Fund MM
and owns a 25% equity interest in the entity that is entitled to the
remainder of the profit distributions. Section 8.1 of the Fund MM II
LLC Agreement provides that FIG, in its capacity as the sole Class B
Member of Fund MM II, is entitled to 100% of the profit
distributions made to Fund MM II. Accordingly, the financial
interest of FIG in the entities that hold the controlling financial
interests of the entities is not considered insignificant.
Analysis of Accounting Literature. In analyzing the accounting
literature, the Company looked to FAS 141, Business Combinations,
and noted that the Statement does not define common control, nor did
its predecessor, APB Opinion No. 16.
The Company looked to EITF Opinion No. 02-5: Definition of "Common
Control" in Relation to FASB Statement No. 141, for further guidance
and noted that while the Task Force did not reach a consensus, the
SEC Observer stated that SEC registrants should continue to follow
paragraph 3 in determining