SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Probe Scores Topics IPO Watchlist Monthly Activity About API

SEC Comment Letter for Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. (LYV) (CIK 0001335258) (LYV) — Jun 16, 2015

Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. (LYV) (CIK 0001335258)
Date: June 16, 2015 · CIK: 0001335258 · Accession: 0000000000-15-031906

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

Date
June 16, 2015
Author
/s/ Melissa Raminpour
Form
UPLOAD
Company
Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. (LYV) (CIK 0001335258)

Letter

June 16, 2015 Kathy Willard Chief Financial Officer Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. 9348 Civic Center Drive Beverly Hills, California 90210

Re: Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 2014 Response Dated May 27 , 2015 File No. 001 -32601

Dear Ms. Willard :

We have reviewed your May 27 , 2015 response to our comment letter and have the following comments . In some of our comments, we may ask you to provide us with information so we may better understand your disclosure.

Please r espond to these comments within ten business days by providing the requested information or advise us as soon as possible when you will respond. If you do not believe our comments apply to your facts and circumstances, please tell us why in your response.

After reviewing your response to these comments, we may have additional comments. Unless we note otherwise, our references to prior comments are to comments in our May 1 2, 2015 letter .

Form 10 -K for the Year Ended December 31, 2014

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Consolidated Results of Operations, page 30

1. We note from your response to our prior comment 2 that the table illustrating the reconciling item titled “Differences between foreign and United States statutory rates” includes adjustments for goodwill impairment and Luxembourg ruling benefit, which result in an additional $25 million benefit.  Please explain to us how you calculated or determined this $25 million benefit. In this regard, please tell us the tax -effected amount associated with the non -deductible goodwill impairment of $117 million .  In light of the fact that your response ind icates that the goodwill impairment is not deductible for tax purposes (implying additional tax expense), please explain to us

Kathy Willard Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. June 16 , 2015 Page 2

why it appears from your response that this goodwill impairment plus the Luxembourg tax benefit, results in an increase to the ta x benefit.  We note from Note 9 that the reconciliation of income tax computed at the US federal statutory rates to income tax expense includes a separate line item titled “Nondeductible items”, which is disclosed as primarily relating to the 2014 goodwil l impairment that is not deductible for tax purposes. Please clarify for us whether the tax effects of this 2014 goodwill impairment is included in both the $55 million reconciling item titled “Nondeductible items” and the $10.7 million reconciling item titled “Differences between foreign and US statutory rates.” If the 2014 goodwill impairment is not included in the line “Nondeductible items,” please tell us the reasons for the significant increase in this line.

2. We note from your response to our prior comment 2 that part of the tax rate adjustments in 2014 , which contributed to the tax benefit , was an actual statutory tax rate in Luxembourg that is different than the published statutory rate due to tax rulings received. Please tell us the nature of the tax rulings and any risks and uncertainties associated with those tax rulings, including expiration dates.

3. We note from your response to our prior comment 2 that one reason for the variance between the hypothetical tax expense and the actual tax expense is the exclusion or inclusion of certain items (reason 2).  Please tell us how reason 2 differs from “Non -deductible items” in your income tax rate reconciliation. It appears that both reflect book financial statement expenses that are not deductible for tax purposes.  It appears that reason 2 corresponds to the line “Non -United States income inclusions and ex clusions” in your income tax rate reconciliation in note 9. However, from your response, it appears that reason 2 applies to both U.S. and non -U.S. jurisdictions. Please confirm our understanding .

You may contact Claire Erlanger at (202) 551 -3301 or me at (202) 551 -3379 with any questions.

Sincerely,
/s/ Melissa Raminpour

Show Raw Text
June 16, 2015

Kathy Willard
Chief Financial Officer
Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.
9348 Civic Center Drive
Beverly Hills, California 90210

Re: Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.
 Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 2014
Response Dated May 27 , 2015
File No. 001 -32601

Dear Ms. Willard :

We have reviewed  your May 27 , 2015 response to our comment letter and have the
following comments .  In some of our comments, we may ask you to provide us with information
so we may better understand your disclosure.

Please r espond to these comments  within ten business days by  providing the requested
information or advise us as soon as possible when you will respond.  If you do not believe our
comments apply to your facts and circumstances, please tell us why in your response.

After reviewing your response to these  comments, we may have additional comments.
Unless we note otherwise, our references to prior comments are to comments in our May 1 2,
2015 letter .

Form 10 -K for the Year Ended December 31, 2014

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations

Consolidated Results of Operations, page 30

1. We note from your response  to our prior comment 2 that the table illustrating the
reconciling item titled “Differences between foreign and United States statutory rates”
includes adjustments for goodwill impairment and Luxembourg ruling benefit, which
result in an additional $25 million benefit.
 Please explain to us how you calculated or determined this $25 million benefit.   In
this regard, please tell us the tax -effected amount associated with the non -deductible
goodwill impairment of $117 million .
 In light of the fact that your response ind icates that the goodwill impairment is not
deductible for tax purposes (implying additional tax expense), please explain to us

Kathy Willard
Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.
June 16 , 2015
Page 2

 why it appears from your response that this goodwill impairment plus the
Luxembourg tax benefit, results in an increase to the ta x benefit.
 We note from Note 9 that the reconciliation of income tax computed at the US federal
statutory rates to income tax expense includes a separate line item titled
“Nondeductible items”, which is disclosed as primarily relating to the 2014 goodwil l
impairment that is not deductible for tax purposes.   Please clarify for us whether the
tax effects of this 2014 goodwill impairment is included in both the $55 million
reconciling item titled “Nondeductible items” and the $10.7 million reconciling item
titled “Differences between foreign and US statutory rates.”   If the 2014 goodwill
impairment is not included in the line “Nondeductible items,” please tell us the
reasons for the significant increase in this line.

2. We note from your response to our prior  comment 2 that part of the tax rate adjustments
in 2014 , which contributed to the tax benefit , was an actual statutory tax rate in
Luxembourg that is different than the published statutory rate due to tax rulings received.
Please tell us the nature of the tax rulings and any risks and uncertainties associated with
those tax  rulings, including expiration dates.

3. We note from your response to our prior comment 2 that one reason for the variance
between the hypothetical tax expense and the actual tax expense is the exclusion or
inclusion of certain items (reason 2).
 Please tell us how reason 2 differs from “Non -deductible items” in your income tax
rate reconciliation.   It appears that both reflect book financial statement expenses that
are not deductible for tax purposes.
 It appears that reason 2 corresponds to the line “Non -United States income inclusions
and ex clusions” in your income tax rate reconciliation in note 9.   However, from your
response, it appears that reason 2 applies to both U.S. and non -U.S.
jurisdictions.   Please confirm our understanding .

You may contact  Claire Erlanger  at (202) 551 -3301 or me at (202) 551 -3379  with any
questions.

Sincerely,

 /s/ Melissa Raminpour

 Melissa Raminpour
Branch Chief