SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Probe Scores Topics IPO Watchlist Monthly Activity About API

SEC Comment Letter for DIGITAL ALLY, INC. (KUST) (CIK 0001342958) (KUST) — Sep 15, 2015

DIGITAL ALLY, INC. (KUST) (CIK 0001342958)
Date: Sept. 15, 2015 · CIK: 0001342958 · Accession: 0000000000-15-045610

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

Sentiment
Urgency
Document Type
Confidence
SEC Posture
Company Posture

Summary

Reasoning

File numbers found in text: 333-206699

Date
September 3, 2015
Author
/s/ Kathleen Krebs, for
Form
UPLOAD
Company
DIGITAL ALLY, INC. (KUST) (CIK 0001342958)

Letter

Mail Stop 3720 September 3, 2015 Thomas Heckman Chief Financial Officer Digital Ally, Inc. 9705 Loiret Blvd. Lenexa, KS 66219

Re: Digital Ally, Inc. Registration Statement on Form S-3 Filed September 1, 2015 File No. 333-206699

Dear Mr. Heckman :

This is to advise you that we have not reviewed and will not review your registration statement .

We urge all persons who are responsible for the accuracy and adequacy of the disclosure in the filing to be certain that the filing includes the information the Securities Act of 193 3 and all applicable Securities Act rules require. Since the company and its management are in possession of all facts relating to a company’s disclosure, they are responsible for the accuracy and adequacy of the disclosures they have made.

In the event you request acceleration of the effective date of the pending regist ration statement , please provide a written statement from the company acknowledging that:

 should the Commission or the staff, acting pursuant to delegated authority, declare the filing effective, it does not foreclose the Commission from taking any action wit h respect to the filing;

 the action of the Commission or the staff, acting pursuant to delegated authority, in declaring the filing effective, does not relieve the company from its full responsibility for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in th e filing; and

 the company may not assert staff comments and the declaration of effectiveness as a defense in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of the United States.

Thomas J. Heckman Digital Ally, Inc. September 3, 2015 Page 2

Please refer to Rules 460 and 4 61 regarding requests for acceleration . We will consider a written request for acceleration of the effective date of the registration statement as confirmation of the fact that those requesting acceleration are aware of their respective responsibilities under the Securities Act of 1933 and th e Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as they relate to the proposed public offering of the registered securities .

Please contact Emily C. Drazan, Staff Attorney at 202-551-3208 with any questions.

Sincerely,
/s/ Kathleen Krebs, for

Show Raw Text
Mail Stop 3720

September 3, 2015

Thomas Heckman
Chief Financial  Officer
Digital Ally, Inc.
9705 Loiret Blvd.
Lenexa, KS 66219

Re: Digital Ally, Inc.
  Registration Statement on Form S-3
Filed  September 1, 2015
  File No.  333-206699

Dear Mr. Heckman :

This is to advise you that we have not  reviewed and will not review your registration
statement .

We urge all persons who are responsible for the accuracy and adequacy of the disclosure
in the filing to be certain that the filing includes the information the Securities Act of 193 3 and
all applicable Securities  Act rules require.   Since the company and its management are  in
possession of all facts relating to a company’s disclosure, they are responsible for the accuracy
and adequacy of the disclosures they have made.

In the event you request acceleration of the effective date of the pending regist ration
statement , please provide  a written statement from the company acknowledging that:

 should the Commission or the staff, acting pursuant to delegated authority, declare the
filing effective, it does not foreclose the Commission from taking any action wit h respect
to the filing;

 the action of the Commission or the staff, acting pursuant to delegated authority, in
declaring the filing effective, does not relieve the company from its full responsibility for
the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in th e filing; and

 the company may not assert staff comments and the declaration of effectiveness as a
defense in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal
securities laws of the United States.

Thomas J. Heckman
Digital Ally, Inc.
September 3, 2015
Page 2

 Please refer to Rules 460 and 4 61 regarding requests for  acceleration .  We will consider a
written request for acceleration of the effective date of the registration statement as confirmation
of the fact that those requesting acceleration are aware of their respective responsibilities under
the Securities Act of 1933 and th e Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as they relate to the proposed
public offering of the registered securities .

Please  contact  Emily C. Drazan, Staff Attorney  at 202-551-3208  with any questions.

Sincerely,

 /s/ Kathleen Krebs, for

Larry Spirgel
Assistant Director
AD Office  11 – Telecommunications

cc: Chris Hoffman, Esq.