SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Probe Scores Topics IPO Watchlist Monthly Activity About API

SEC Comment Letter for SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC (SD) (CIK 0001349436) (SD) — Jan 17, 2013

SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC (SD) (CIK 0001349436)
Date: Jan. 17, 2013 · CIK: 0001349436 · Accession: 0000000000-13-003056

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

Sentiment
Urgency
Document Type
Confidence
SEC Posture
Company Posture

Summary

Reasoning

Date
Jan. 17, 2013
Author
/s/ Perry J. Hindin
Form
UPLOAD
Company
SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC (SD) (CIK 0001349436)

Letter

January 17, 201 3 Via E -mail Scott F. Smith , Esq. Covington & Burling LLP 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018 -1405

Re: SandRidge Energy, Inc. Revised Preliminary Consent Revocation Statement on Schedule 14A Filed January 15, 201 3 File No. 001 -33784

Dear Mr. Smith :

We have reviewed the above filing and related response letter and have the following additional comment .

The removal and replacement of a majority of the Board …, page 8

1. We note the revised disclosure added in response to prior comment 3 . Notwithstanding the first sentence of the first bullet point of this section , the second paragraph as currently written implies that the election of the TPG -Axon Group Nominees would essentially cause a material adverse effect resulting from the Company ’s obligation to refinance up to $4.3 billion of the Company ’s senior notes. However, it appears that it is within the Board’s complete discretion to avoid the Company incur ring such obligation, simply by approving any TPG -Axon Group Nominees who may be duly elected to the Board by stockholders. P lease supplement the disclosure to make this point more clear . Also disclose the factors that the Board would consider in making its good faith determination that the election of one or more of the TPG -Axon Group Nominees would not be materially adverse to the interests of the Company o r its stockholders and whether the board would consider as part of such determination the “extre me, risk y and unnecessary financial burden ” to the Company resulting fro m the board ’s disapproval of such nominees and the related event of default and refinancing obligation .

When should I return my Consent Revocation Card? Page 13

2. Please update this section and the section entitled “Effectiveness of Consents ” to disclose the date by which valid, unrevoked consents signed by the holders of a majority of the shares of the Common Stock outstanding as of the Record Date must be delivered to the Company in order for the TPG -Axon Consent Proposals to become effective .

* * *

Scott F. Smith , Esq. Covington & Burling LLP January 17, 2013 Page 2

Please contact me at (202) 551 -3444 with any questions.

Sincerely,
/s/ Perry J. Hindin

Show Raw Text
January 17, 201 3

Via E -mail
Scott F. Smith , Esq.
Covington & Burling LLP
620 Eighth Avenue
New York, NY 10018 -1405

Re: SandRidge Energy, Inc.
 Revised Preliminary Consent Revocation Statement on Schedule 14A
Filed January 15, 201 3
File No. 001 -33784

Dear Mr. Smith :

We have reviewed the above filing  and related response letter  and have the following
additional comment .

The removal and replacement of a majority of the Board …, page 8

1. We note the revised disclosure added in response to prior comment 3 .  Notwithstanding
the first sentence of the first bullet point of this section , the second paragraph  as currently
written implies that  the election of the TPG -Axon Group Nominees would essentially
cause a material adverse effect resulting from the Company ’s obligation to refinance up
to $4.3 billion of the Company ’s senior notes.  However, it appears that it is within the
Board’s complete discretion to avoid the Company incur ring such obligation, simply by
approving any TPG -Axon Group Nominees who may be duly elected to the Board  by
stockholders.  P lease supplement the disclosure to make this point more clear .  Also
disclose  the factors that the Board would consider in making its good faith determination
that the election of one or more of the TPG -Axon Group Nominees would not be
materially adverse to the interests of the Company o r its stockholders and whether the
board would consider as part of such determination the “extre me, risk y and unnecessary
financial burden ” to the Company resulting fro m the board ’s disapproval  of such
nominees  and the related event of default and refinancing obligation .

When should I return my Consent Revocation Card?  Page 13

2. Please update this section and the section entitled “Effectiveness of Consents ” to disclose
the date by which valid, unrevoked consents signed by the holders of a majority of the
shares of the Common Stock outstanding as of the Record Date  must be delivered to the
Company in order for the TPG -Axon Consent Proposals to become effective .

* * *

Scott F. Smith , Esq.
Covington & Burling LLP
January 17, 2013
Page 2

Please contact me at (202) 551 -3444  with any questions.

Sincerely,

/s/ Perry J. Hindin

Perry J. Hindin
Special Counsel
Office of Mergers and Acquisitions