SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Probe Scores Topics IPO Watchlist Monthly Activity About API

SEC Comment Letter for UR-ENERGY INC (URG) (CIK 0001375205) (URG) — Jan 13, 2011

UR-ENERGY INC (URG) (CIK 0001375205)
Date: Jan. 13, 2011 · CIK: 0001375205 · Accession: 0000000000-11-002575

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

Sentiment
Urgency
Document Type
Confidence
SEC Posture
Company Posture

Summary

Reasoning

Referenced dates: August 20, 2010, December 17, 2010, November 4, 2010

Date
January 13, 2011
Author
H. Roger Schwall
Form
UPLOAD
Company
UR-ENERGY INC (URG) (CIK 0001375205)

Letter

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549-4628 DIVISION OF CORPORATION FINANCE MAIL STOP 4628 January 13, 2011 Mr. Roger Smith Chief Financial Officer Ur-Energy Incorporated 10758 W. Centennial Road, Suite 200 Littleton, Colorado 80127 Re: Ur-Energy Incorporated Form 20-F for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2009 Filed March 12, 2010 Response letter dated August 20, 2010 Response letter dated November 4, 2010 Response Letter dated December 17, 2010 File No. 1-33905

Dear Mr. Smith: We have reviewed your response letter dated December 17, 2010 and have the following comments. In some of our comments, we may ask you to provide us with information so we may better understand your disclosure. Please respond to this letter within ten business days by amending your filing, by providing the requested information, or by advising us when you will provide the requested response. If you do not believe our comments apply to your facts and circumstances or do not believe an amendment is appropriate, please tell us why in your response. After reviewing any amendment to your filing and the information you provide in response to these comments, we may have additional comments.

Form 20-F for Fiscal Year Ending December 31, 2009 filed March 12, 2010

Mr. Roger Smith Ur-Energy Incorporated January 13, 2011 Page 2

General

1. We note your response to our previous comment number 2 filed December 17, 2010. Your proposed amendment now contains a range of tons, grade, and contained uranium with respect to exploration potential. More specifically you state “LC North and LC South, which c ontain multiple exploration targets and demonstrate the potential to contain 24 to 28 million pounds U3O8 in 20.7 to 24.1 million tons, with an average grade of 0.058% U3O8.” Referencing section 2.3 (2) of National Instrument 43-101, a potential mineral deposit that is to be the target of further exploration may be disclosed as a range of potential quantity and grade. Please concur that you will remove the “24 to 28 million pounds U 3O8”disclosure in future filings. Closing Comments

We urge all persons who are responsible for the accuracy and adequacy of the disclosure in the filing to be certain that the filing includes the information the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and all applicable Exchange Act rules require. Since the company and its management are in possession of all facts relating to a company’s disclosure, they are responsible for the accuracy and adequacy of the disclosures they have made. In responding to our comments, please provide a written statement from the company acknowledging that:

• the company is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in the filing; • staff comments or changes to disclosure in response to staff comments do not foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to the filing; and • the company may not assert staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of the United States.

You may contact John Coleman at (202) 551-3610 with questions about engineering comments. Please contact me at (202) 551-3740 with any other questions. S i n c e r e l y , H. Roger Schwall Assistant Director

Show Raw Text
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549-4628

DIVISION OF
CORPORATION FINANCE MAIL STOP 4628
        January 13, 2011

Mr. Roger Smith
Chief Financial Officer Ur-Energy Incorporated 10758 W. Centennial Road, Suite 200 Littleton, Colorado 80127
 Re: Ur-Energy Incorporated
  Form 20-F for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2009
Filed March 12, 2010 Response letter dated August 20, 2010 Response letter dated November 4, 2010 Response Letter dated December 17, 2010 File No. 1-33905

   Dear Mr. Smith:
We have reviewed your response letter dated December 17, 2010 and have the
following comments. In some of our comments, we may ask you to provide us with information so we may better understand your disclosure.
 Please respond to this letter within ten business days by amending your filing, by
providing the requested information, or by advising us when you will provide the requested response. If you do not believe our comments apply to your facts and circumstances or do not believe an amendment is appropriate, please tell us why in your response.
 After reviewing any amendment to your filing and the information you provide in
response to these comments, we may have additional comments.

Form 20-F for Fiscal Year Ending December 31, 2009 filed March 12, 2010

Mr. Roger Smith
Ur-Energy Incorporated January 13, 2011 Page 2

General

1. We note your response to our previous comment number 2 filed December 17,
2010.  Your proposed amendment now contains a range of tons, grade, and contained uranium with respect to exploration potential.  More specifically you state “LC North and LC South, which c ontain multiple exploration targets and
demonstrate the potential to contain 24 to 28 million pounds U3O8 in 20.7 to 24.1 million tons, with an average grade of 0.058% U3O8.”  Referencing section 2.3 (2) of National Instrument 43-101, a potential mineral deposit that is to be the target of further exploration may be disclosed as a range of potential quantity and grade.   Please concur that you will remove the “24 to 28 million pounds U
3O8”disclosure in future filings.
 Closing Comments

  We urge all persons who are responsible for the accuracy and adequacy of the disclosure in the filing to be certain that the filing includes the information the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and all applicable Exchange Act rules require. Since the company and its management are in possession of all facts relating to a company’s disclosure, they are responsible for the accuracy and adequacy of the disclosures they have made.
In responding to our comments, please provide a written statement from the
company acknowledging that:

• the company is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in the
filing;
• staff comments or changes to disclosure in response to staff comments do not
foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to the filing; and
• the company may not assert staff comments as a defense in any proceeding
initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of the United States.

You may contact John Coleman at (202) 551-3610 with questions about
engineering comments.  Please contact me at (202) 551-3740 with any other questions.
         S i n c e r e l y ,
H. Roger Schwall Assistant Director