SEC Company Response from SARATOGA INVESTMENT CORP. (SAJ, SAR, SAT, SAV, SAY, SAZ) (CIK 0001377936) (SAJ) — Jul 1, 2021
SARATOGA INVESTMENT CORP. (SAJ, SAR, SAT, SAV, SAY, SAZ) (CIK 0001377936)
Date: July 1, 2021 · CIK: 0001377936 · Accession: 0001213900-21-035291
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
File numbers found in text: 333-256366
Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm
[Letterhead of Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP]
July 1,
2021
VIA EDGAR
David L. Orlic, Senior Counsel
Jeff Long, Accountant
U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission
100 F Street, N.E.
Washington, D.C. 20549-4720
Re: Saratoga Investment Corp.
Registration
Statement on Form N-2 (File No. 333-256366)
Dear Mr. Orlic and Mr. Long:
On behalf of Saratoga Investment
Corp. (the “Company”), set forth below are the Company’s responses to the legal and accounting comments
received during a telephone call on June 22, 2021 with the staff of the Division of Investment Management (the “Staff”)
of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) relating to the Company’s Registration Statement
on Form N-2 (File No. 333-256366) (the “Registration Statement”), which was filed with the SEC on May 21, 2021.
The Staff’s legal and
accounting comments are set forth below in italics and are followed by the Company’s responses. Where revisions to the Registration
Statement are referenced in the Company’s responses set forth below, such revisions are included in Amendment No. 1 to the Registration
Statement (the “Amended Registration Statement”). Capitalized terms used in this letter but not otherwise defined
herein have the meanings specified in the Registration Statement.
Legal Comments
1. Comment: During the last fiscal year,
the Company’s filer status changed from “accelerated filer” to “non-accelerated filer.” On a supplemental
basis, please provide the Staff with the calculations and measurement dates that the Company used to determine that it was no longer
an accelerated filer.
Response:
The Company respectfully advises the Staff on a supplemental basis that, as provided in the SEC’s final rule “Accelerated
Filer and Large Accelerated Filer Definitions” adopted on March 12, 2020 (the “Final Rule”), business
development companies (“BDCs”) are excluded from the accelerated and large accelerated filer definitions if
the BDC (i) as of its most recently completed second fiscal quarter has a public float of $75 million or more, but less than $700 million,
and (ii) as of its most recently completed fiscal year end has an investment income of less than $100 million, for which a BDC’s
revenue serves as the investment income, as defined in Rule 6-07.1 of Regulation S-X. The Company confirms to the Staff that it had a
public float of $154,772,873.76 as of August 31, 2020, the Company’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, and investment
income (i.e., the Company’s revenue) of $57,650,256 as of February 28, 2021, the Company’s most recently completed fiscal
year end. Therefore, the Company was excluded from the definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer under the Final Rule,
and as a result, changed its filer status to “non-accelerated”.
2. Comment: In the Fees and Expenses table
on page 8 of the Registration Statement, please round each figure to the nearest hundredth instead of the nearest tenth.
Response:
The Company has revised page 8 of the Amended Registration Statement to reflect the Staff’s comment.
3. Comment: Please update the Incorporation
of Certain Information by Reference section on page 77 of the Registration Statement to include Current Reports on Form 8-K that were
filed after the Company’s most recent fiscal year end.
Response:
The Company has revised page 77 of the Amended Registration Statement to reflect the Staff’s comment.
4. Prior to the effectiveness of the Registration Statement,
please provide the Staff with a draft of the legal opinion.
Response:
The Company confirms to the Staff that it has provided the Staff with a draft of the legal opinion prior to the effectiveness of the Registration
Statement.
Accounting Comments
5. Comment:
With respect to the “Example” table on page 10 of the Registration Statement, please consider including two examples, one
reflecting an incentive fee on capital gains, and the other excluding such incentive fee on capital gains.
Response:
The Company has revised page 10 of the Amended Registration Statement to reflect the Staff's comment.
6. Comment: With respect to the “Realized
loss on extinguishment of debt” line item under the “Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:” sub-section of the
Selected Financial and Other Data section on page 12 of the Registration Statement, please advise the Staff of whether the reclassification
impacted the incentive fee for the past two fiscal years, and why the loss moved out of the expense section.
Response:
The Company respectfully advises the Staff on a supplemental basis that such reclassification had no impact on the incentive fee calculation,
as realized loss on extinguishment of borrowings is excluded from the incentive fee calculations. This reclassification was done to consistently
present this realized loss on extinguishment of borrowings with other realized and unrealized losses in the Consolidated Statements of
Operations, separate from operating expenses.
7. Comment: On pages 24 and 29 of the Registration
Statement, please hyperlink the references to the Company’s most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Response:
The Company has revised the Amended Registration Statement to reflect the Staff’s comment.
* * * * *
If you have any questions or additional comments
concerning the foregoing, please contact me at (202) 383-0278.
Sincerely,
/s/ Payam Siadatpour
Payam Siadatpour
cc: Christian L. Oberbeck, Chief Executive Officer, Saratoga Investment
Corp.
Henri J. Steenkamp, Chief Financial Officer, Saratoga
Investment Corp.
Steven B. Boehm, Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP