SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Probe Scores Topics IPO Watchlist Monthly Activity About API

SEC Comment Letter for Melco Resorts & Entertainment LTD (MLCO) (CIK 0001381640) (MLCO) — Jun 7, 2016

Melco Resorts & Entertainment LTD (MLCO) (CIK 0001381640)
Date: June 7, 2016 · CIK: 0001381640 · Accession: 0000000000-16-079622

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

Sentiment
Urgency
Document Type
Confidence
SEC Posture
Company Posture

Summary

Reasoning

File numbers found in text: 001-33178

Date
June 7, 2016
Author
/s/ Kristi Marrone
Form
UPLOAD
Company
Melco Resorts & Entertainment LTD (MLCO) (CIK 0001381640)

Letter

Mailstop 3233 June 7, 2016 Via E -Mail Geoffrey Stuart Davis Chief Financial Officer Melco Crown Entertainment Limited 36th Floor, The Centrium 60 Wyndham Street Central , Hong Kong

Re: Melco Crown Entertainment Limited Form 20 -F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 Filed April 12, 2016 File No. 001-33178

Dear Mr. Davis:

We have limited our review of your filing to the financial statements and related disclosures and have the following comments. In some of our comments, we may ask you to provide us with information so we may better understand your disclosure.

Please respond to these comments within ten busine ss days by providing the requested information or advis e us as soon as possible when you will respond. If you do not believe our comments apply to your facts and circumstances, please tell us why in your response.

After reviewing your response to these comments, we may have additional comments.

Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

(h) Property and Equipment, Net, page F -15 1. We note that effective October 1, 2015, you extended the useful lives for certain building assets to 40 years from 25 years to reflect the estimated period duri ng which the buildings are expected to remain in service. Please address the following: a. For the extended useful lives of certain buildings at your Macau -based properties, tell us what factors changed supporting your conclusion that a 40 -year useful life was more appropriate. In your response, address whether such extension from a 25-year useful life was a change in accounting estimate or the correction of an error in your previously issued financial statements . Refer to ASC 250 -10-45.

Geoffrey Stuart Davis Melco Crown Entertainment Limited June 7, 2016 Page 2

b. Given your building assets are located on land granted by the Macau government for a period of 25 years and renewable for further consecutive periods of 10 years subject to applicable legislation, tell us how you determined the useful lives of the buildings would exceed the life of the land lease agreements entered with the Macau government. In your response, address your ability to renew the leases considering such leases are subject to applicable legislation in Macau. c. Tell us the basis for the estimated useful lives for pr operties in the remainder of your portfolio. Specifically address the useful lives of buildings at your recently opened Studio City property, as we note you address the change in the estimated lease term for leases under land concession contracts includes your Studio City property.

(n) Land Use Rights, Net, page F -17 2. We note that effective October 1, 2015, similar to the extension of useful lives attributable to certain building assets, you extended the estimated term of the leases under applicable land concession contracts. Please address the following: a. For the extension of the estimated term of leases under land concession contracts, tell us what factors changed supporting your conclusion that a 40 -year term was more appropriate. In your response, add ress whether such extension from a 25 - year term was a change in accounting estimate or the correction of an error in your previously issued financial statements . Refer to ASC 250 -10-45. b. Given your land concession contracts that have been granted by the Ma cau government have an initial term of 25 years and are renewable for further consecutive periods of 10 years subject to applicable legislation, tell us how you determined the estimated term of the land concession contracts would exceed the life of the lan d concession contracts entered with the Macau government. In your response, address your ability to renew the leases considering such leases are subject to applicable legislation in Macau.

We urge all persons who are responsible for the accuracy and adeq uacy of the disclosure in the filing to be certain that the filing includes the information the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and all applicable Exchange Act rules require. Since the company and its management are in possession of all facts relating to a company’s disclosure, they are responsible for the accuracy and adequacy of the disclosures they have made.

In responding to our comments, please provide a written statement from the company acknowledging that:

 the company is responsible for the ade quacy and accuracy of the disclosure in the filing;

 staff comments or changes to disclosure in response to staff comments do not foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to the filing; and

Geoffrey Stuart Davis Melco Crown Entertainment Limited June 7, 2016 Page 3

 the company may not assert staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of the United States.

You may contact Mark Rakip, Staff Accountant at 202.551.3573 or me at 202.551.3429 if you have questions regarding comments on the financial s tatements and related matters.

Sincerely,
/s/ Kristi Marrone

Show Raw Text
Mailstop 3233

June 7, 2016

Via E -Mail
Geoffrey Stuart Davis
Chief Financial Officer
Melco Crown Entertainment Limited
36th Floor, The Centrium
60 Wyndham Street
Central , Hong Kong

Re: Melco Crown Entertainment Limited
 Form 20 -F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015
Filed April 12, 2016
File No. 001-33178

Dear Mr. Davis:

We have limited our review  of your filing  to the financial statements and related
disclosures and have the following comments.  In some of our comments, we may ask you to
provide us with information so we may better understand your disclosure.

Please respond to these comments  within ten busine ss days by providing the requested
information or advis e us as soon as possible when you will respond.  If you do not believe our
comments apply to your facts and circumstances, please tell us why in your response.

After reviewing your response to these  comments, we may have  additional comments.

Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

(h) Property and Equipment, Net, page F -15
1. We note that effective October 1, 2015, you extended the useful lives for certain building
assets to 40 years from 25 years to reflect the estimated period duri ng which the buildings
are expected to remain in service.  Please address the following:
a. For the extended useful lives of certain buildings at your Macau -based properties,
tell us what factors changed supporting your conclusion that a 40 -year useful life
was more appropriate.  In your response, address whether such extension from a
25-year useful life was a change in accounting estimate or the correction of an
error in your previously issued financial statements .  Refer to ASC 250 -10-45.

Geoffrey Stuart Davis
Melco Crown Entertainment Limited
June 7, 2016
Page 2

 b. Given your building  assets are located on land granted by the Macau government
for a period of 25 years and renewable for further consecutive periods of 10 years
subject to applicable legislation, tell us how you determined the useful lives of the
buildings would exceed the life of the land lease agreements entered with the
Macau government.  In your response, address your ability to renew the leases
considering such leases are subject to applicable legislation in Macau.
c. Tell us the basis for the estimated useful lives for pr operties in the remainder of
your portfolio.  Specifically address the useful lives of buildings at your recently
opened Studio City property, as we note you address the change in the estimated
lease term for leases under land concession contracts includes  your Studio City
property.

(n) Land Use Rights, Net, page F -17
2. We note that effective October 1, 2015, similar to the extension of useful lives
attributable to certain building assets, you extended the estimated term of the leases under
applicable land concession contracts.  Please address the following:
a. For the extension of the estimated term of leases under land concession contracts,
tell us what factors changed supporting your conclusion that a 40 -year term was
more appropriate.  In your response, add ress whether such extension from a 25 -
year term was a change in accounting estimate or the correction of an error in
your previously issued financial statements .  Refer to ASC 250 -10-45.
b. Given your land concession contracts that have been granted by the Ma cau
government have an initial term of 25 years and are renewable for further
consecutive periods of 10 years subject to applicable legislation, tell us how you
determined the estimated term of the land concession contracts would exceed the
life of the lan d concession contracts entered with the Macau government.  In your
response, address your ability to renew the leases considering such leases are
subject to applicable legislation in Macau.

We urge all persons who are responsible for the accuracy and adeq uacy of the disclosure
in the filing to be certain that the filing includes the information the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and all applicable Exchange Act rules require.   Since the company and its management are
in possession of all facts relating to a company’s disclosure, they are responsible for the accuracy
and adequacy of the disclosures they have made.

 In responding to our comments, please provide  a written statement from the company
acknowledging that:

 the company is responsible for the ade quacy and accuracy of the disclosure in the filing;

 staff comments or changes to disclosure in response to staff comments do not foreclose
the Commission from taking any action with respect to the filing; and

Geoffrey Stuart Davis
Melco Crown Entertainment Limited
June 7, 2016
Page 3

 the company may not assert staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated by
the Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of the United States.

You may contact Mark Rakip, Staff Accountant at 202.551.3573 or me at 202.551.3429
if you have questions regarding comments on the financial s tatements and related matters.

Sincerely,

 /s/ Kristi Marrone

Kristi  Marrone
Staff Accountant
Office of Real Estate and
Commodities