SecProbe.io

CORRESP
1
filename1.htm

SEC Response Letter

 November 29, 2012

 VIA COURIER AND EDGAR

RE:

The Blackstone Group L.P.

 Form 10-K for the Year Ended

December 31, 2011

File No. 1-33551

 Mr. Rufus Decker

 Accounting Branch Chief

 Securities and Exchange Commission

Division of Corporation Finance

 100 F Street,
N.E.

 Washington, D.C. 20549

 Dear
Mr. Decker:

 On behalf of The Blackstone Group L.P. (“Blackstone”), we are responding to your comment letter dated
October 29, 2012 regarding our Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 2011.

To assist your review, we have retyped the text of the Staff’s comments in italics below. Please note that references to page numbers
in our responses refer to the
page numbers of our EDGAR-filed December 31, 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K (“2011 Form 10-K”).

 FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011

General

1.
Following our telephone conversation and the responses to comments you have already provided, we believe we have a better understanding of aspects of your
compensation program, and have the comments below. Where we have asked for explanations of your programs and disclosures below, please provide us with information supplementally, and provide similar explanatory disclosures in future filings. Please
also provide us supplementally with a draft of what your disclosures, so revised, would have looked like with respect to 2011.

 We acknowledge the Staff’s comment and, where appropriate, have provided the Staff with a draft of what our disclosures, as revised, would have looked like with respect to 2011.

 The Blackstone Group LP

 345 Park Avenue New York NY 10154

T 212 583 5000 F 212 583 5749

 www.blackstone.com

 Mr. Rufus Decker

 November 29, 2012

  Page
 2
 of 10

 Item 11. Executive Compensation

Compensation Elements for Named Executive Officers, page 208

2.
You disclose that indicative participation interests are disclosed to a named executive officer at the beginning of “the relevant” year, but the ultimate
cash payments paid to the named executive officers at the end of the year are determined in the discretion of Mr. Schwarzman. We also note your “Determination of Incentive Compensation” disclosure on page 210 where you state that
“indicative participation interests disclosed to the named executive officer at the beginning of the year” is one of the factors considered by Mr. Schwarzman in determining an executive officer’s incentive compensation amount. In
future filings, please revise your disclosure to explain the intended meaning of the term “relevant” year. To the extent that an executive’s indicative participation interest during the term of an investment gets adjusted annually or
otherwise, to reflect, among other things, an executive’s role and performance with respect to a particular investment, so disclose. If true, please state that the indicative participation interest, as adjusted, does not represent a
committed percentage of the carried interest, either on a project basis or fund basis.

 We will revise
in future filings our disclosure regarding the elements of compensation for named executive officers to explain more clearly that the indicative interests that are disclosed to a named executive officer at the beginning of any year represent
estimates of the expected percentage participation that such named executive officer may have in the earnings of the relevant business unit(s) for that same year. The relevant disclosure with respect to 2011, as revised, would have been as follows:

 “Indicative participation interests for each year were disclosed to a named executive officer at the beginning of
such year and represented estimates of the expected percentage participation that such named executive officer would have been expected to have in the relevant business unit(s)’ earnings for that same year.”

We also advise the Staff that the indicative participation interests in the earnings of the firm’s business units disclosed to named
executive officers at the beginning of each year relate to the earnings of the business unit itself. They do not relate to any particular investment nor do they represent a committed percentage of the carried interest either on a project basis or
fund basis.

3.
Please clarify whether the annual cash payments you describe as “participation interests in the earnings of the firm’s various investment and advisory
businesses” under “2. Annual Cash Payments/Deferred Equity Awards” are distinct from the participations in carried interest and incentive fees you describe under “3. Participation in Performance Fees”. For
example, are the cash payments under the former related to participation in the performance of an entire business unit or fund, while cash payments under the latter are related to participation in the performance of a particular investment within a
fund? Please also disclose where you reflect the annual cash payments and deferred equity awards in the Summary Compensation Table. We note that you disclose that you reflect cash distributions of carried interest and incentive fees in the “All
Other Compensation” column.

 Mr. Rufus Decker

 November 29, 2012

  Page
 3
 of 10

 We advise the Staff that the annual cash payments described as “participation
interests in the earnings of the firm’s various investment and advisory businesses” under “2. Annual Cash Payments/Deferred Equity Awards” are distinct from the participations in carried interest and incentive fees
described under “3. Participation in Performance Fees”.

 The “Annual Cash Payments/Deferred Equity
Awards” on pages 208-209 refer to bonus and equity compensation to executives based on (a) the prior and anticipated performance of the named executive officer, (b) the prior and anticipated performance of the segments and product
lines in which the officer serves and for which he has responsibility, and (c) the estimated participation interests given to the officer at the beginning of the year. As noted below in response to the Staff’s comment 7, cash bonus
compensation paid is reflected in the “Bonus” column of the Summary Compensation Table on page 212 and Deferred Equity Awards are reflected in the “Stock Awards” column of the Summary Compensation Table on page 212.

By contrast, the executives’ carried interest or incentive fee compensation results from their respective participation interests in
the carry or incentive fee pools generated by our carry funds or the incentive fees of our funds that pay incentive fees. Compensation from these participation interests is reflected in the “All Other Compensation” column of the Summary
Compensation Table on page 212.

 Summary Compensation Table, page 212

4.
Please include narrative disclosure to accompany the table that clearly explains the reasons why you present cash distributions of carried interest and incentive
fees, as opposed to accrued compensation expense, in the “All Other Compensation” column. Provide sufficient disclosure so that investors understand both the advantages and shortcomings of each method of disclosure. For example, while you
may believe that cash best correlates with the firm’s distributable earnings, we understand that accrual is consistent with the financial statement disclosure of compensation expense and might better reflect the performance of the funds from
which dedicated carried interest compensation is derived, which may be relevant if carried interest compensation, or the operation of a clawback provision to reduce carried interest compensation, is based on fund performance.

 We advise the Staff that we will include disclosure accompanying the Summary Compensation Table that more
clearly explains the reasons why we present cash distributions of carried interest and incentive fees, as opposed to accrued compensation expense, in the “All Other Compensation” column. A draft of what the revised disclosure would have
looked like with respect to 2011 is set forth on Exhibit A.

5.
 Please clarify whether the cash amounts shown in the “All Other Compensation” column also include amounts escrowed to help fund potential
future “clawback” obligations. If

 Mr. Rufus Decker

 November 29, 2012

  Page
 4
 of 10

they do not, please explain the basis for excluding these amounts. We note, from your disclosure on page 207, that you typically escrow a portion of all carried interest payments made for this
purpose. Please also tell us what consideration you have given to separately disclosing the amount of the cash distribution that is escrowed in a footnote. Please also tell us whether and how the operation of a clawback provision with respect to any
compensation currently disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table would impact your future disclosures.

 We
advise the Staff that the amounts included in the “All Other Compensation” column do include amounts escrowed to help fund future clawback obligations and that a clawback event would reduce the amounts disclosed in “All Other
Compensation” in the year that the clawback is realized. We advise the Staff that we do not believe that the inclusion of additional detail regarding the amounts of carried interest payments that have been placed in escrow to address the
possibility of a future clawback would meaningfully enhance the ability of the reader to understand the compensation of our named executive officers.

6.
We note your response to comment eight in our letter dated June 11, 2012. We also note that participation in carried interest or incentive fees is a central
means of compensating and motivating your named executive officers, as it is for some of your competitors with whom you compete for executive talent (refer to first paragraph of your Participation in Performance Fees” disclosure on page 209).
As such, to help the investors better understand the annual compensation earned by your named executive officers, in future filings, please continue to disclose the expense accrual currently found in footnote (b) to the summary
compensation table. We note your response to comment 12 in our letter dated May 3, 2012 where you state that footnote disclosure of carried interest or incentive fee allocations on an accrual basis was intended to transition the disclosure.

 We acknowledge the Staff’s comment and will continue to include the accrual basis disclosure (as set
forth on Exhibit A) in a footnote to the Summary Compensation Table in future filings.

7.
Please explain the basis upon which you have excluded the deferred portions of Mr. Hill’s bonus compensation from the Bonus column of the Summary
Compensation Table. Please note that Instruction 4 to Item 402(c) provides that any amount deferred, whether pursuant to a plan established under section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code or otherwise, must be included in the appropriate
column for the fiscal year in which it is earned. We may have additional comments following the review of your response.

 We advise the Staff that we have excluded the deferred portions of Mr. Hill’s bonus compensation from the Bonus column of the Summary Compensation Table because we have reflected the Deferred
Equity Awards he received in lieu thereof (including the premium award) in the Stock Awards column for the fiscal year in which it was earned. We have reflected the aggregate grant date fair value of the Deferred Equity Awards computed in accordance
with FASB ASC Topic 718 in the Stock Awards column in accordance with the requirements of Item 402(c)(2)(v) of Regulation S-K. We will revise

 Mr. Rufus Decker

 November 29, 2012

  Page
 5
 of 10

the footnote to the Stock Awards column in future filings to so clarify. We also supplementally advise the Staff that the reason the grant date fair value of the Deferred Equity Awards is
different from the cash value of the awards previously disclosed in the footnotes to the Bonus column is because the number of deferred restricted common units granted is determined based on the cash value of the awards, using a 30-day volume
weighted average price calculation method and the grant date fair value of awards is computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. A draft of what the revised disclosure would have looked like with respect to 2011 is set forth on Exhibit A.

8.
Please clarify the nature of the compensation for Mr. Hill as reflected in the “All Other Compensation” column. The disclosure in footnote (b) to
the table refers to your carried interest and incentive fee allocations relating to your “Performance Plans”. Disclosure on page 209 states that Mr. Hill did not participate in your “Performance Plans.” If the amounts in the
table allocable to Mr. Hill are intended to represent cash payments based upon the performance of your Hedge Fund Solutions business, please clarify this in the footnote and on page 208 where you describe those payments.

 Mr. Hill did not participate in the Performance Plans from Blackstone’s initial public offering
(IPO) through the end of 2011. The amounts reflected in “All Other Compensation” for Mr. Hill in 2011, 2010 and 2009 represent a combination of residual proceeds received in respect of pre-IPO transactions and clawback in respect of
carried interest received in prior years. We will enhance the disclosure in future filings to so clarify and advise the Staff that a draft of what the revised disclosure would have looked like for 2011 is set forth on Exhibit A hereto. Starting in
2012, Mr. Hill did participate in the Performance Plans, and the amounts reflected in “All Other Compensation” for Mr. Hill for 2012 in our 2012 Form 10-K will also include any carried interest and incentive fee allocations relating to
such Performance Plans (in addition to any residual proceeds or clawback amounts).

9.
Please tell us supplementally, with a view toward disclosure in future filings, why the Summary Compensation Table shows a negative amount of cash distributed to
Mr. Hill in 2010 in the “All Other Compensation” column. For example, did he receive carried interest compensation in an earlier year that became subject to a clawback provision? We may have further comments upon review of your
response.

 Mr. Hill has $(13,345) in 2010 in “All Other Compensation”. This consists primarily
of a clawback on carried interest received in prior years that he was required to pay. We will enhance the disclosure in future filings to so clarify and advise the Staff that a draft of what the revised disclosure would have looked like for 2011 is
set forth on Exhibit A hereto.

 Mr. Rufus Decker

 November 29, 2012

  Page
 6
 of 10

 * * *

 Please do not hesitate to call me at 212-583-5205 with any questions or further comments you may have regarding this filing or if you wish to discuss the above responses.

Very truly yours,

 /s/ Laurence A. Tosi

Laurence A. Tosi

Chief Financial Officer

cc:
Securities and Exchange Commission

 Ms. Era Anagnosti, Staff Attorney

 Ms. Pamela Long, Assistant Director

Ms. Nudrat Salik, Staff Accountant

 Mr. Rufus Decker

 November 29, 2012

  Page
 7
 of 10

 Exhibit A

 Information in Response to Comments #4, #6, #7, #8 and #9.

 Summary Compensation Table
(Marked to Show Changes from the 2011 Form 10-K)

 The following table provides summary information concerning the
compensation of our Chief Executive Officer, our Chief Financial Officer and each of our three other most highly compensated employees who served as executive officers at December 31, 2011, for services rendered to us during 2011, 2010 and
2009. These individuals are referred to as our named executive officers in this annual report:

 Name and Principal Position

Year

Salary

Bonus

Stock
Awards (a)

All Other
Compensation (b)

Total

 Stephen A. Schwarzman

2011

$
350,000

$
—

$
—

$
4,609,445

$
4,959,445

 Chairman and

2010

$
350,000

$
—

$
—

$
2,475,766

$
2,825,766

 Chief Executive Officer

2009

$
350,000

$
—

$
—

$
424,073

$
774,073

 Hamilton E. James

2011

$
350,000

$
26,193,619