SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Probe Scores Topics IPO Watchlist Monthly Activity About API

SEC Company Response from Ulta Beauty, Inc. (ULTA) (CIK 0001403568) (ULTA) — Oct 24, 2007

Ulta Beauty, Inc. (ULTA) (CIK 0001403568)
Date: Oct. 24, 2007 · CIK: 0001403568 · Accession: 0000950124-07-005263

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

Sentiment
Urgency
Document Type
Confidence
SEC Posture
Company Posture

Summary

Reasoning

File numbers found in text: 333-144405

Referenced dates: October 19, 2007

Date
Oct. 24, 2007
Author
/s/ Christopher D. Lueking
Form
CORRESP
Company
Ulta Beauty, Inc. (ULTA) (CIK 0001403568)

Letter

Christopher D. Lueking

Sears Tower, Suite 5800

Direct Dial: (312) 876-7680

233 S. Wacker Dr.

christopher.lueking@lw.com

Chicago, Illinois 60606

Tel: +1.312.876.7700 Fax: +1.312.993.9767

www.lw.com

FIRM / AFFILIATE OFFICES

Barcelona

New Jersey

Brussels

New York

Chicago

Northern Virginia

Frankfurt

Orange County

Hamburg

Paris

Hong Kong

San Diego

London

San Francisco

Los Angeles

Shanghai

Madrid

Silicon Valley

Milan

Singapore

Moscow

Tokyo

Munich

Washington, D.C.

File No. 025341-0028

October 24, 2007

Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street, N.E.

Mailstop 3561

Washington, D.C. 20549

Attention:

H. Christopher Owings

Scott Anderegg

Re:

Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc. — Amendment No. 7

Registration Statement on Form S-1

File No. 333-144405

Ladies and Gentlemen:

On behalf of Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), we hereby submit responses of the Company to comments received from the Staff in a letter from H. Christopher Owings, dated October 23, 2007 (the “Comment Letter”). In addition, we have reflected the changes noted below in Amendment No. 7 (the “Amendment”) to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (the “Registration Statement”), including certain exhibits. A courtesy copy of this letter is being submitted to the Staff by hand delivery.

1.

We note your response to comment 2 in our letter dated October 19, 2007. We further note that your disclosure of the name of the natural person(s), public entities, majority-owned subsidiaries of public entities or registered investment companies who have investment and/or voting control over the respective selling stockholders is incomplete or unclear as indicated below;

•

You have provided no beneficial ownership information as to Feigin Trading Co.

Response: In response to the Staff’s comment, we have deleted Feigin Trading Co. from the “Selling stockholder” table. See page 101.

•

Footnote (2) to the Selling Stockholder table appears to refer to the beneficial ownership of one “entity,” however, this footnote has been attributed to several selling stockholders; and

October 24, 2007

Page 2

Response: In response to the Staff’s comment, we have revised footnote 2 to clarify that the footnote applies to more than one entity. Please see page 101.

•

With respect to Bank of America Ventures (footnote 4), Bank of America Capital Corporation (footnote 4), Jewish Communal Fund (footnote 13), JP Morgan Chase Bank (footnote 14) and Appomattox Foundation (footnote 16), your disclosures are incomplete in that they do not identify the beneficial owners of the respective shares. We note your indication that “no one person acting alone has investment and voting power as to these shares,” however, the fact does not avail you of the requirement that you disclose the persons with beneficial ownership of such shares.

Response: In response to the Staff’s comment, we have amended footnotes 4 and 13 to include the information requested. Please see pages 101 — 102. In addition, we advise the Staff that we are using best efforts to obtain the information requested as to footnotes 14 and 16. We intend to file an amendment to the Registration Statement as soon as possible after receiving the remaining information.

2.

We note that you have submitted a requested effectiveness for 4:00 p.m. on October 24, 2007. In connection with your request you have provide certain representations and we note that in the third representation that you indicate that you will not assert our declaring you effective as a defense. Your third representation should also represent that you may not assert staff comments as a defense. Please revise your request accordingly.

Response: In response to the Staff’s comment, we have revised the acceleration request, as indicated, and have resubmitted the request.

If you have any questions regarding the foregoing responses or the enclosed Amendment or need additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at (312) 876-7680 or Seth Diehl at (312) 876-7634.

Very truly yours,
/s/ Christopher D. Lueking

Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm

corresp

    Christopher D. Lueking

    Sears Tower, Suite 5800

    Direct Dial: (312) 876-7680

    233 S. Wacker Dr.

    christopher.lueking@lw.com

    Chicago, Illinois 60606

    Tel: +1.312.876.7700 Fax: +1.312.993.9767

    www.lw.com

    FIRM / AFFILIATE OFFICES

    Barcelona

    New Jersey

    Brussels

    New York

    Chicago

    Northern Virginia

    Frankfurt

    Orange County

    Hamburg

    Paris

    Hong Kong

    San Diego

    London

    San Francisco

    Los Angeles

    Shanghai

    Madrid

    Silicon Valley

    Milan

    Singapore

    Moscow

    Tokyo

    Munich

    Washington, D.C.

    File No. 025341-0028

October 24, 2007

    Securities and Exchange Commission

    100 F Street, N.E.

    Mailstop 3561

    Washington, D.C. 20549

    Attention:

    H. Christopher Owings

    Scott Anderegg

    Re:

    Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc. — Amendment No. 7

    Registration Statement on Form S-1

    File No. 333-144405

Ladies and Gentlemen:

     On behalf of Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
“Company”), we hereby submit responses of the Company to comments received from the Staff
in a letter from H. Christopher Owings, dated October 23, 2007 (the “Comment Letter”). In
addition, we have reflected the changes noted below in Amendment No. 7 (the “Amendment”) to
the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (the “Registration Statement”), including
certain exhibits. A courtesy copy of this letter is being submitted to the Staff by hand delivery.

    1.

    We note your response to comment 2 in our letter dated October 19, 2007. We further note
that your disclosure of the name of the natural person(s), public entities, majority-owned
subsidiaries of public entities or registered investment companies who have investment and/or
voting control over the respective selling stockholders is incomplete or unclear as indicated
below;

    •

    You have provided no beneficial ownership information as to Feigin Trading Co.

    Response: In response to the Staff’s comment, we have deleted Feigin Trading
Co. from the “Selling stockholder” table. See page 101.

    •

    Footnote (2) to the Selling Stockholder table appears to refer to the beneficial
ownership of one “entity,” however, this footnote has been attributed to several
selling stockholders; and

October 24, 2007

Page 2

    Response: In response to the Staff’s comment, we have revised footnote 2 to
clarify that the footnote applies to more than one entity. Please see page 101.

    •

    With respect to Bank of America Ventures (footnote 4), Bank of America Capital
Corporation (footnote 4), Jewish Communal Fund (footnote 13), JP Morgan Chase Bank
(footnote 14) and Appomattox Foundation (footnote 16), your disclosures are incomplete
in that they do not identify the beneficial owners of the respective shares. We note
your indication that “no one person acting alone has investment and voting power as to
these shares,” however, the fact does not avail you of the requirement that you
disclose the persons with beneficial ownership of such shares.

    Response: In response to the Staff’s comment, we have amended footnotes 4 and
13 to include the information requested. Please see pages 101 — 102. In addition, we
advise the Staff that we are using best efforts to obtain the information requested as
to footnotes 14 and 16. We intend to file an amendment to the Registration Statement as
soon as possible after receiving the remaining information.

    2.

    We note that you have submitted a requested effectiveness for 4:00 p.m. on October 24, 2007.
In connection with your request you have provide certain representations and we note that in
the third representation that you indicate that you will not assert our declaring you
effective as a defense. Your third representation should also represent that you may not
assert staff comments as a defense. Please revise your request accordingly.

    Response: In response to the Staff’s comment, we have revised the acceleration
request, as indicated, and have resubmitted the request.

     If you have any questions regarding the foregoing responses or the enclosed Amendment or need
additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at (312) 876-7680 or Seth Diehl at
(312) 876-7634.

    Very truly yours,

    /s/ Christopher D. Lueking

    Christopher D. Lueking

    of LATHAM & WATKINS LLP

Enclosures

    cc:

    Gregg R. Bodnar

    Robert Guttman, Esq.

    Seth Diehl