SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Probe Scores Topics IPO Watchlist Monthly Activity About API

SEC Comment Letter for Cocrystal Pharma, Inc. (COCP) (CIK 0001412486) (COCP) — Sep 21, 2012

Cocrystal Pharma, Inc. (COCP) (CIK 0001412486)
Date: Sept. 21, 2012 · CIK: 0001412486 · Accession: 0000000000-12-051817

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

Sentiment
Urgency
Document Type
Confidence
SEC Posture
Company Posture

Summary

Reasoning

File numbers found in text: 333-146182

Date
September 21, 2012
Author
/s/ Jim B. Rosenberg
Form
UPLOAD
Company
Cocrystal Pharma, Inc. (COCP) (CIK 0001412486)

Letter

September 21, 2012 Via E -mail Mr. Elliot Maza Chief Executive Officer Biozone Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 550 Sylvan Avenue Suite 101 Englewood Cliffs, NJ 07632

Re: Biozone Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Amendment to Form 10 -Q for the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2012 Filed August 17 , 2012 File No. 333-146182

Dear Mr. Maza :

We have limited our review of your filing to the issues we have addressed in our comments. In our comments , we ask you to provide us with information so we may better understand your disclosure.

Please respond to this letter within 10 business days by providing the requested information or by advising us when you will provide the requested response . If you do not believe a comment applies to your facts and circumstances, please tell us why in your response. Please furnish us a letter on EDGAR under the form type label CORRESP that key s your responses to our comments.

After reviewing the information you provide in response to these comments , we may have additional comments and/or request that you amend your filing .

1. You restated your financial statements to record a beneficial conversion feature of $5,750,000. This amount appears to exceed the proc eeds allocated to the OPKO n otes at issuance. ASC 470 -20-30-8 states that if the intrinsic value of the beneficial conversion feature is greater than the proceeds allocated to the convertible instrument, the amount of the discount assigned to the benefici al conversion feature shall be limited to the amount of the proceeds allocated to the convertible instrument. In addition, it appears you recorded the beneficial conversion feature to interest expense rather than accreting over the term of the OPKO notes as ASC 470 -20-35-7 would appear to suggest. Please provide us your analysis demonstrating how your accounting complies with GAAP including how you comply with ASC 470 -20-25-2, ASC 470-20-30-8 and ASC 470-20-35-7. In your analysis include how you dete rmined the amount of the beneficial conversion feature recorded , your allocation of the proceeds to t he OPKO notes and warrants and the journal entries made to record the beneficial conversion and allocation.

Mr. Elliot Maza Biozone Pharmaceuticals, Inc. September 2 1, 2012 Page 2

2. In addition, you disclose that you recorded the warrants at fair value using the Black -Scholes method . Your warrant agreement in Exhibit 10.3 of the Form 8 -K filed on March 1, 2012 appears to include adjustments to the exercise price in Section 2b which appear to be a down - round provision . Please explain to us how you considered this down -round protection provision in determining the fair value of these warrants. In this regard, it appears that a binomial or simulation model would be appropriate to consider the potential adjustment to the exercise price while a single -path option pricing model, such as the Black -Scholes model, cannot properly consider such adjustments.

We urge all persons who are responsible for the accuracy and a dequacy of the disclosure in this filing to be certain that the filing include s the information the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and all applicable Exchange Act rules require. Since the company and its management are in possession of all facts relating to a company’s disclosure, they are responsible for the ac curacy and adequacy of the disclosures they have made.

In responding to our comments, please provide a written statement from the company acknowledging that:  the company is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in the filing;  staff comments or changes to disclosure in response to staff comments do not foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to this filing; and  the company may not assert staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of the United States.

You may c ontact Dana Hartz, Staff Accountant, at (202) 551 -3648 or Mary Mast, Senior Staff Accountant, at (202) 551 -3613 if you have questions regarding these comments. In this regard, do not hesitate to contact me at (202) 551 -3679.

Sincerely,
/s/ Jim B. Rosenberg

Show Raw Text
September 21, 2012

Via E -mail
Mr. Elliot Maza
Chief Executive Officer
Biozone Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
550 Sylvan Avenue
Suite 101
Englewood Cliffs, NJ 07632

Re: Biozone  Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Amendment to Form 10 -Q for the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2012
Filed August 17 , 2012
  File No. 333-146182

Dear Mr. Maza :

We have limited our review of your filing to the issues we have addressed in our
comments.  In  our comments , we ask you to provide us with information so we may better
understand your disclosure.

Please respond to this letter within 10 business days by providing the requested
information or by advising us when you will provide the requested response .  If you  do not
believe a comment applies to your facts and circumstances, please tell us why in your response.
Please furnish us a letter on EDGAR under the form type label CORRESP that key s your
responses to our comments.

After reviewing the information you provide in response to these comments , we may
have  additional comments  and/or request that you amend your filing .

1. You restated your financial statements to record a beneficial conversion feature of
$5,750,000.  This amount appears to exceed the proc eeds allocated to the OPKO n otes at
issuance.  ASC 470 -20-30-8 states that  if the intrinsic value of the beneficial conversion
feature is greater than the proceeds allocated to the convertible instrument,  the amount of the
discount assigned to the benefici al conversion feature shall be limited to the amount of the
proceeds allocated to the convertible instrument.   In addition, it appears you recorded the
beneficial conversion feature to interest expense rather than accreting over the term of the
OPKO notes  as ASC 470 -20-35-7 would appear to suggest.  Please provide us your analysis
demonstrating how your accounting complies with  GAAP including how you comply with
ASC 470 -20-25-2, ASC  470-20-30-8 and ASC 470-20-35-7.  In your analysis include how
you dete rmined the amount of the beneficial conversion feature recorded , your allocation of
the proceeds to t he OPKO notes and warrants  and the journal entries made to record the
beneficial conversion and allocation.

Mr. Elliot Maza
Biozone Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
September 2 1, 2012
Page 2

 2. In addition, you disclose that you recorded the warrants at fair value using the Black -Scholes
method .  Your warrant agreement in Exhibit 10.3 of the Form 8 -K filed on March 1, 2012
appears to include adjustments to the exercise price  in Section 2b which appear to be a down -
round provision .  Please explain to us how you considered this down -round protection
provision in determining the fair value of these warrants.  In this regard, it appears that a
binomial or simulation model would be appropriate to consider the potential adjustment to
the exercise price while a single -path option pricing model, such as the Black -Scholes model,
cannot properly consider such adjustments.

We urge all persons who are responsible for the accuracy and a dequacy of the disclosure
in this  filing to be certain that  the filing include s the information the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and all applicable Exchange Act rules require.   Since the company and its management are
in possession of all facts relating to a company’s disclosure, they are responsible for the ac curacy
and adequacy of the disclosures they have made.

In responding to our comments, please provide  a written statement from the company
acknowledging that:
 the company is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in the
filing;
 staff comments or changes to disclosure in response to staff comments do not
foreclose the Commission from taking any  action with respect to this  filing; and
 the company may not assert staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated
by the Commission or  any person under the federal securities laws of the United
States.

You may c ontact Dana Hartz, Staff Accountant, at (202) 551 -3648 or Mary Mast, Senior
Staff Accountant, at (202) 551 -3613 if you have questions regarding these comments.  In this
regard, do not hesitate to contact me at (202) 551 -3679.

Sincerely,

 /s/ Jim B. Rosenberg

Jim B. Rosenberg
Senior Assistant Chief Accountant