SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Probe Scores Topics IPO Watchlist Monthly Activity About API

SEC Company Response from Tonix Pharmaceuticals Holding Corp. (TNXP) (CIK 0001430306) (TNXP) — Sep 6, 2019

Tonix Pharmaceuticals Holding Corp. (TNXP) (CIK 0001430306)
Date: Sept. 6, 2019 · CIK: 0001430306 · Accession: 0001387131-19-006792

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

Sentiment
Urgency
Document Type
Confidence
SEC Posture
Company Posture

Summary

Reasoning

File numbers found in text: 333-233445

Date
September 6, 2019
Author
/s/Alan Wovsaniker
Form
CORRESP
Company
Tonix Pharmaceuticals Holding Corp. (TNXP) (CIK 0001430306)

Letter

VIA EDGAR TRANSMISSION Division of Corporation Finance Registration Statement on Form S-1 Filed August 23, 2019 File No. 333-233445

RE: Tonix Pharmaceuticals Holding Corp.

Dear Ms. Aldave:

I am writing on behalf of Tonix Pharmaceuticals Holding Corp. (the “Company”), in response to the letter from the Staff of the Division of Corporation Finance (the “Staff”), of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, dated September 4, 2019 (the “Comment Letter”) relating to the above-referenced Registration Statement on Form S-1 (the “Registration Statement”). Set forth below is the Company’s response to the comment raised in the Comment Letter. For the convenience of the Staff, the comment in the Comment Letter is reprinted in bold and is followed by the Company’s response.

Concurrently with this letter, the Company is filing Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement (“Amendment No. 1”) which reflects revisions made to the Registration Statement in response to the comments of the Staff. Unless otherwise noted, the page numbers in the bold headings and the responses below refer to pages in the Registration Statement. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the meaning given to such terms in the Registration Statement.

Tonya K. Aldave

September 6, 2019

Page 2

Registration Statement on Form S-1

Description of Securities, page 22

1. We note that your forum selection provision identifies the Eighth Judicial District Court of Clark County, Nevada as the exclusive forum for certain litigation, including any “derivative action.” Please describe this provision and disclose whether this provision applies to actions arising under the Securities Act or Exchange Act. In that regard, we note that Section 27 of the Exchange Act creates exclusive federal jurisdiction over all suits brought to enforce any duty or liability created by the Exchange Act or the rules and regulations thereunder, and Section 22 of the Securities Act creates concurrent jurisdiction for federal and state courts over all suits brought to enforce any duty or liability created by the Securities Act or the rules and regulations thereunder. If the provision applies to Securities Act claims, please also revise your prospectus to state that there is uncertainty as to whether a court would enforce such provision and that investors cannot waive compliance with the federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder. If this provision does not apply to actions arising under the Securities Act or Exchange Act, please also tell us how you will inform investors in future filings that the provision does not apply to any actions arising under the Securities Act or Exchange Act.

Response: The Company respectfully advises the Staff that the Company’s forum selection provision provides that the Eighth Judicial District Court of Clark County, Nevada has exclusive jurisdiction over only certain matters to the “fullest extent permitted by law”. Accordingly, this provision is not intended to apply to claims arising under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, for which federal and state courts have concurrent jurisdiction, and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, for which federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction. In response to the Staff’s comment, the Company has revised its disclosure on page 24 of Amendment No. to clarify the intent of the Company’s forum selection provision. The Company has also added a risk factor on page 10 of the Registration Statement describing the Company’s forum selection provision and its intent. The Company will also include similar disclosure in its risk factors in its Annual Report on Form 10-K and in future registration statements, as applicable.

Should the Staff have additional questions or comments regarding the foregoing or Amendment No. 1, please contact me at 973-597-2564.

Very truly yours,
By:
/s/Alan Wovsaniker

Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm

September 6, 2019

VIA EDGAR TRANSMISSION

Tonya K. Aldave

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Division of Corporation Finance

Washington, D.C. 20549

    RE:
    Tonix Pharmaceuticals Holding Corp.

    Registration Statement on Form S-1

    Filed August 23, 2019

    File No. 333-233445

Dear Ms. Aldave:

I
am writing on behalf of Tonix Pharmaceuticals Holding Corp. (the “Company”), in response to the letter from
the Staff of the Division of Corporation Finance (the “Staff”), of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission,
dated September 4, 2019 (the “Comment Letter”) relating to the above-referenced Registration Statement on Form
S-1 (the “Registration Statement”). Set forth below is the Company’s response to the comment raised in
the Comment Letter. For the convenience of the Staff, the comment in the Comment Letter is reprinted in bold and is followed by
the Company’s response.

Concurrently
with this letter, the Company is filing Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement (“Amendment No. 1”) which
reflects revisions made to the Registration Statement in response to the comments of the Staff. Unless otherwise noted, the page
numbers in the bold headings and the responses below refer to pages in the Registration Statement. Capitalized terms used but
not defined herein have the meaning given to such terms in the Registration Statement.

Tonya K. Aldave

September 6, 2019

Page 2

Registration
Statement on Form S-1

Description
of Securities, page 22

 1. We note
                                         that your forum selection provision identifies the Eighth Judicial District Court of
                                         Clark County, Nevada as the exclusive forum for certain litigation, including any “derivative
                                         action.” Please describe this provision and disclose whether this provision applies
                                         to actions arising under the Securities Act or Exchange Act. In that regard, we
                                         note that Section 27 of the Exchange Act creates exclusive federal jurisdiction over
                                         all suits brought to enforce any duty or liability created by the Exchange Act or the
                                         rules and regulations thereunder, and Section 22 of the Securities Act creates concurrent
                                         jurisdiction for federal and state courts over all suits brought to enforce any duty
                                         or liability created by the Securities Act or the rules and regulations thereunder. If
                                         the provision applies to Securities Act claims, please also revise your prospectus to
                                         state that there is uncertainty as to whether a court would enforce such provision and
                                         that investors cannot waive compliance with the federal securities laws and the rules
                                         and regulations thereunder. If this provision does not apply to actions arising under
                                         the Securities Act or Exchange Act, please also tell us how you will inform investors
                                         in future filings that the provision does not apply to any actions arising under the
                                         Securities Act or Exchange Act.

Response:
The Company respectfully advises the Staff that the Company’s forum selection provision provides that the Eighth Judicial
District Court of Clark County, Nevada has exclusive jurisdiction over only certain matters to the “fullest extent permitted
by law”. Accordingly, this provision is not intended to apply to claims arising under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,
for which federal and state courts have concurrent jurisdiction, and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, for which
federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction. In response to the Staff’s comment, the Company has revised its disclosure on
page 24 of Amendment No. to clarify the intent of the Company’s forum selection provision. The Company has also added a
risk factor on page 10 of the Registration Statement describing the Company’s forum selection provision and its intent.
The Company will also include similar disclosure in its risk factors in its Annual Report on Form 10-K and in future registration
statements, as applicable.

Should
the Staff have additional questions or comments regarding the foregoing or Amendment No. 1, please contact me at 973-597-2564.

    Very truly yours,

    By:
    /s/Alan Wovsaniker

    Alan Wovsaniker

 cc: Seth Lederman

                                         Tonix Pharmaceuticals Holding Corp.