SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Probe Scores Topics IPO Watchlist Monthly Activity About API

SEC Comment Letter for Mistras Group, Inc. (MG) (CIK 0001436126) (MG) — Feb 18, 2011

Mistras Group, Inc. (MG) (CIK 0001436126)
Date: Feb. 18, 2011 · CIK: 0001436126 · Accession: 0000000000-11-011017

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

Sentiment
Urgency
Document Type
Confidence
SEC Posture
Company Posture

Summary

Reasoning

Referenced dates: January 28, 2011

Date
February 18, 2011
Author
Jay Ingram Legal Branch Chief
Form
UPLOAD
Company
Mistras Group, Inc. (MG) (CIK 0001436126)

Letter

February 18, 2011 Mr. Sotirios J. Vahaviolos Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President Mistras Group, Inc. 195 Clarksville Road Princeton Junction, NJ 08550 Re: Mistras Group, Inc. Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended May 31, 2010 Filed August 17, 2010 Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A Filed September 16, 2010

Dear Mr. Vahaviolos: We have reviewed your response letter date d February 11, 2011 and have the following additional comments. If you disagree, we will cons ider your explanation as to why our comment is inapplicable. In some of our comments, we may ask you to provide us with supplemental information so we may better understand your disclosure. Form 10-K for the Year Ended May 31, 2010

Business, page 3

General

1. We note your response to comment two in our letter dated January 28, 2011. Please confirm that you will provide disclosure rega rding the extent to which the business of your segments is seasonal in your Business section in future filings. We note that the revised disclosure you have included in your response is included within the Risk Factors. See Item 101(c)(v) of Regulation S-K. Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A

Compensation Discussion and Analysis, page 16

Annual Cash Incentives, page 17

2. We note your response to comment 15 in our letter dated January 28, 2011, however, given your disclosure on page 17 stating that each executive officer had the potential to earn cash incentives based upon a percentage of his or her base salary, and the cash

Mr. Sotirios J. Vahaviolos Mistras Group, Inc. February 18, 2011 Page 2

incentives were principally based on pre-dete rmined performance targets for revenue and adjusted EBITDA, we are not able to concur with your view that you did not have an incentive plan as that term is defined in Item 402(a)(6)(iii) of Regulation S-K. We recognize that because you did not meet such targets, the bonuses ultimately paid to your named executive officers were discretionary. However, despite the fact that the applicable performance targets were not me t, Item 402(d)(2)(iii) requires that the potential payments that could have been made pursuant under your annual cash incentive plan be disclosed in the Grants of Plan-Bas ed Awards table. Please confirm that in your future filings you will provide the requisite disclosure in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards table for any such incentive plan, or advise us as to why you believe such disclosure was not required.

As appropriate, please respond to these comments within 10 business days or tell us when you will provide us with a response. Please furn ish a letter that keys your responses to our comments and provides any requested supplemen tal information. Detailed response letters greatly facilitate our review. Please file your re sponse letter on EDGAR. Please understand that we may have additional comments after re viewing your responses to our comments. You may contact Erin Jaskot, Staff Attorney, at (202) 551- 3442, or me at (202) 551-3397 with any questions.

Sincerely,
Jay Ingram Legal Branch Chief

Show Raw Text
February 18, 2011

Mr. Sotirios J. Vahaviolos Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President Mistras Group, Inc. 195 Clarksville Road Princeton Junction, NJ 08550
Re: Mistras Group, Inc.
 Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended May 31, 2010
Filed August 17, 2010  Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A Filed September 16, 2010

Dear Mr. Vahaviolos:
 We have reviewed your response letter date d February 11, 2011 and have the following
additional comments. If you disagree, we will cons ider your explanation as to why our comment
is inapplicable. In some of our comments, we  may ask you to provide us with supplemental
information so we may better understand your disclosure.              Form 10-K for the Year Ended May 31, 2010

Business, page 3

General

1. We note your response to comment two in our letter dated January 28, 2011.  Please
confirm that you will provide disclosure rega rding the extent to which the business of
your segments is seasonal in your Business section in future filings.  We note that the revised disclosure you have included in your  response is included within the Risk
Factors.  See
 Item 101(c)(v) of Regulation S-K.
 Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A

 Compensation Discussion and Analysis, page 16

 Annual Cash Incentives, page 17

2. We note your response to comment 15 in our  letter dated January 28, 2011,  however,
given your disclosure on page 17 stating that each executive officer had the potential to
earn cash incentives based upon a percentage of  his or her base salary, and the cash

Mr. Sotirios J. Vahaviolos Mistras Group, Inc.
  February 18, 2011   Page 2

incentives were principally based on pre-dete rmined performance targets for revenue and
adjusted EBITDA, we are not able to concur  with your view that you did not have an
incentive plan as that term is defined in Item 402(a)(6)(iii) of Regulation S-K.  We
recognize that because you did not meet such targets, the bonuses ultimately paid to your named executive officers were discretionary.  However, despite the fact that the
applicable performance targets were not me t, Item 402(d)(2)(iii) requires that the
potential payments that could have been made pursuant under your annual cash incentive
plan be disclosed in the Grants of Plan-Bas ed Awards table.  Please confirm that in your
future filings you will provide the requisite disclosure in the Grants of Plan-Based
Awards table for any such incentive plan, or  advise us as to why you believe such
disclosure was not required.

As appropriate, please respond to these comments  within 10 business days or tell us when
you will provide us with a response. Please furn ish a letter that keys your responses to our
comments and provides any requested supplemen tal information. Detailed response letters
greatly facilitate our review. Please file your re sponse letter on EDGAR. Please understand that
we may have additional comments after re viewing your responses to our comments.
 You may contact Erin Jaskot, Staff Attorney, at (202) 551- 3442, or me at (202) 551-3397
with any questions.

Sincerely,

  Jay Ingram Legal Branch Chief