SEC Company Response from TANDEM DIABETES CARE INC (TNDM) (CIK 0001438133) (TNDM) — Oct 24, 2013
TANDEM DIABETES CARE INC (TNDM) (CIK 0001438133)
Date: Oct. 24, 2013 · CIK: 0001438133 · Accession: 0001193125-13-410067
AI Filing Summary & Sentiment
File numbers found in text: 333-191601
Referenced dates: September 6, 2013
Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm
Lawyer's SEC Letter
STRADLING YOCCA CARLSON & RAUTH, P.C.
660 NEWPORT CENTER DRIVE, SUITE 1600
NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660-6422
SYCR.COM
NEWPORT BEACH
RENO
SAN DIEGO
SACRAMENTO
SAN FRANCISCO
SANTA BARBARA
SANTA MONICA
October 24, 2013
VIA EDGAR AND FEDEX
FOIA CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED
BY TANDEM DIABETES CARE, INC.
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Division of Corporation Finance
100 F Street, N.E.
Washington, D.C. 20549
Attention: Mary Beth Breslin, Esq.
Re:
Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc.
Registration Statement on Form S-1
Filed October 7, 2013
File No. 333-191601
Dear
Ms. Breslin:
On behalf of our client, Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), we are
submitting this letter in response to comments received from the staff (the “Staff”) of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) by letter dated September 6, 2013 (the “Comment
Letter”), relating to the Company’s draft registration statement on Form S-1 confidentially submitted to the Commission on August 12, 2013, which was subsequently amended in response to the Comment Letter and confidentially
submitted to the Commission on September 30, 2013 (as so amended, the “Confidential Registration Statement”). The Confidential Registration Statement was filed publicly on October 7, 2013 (File No. 333-191601) (the
“Original Registration Statement”). Concurrent with the submission of this response letter, the Company is filing Amendment No. 1 to the Original Registration Statement (as so amended, the “Registration
Statement”). In this letter, we are only responding to comment number 23 in the Comment Letter, which has been reproduced in its entirety below.
Confidential Treatment Request
Due to
the commercially sensitive nature of information contained herein, the Company hereby requests, pursuant to 17 C.F.R. § 200.83, that certain portions of this letter be maintained in confidence, not be made part of any public record and not be
disclosed to any person, as they contain confidential information. The Company has excluded the confidential portions of this letter from the copy of the letter filed on EDGAR.
1
FOIA Confidential Treatment Requested
By Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc.
Registration Statement
on Form S-1
Filed October 7, 2013
File No.
333-191601
In accordance with 17 C.F.R. § 200.83(d)(1), if any person (including any
governmental employee who is not an employee of the Commission) should request access to or an opportunity to inspect this letter, we request that we be immediately notified of any such request, be furnished with a copy of all written materials
pertaining to such request (including, but not limited to, the request itself) and be given at least ten business days advance notice of any intended release so that the Company may, if deemed necessary or appropriate, pursue any remedies available
to it. In such an event, we respectfully request that you telephone the undersigned rather than rely upon the U.S. mail for such notice. The address and telephone number for the undersigned is c/o Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth, P.C., 660
Newport Center Drive, Suite 1600, Newport Beach, CA 92660, Attention: Ryan C. Wilkins, Esq., telephone number (949) 725-4115.
Staff Comment and
Company Response
Critical Accounting Policies and Management Estimates and Assumptions
Stock Based Compensation, pages 57-61
23.
After pricing information is available, please revise to provide a specific discussion of each significant factor contributing to significant differences between the estimated fair value of your stock and the estimated
IPO price (or pricing range) for the 12 months prior to the IPO. Please note that we are deferring final evaluation of share-based compensation until the estimated offering price is specified, and we may have further comments in that regard when you
file an amendment containing that information.
Company Response: We respectfully advise the Staff that on
October 22, 2013, the Company, based on information provided by its underwriters, determined that the estimated offering prices to be included on the cover of the Company’s preliminary prospectus (the “Cover Page”) is
likely to be in the range of $[***] to $[***] per share. The midpoint of the estimated price range is $[***] per share. The Company anticipates making a final determination of the estimated offering prices to be included on the Cover Page within the
next 7 to 10 days.
In comparison, the Company’s board of directors, with input from management, determined the fair value of the
Company’s common stock to be $4.78 per share as of September 30, 2013. This amount was determined after considering the objective and subjective factors described in the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations” section of the Registration Statement, which included, but was not limited to, consideration of material Company operational and development milestones and a valuation report prepared by an independent
third-party valuation specialist.
Please note that the foregoing per share amounts, and the other per share amounts set forth in this
letter, do not reflect the impact of an anticipated reverse stock split, which the Company plans to effect immediately prior to the closing of the initial public offering.
CERTAIN CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS
DOCUMENT, MARKED BY [***], HAS BEEN OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE
COMMISSION PURSUANT TO 17 C.F.R. §200.83
2
FOIA Confidential Treatment Requested
By Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc.
Registration Statement
on Form S-1
Filed October 7, 2013
File No.
333-191601
As is typical in initial public offerings, the final estimated price range included on the
Cover Page will not be derived using a formal determination of fair value, but instead will be determined primarily through negotiation between the Company and its underwriters. Among the factors that the Company expects to consider in setting the
estimated price range for the offering are the following:
•
an analysis of the typical valuation ranges seen in recent initial public offerings by companies in the Company’s industry, and by companies conducting initial public offerings generally;
•
the recent market prices of, and the demand for, publicly-traded common stock of companies in the Company’s industry, and public companies generally;
•
the general condition of the securities markets;
•
an assumption that there would be a receptive public trading market for medical device companies such as the Company;
•
an assumption that there would be sufficient demand for the Company’s common stock to support an offering of the size contemplated by the Registration Statement; and
•
preliminary discussions with the underwriters concerning the potential valuation of the Company.
The midpoint of the estimated price range for the offering of $[***] per share (the “Midpoint Price”), exceeds the fair
value of the Company’s common stock of $4.78 per share as of September 30, 2013, which was determined as described above (the “Prior Valuation Price”) by $[***] per share. The Company respectfully submits that the
difference between the Prior Valuation Price and the Midpoint Price is primarily attributable to the fact that the methodology for determining the two prices is different in important ways.
The Prior Valuation Price resulted from the consideration of multiple liquidity scenarios (the “early IPO”, “late IPO” and
“non-IPO” (or “stay private”) scenarios), not all of which allocate value to the Company’s stockholders on a fully-diluted, as-converted to common stock basis. In contrast, the Midpoint Price assumes with 100% probability
that the Company will complete the contemplated initial public offering (in connection with which all of the Company’s outstanding preferred stock will be converted into common stock) during the fourth quarter of 2013, as well as certain other
factors.
In particular, in calculating the Prior Valuation Price, the consideration of multiple liquidity scenarios with different
probability weightings, along with the application of a present value discount factor of 24% and a discount for lack of marketability (“DLOM”) (10%, 14% and 25% in the “early IPO”, “late IPO” and
“non-IPO” (or “stay private”) scenarios, respectively)
CERTAIN CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS
DOCUMENT, MARKED BY [***], HAS BEEN OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE
COMMISSION PURSUANT TO 17 C.F.R. §200.83
3
FOIA Confidential Treatment Requested
By Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc.
Registration Statement
on Form S-1
Filed October 7, 2013
File No.
333-191601
accounted for approximately $[***] of the $[***] per share difference between the Prior Valuation Price and the Midpoint Price. The following points illustrate this calculation in greater detail:
•
The September 30, 2013 valuation report prepared by the Company’s valuation specialist contained three liquidity scenarios. The “non-IPO” (or “stay private”) scenario (which, among other
things, facilitated the inclusion of various potential liquidity outcomes in which the Company’s preferred stockholders would retain their rights and preferences upon a liquidation of the Company) resulted in a fair value determination of $2.82
per share prior to applying the DLOM of 25%. The “early-IPO” scenario results in a higher fair value per share determination than the “non-IPO” scenario because, under the “early IPO scenario, the Company’s preferred
stock would convert into common stock in connection with the offering and, therefore, the liquidation preferences associated with the preferred stock would be eliminated upon completion of the offering. Accordingly, after applying the indicated DLOM
and a scenario probability weighting of 30%, the consideration of the “non-IPO” scenario accounted for approximately $[***] per share of the $[***] per share difference between the Prior Valuation Price and the Midpoint Price;
•
In determining the fair value of the Company’s common stock, the September 30, 2013 valuation report utilized a DLOM equal to 10%, 14% and 25% in the “early IPO”, “late IPO” and
“non-IPO” scenarios, respectively. The application of these factors accounted for approximately $[***] per share of the $[***] per share difference between the Prior Valuation Price and the Midpoint Price; and
•
The Guideline Company Method was applied to the “early IPO” and “late IPO” scenarios. A present value discount factor of 24% was applied to each scenario, resulting in a determination of the fair
value of the Company’s common stock of $6.06 per share and $8.89 per share prior to applying a DLOM equal to 10% and 14% for the “early IPO” and “late IPO” scenarios, respectively. Accordingly, after applying the indicated
DLOM and the scenario probability weighting (55% for the “early IPO” scenario and 15% for the “late IPO” scenario, respectively), the consideration of a present value discount factor accounted for approximately $[***] per share
of the $[***] per share difference between the Prior Valuation Price and the Midpoint Price.
The Company believes that the
remaining difference between the Prior Valuation Price and the Midpoint Price is justified by (i) the fact that the valuation report prepared by the Company’s third-party valuation specialist utilized a quantitative methodology to
determine the fair value of the Company’s common stock, which may differ from the more qualitative and subjective methodology that may be used by some public market investors to determine the price they are willing to pay in the offering, and
(ii) other factors, such as the inherent uncertainty of completing a successful initial public offering and the possibility that the actual offering price could be substantially lower than the estimated offering price range provided by the
Company’s underwriters.
CERTAIN CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS
DOCUMENT, MARKED BY [***], HAS BEEN OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE
COMMISSION PURSUANT TO 17 C.F.R. §200.83
4
FOIA Confidential Treatment Requested
By Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc.
Registration Statement
on Form S-1
Filed October 7, 2013
File No.
333-191601
In conclusion, the Company respectfully submits that the difference between the latest
valuation (i.e., the Prior Valuation Price) and the estimated IPO price (i.e., the Midpoint Price) is reasonable in light of the considerations outlined above.
The Company expects to add disclosure to the effect of the foregoing in its next amendment to the Registration Statement, which the Company
expects will include the price range. The Company anticipates filing this amendment in the next 7 to 10 days.
In addition, as requested by
the Staff, the Company confirms that it will continue to update the disclosures in its Registration Statement to reflect all equity-related transactions, including the issuance of any options, warrants, convertible notes or shares of preferred
stock, through the effective date of the Registration Statement.
* * * * *
CERTAIN CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS
DOCUMENT, MARKED BY [***], HAS BEEN OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE
COMMISSION PURSUANT TO 17 C.F.R. §200.83
5
FOIA Confidential Treatment Requested
By Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc.
Registration Statement
on Form S-1
Filed October 7, 2013
File No.
333-191601
Should the Staff have any questions or comments regarding any of the foregoing, please do not
hesitate to contact the undersigned via telephone at (949) 725-4115 or via email at rwilkins@sycr.com, or in his absence, Bruce Feuchter via telephone at (949) 725-4123 or via email at feuchter@sycr.com.
Sincerely,
STRADLING YOCCA CARLSON & RAUTH, P.C.
/s/ Ryan C. Wilkins
Ryan C. Wilkins
cc:
Tandem Diabetes
Care, Inc.
Kim D. Blickenstaff, Chief Executive Officer
John Cajigas, Chief Financial Officer
David B. Berger, Esq.,
General Counsel
Clifford Chance US LLP
Alejandro E.
Camacho, Esq.
Per B. Chilstrom, Esq.
Stradling Yocca
Carlson & Rauth, P.C.
Bruce Feuchter, Esq.
Timothy F. O’Brien, Esq.
6