SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Probe Scores Topics IPO Watchlist Monthly Activity About API

SEC Company Response from Antelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd (AEHL) (CIK 0001470683) (AEHL) — Sep 23, 2015

Antelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd (AEHL) (CIK 0001470683)
Date: Sept. 23, 2015 · CIK: 0001470683 · Accession: 0001144204-15-056151

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

Sentiment
Urgency
Document Type
Confidence
SEC Posture
Company Posture

Summary

Reasoning

File numbers found in text: 333-206516

Referenced dates: September 17, 2015

Date
September 23, 2015
Author
Ralph V. De Martino
Form
CORRESP
Company
Antelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd (AEHL) (CIK 0001470683)

Letter

Division of Corporation Finance United States Securities and Exchange Commission Re: China Ceramics Co., Ltd. Registration Statement on Form F-3 Filed August 21, 2015 File No. 333-206516 (the “F-3 Filing”)

Dear Mr. Ingram:

On behalf of China Ceramics Co., Ltd. (the “Company”), we are writing in response to the comments of the staff of the Commission (the “Staff”) on the F-3 Filing as transmitted by a letter dated September 17, 2015 (the “Comment Letter”) to Edmund Hen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company. The answers set forth herein refer to each of the Staff’s comments by number. This letter sets forth the Company’s proposed disclosures and responses to the Comment Letter. For your convenience, we have restated the comments from the Comment Letter below, followed by the Company’s responses. An amended filing to the F-3 Filing (the “Amended F-3 Filing”) reflecting changes in response to your comments is being filed today via the Commission’s EDGAR system.

Exhibit 5.1

1. The opinion appears to qualify counsel’s expertise to the laws of the British Virgin Islands. Please note that an opinion of counsel with respect to a jurisdiction in which counsel is not admitted to practice is acceptable so long as the opinion is not qualified as to jurisdiction. Please file a new legality opinion (i) from counsel that is admitted to practice in the states of the laws governing the Indentures and warrant agreement or (ii) that does not include inappropriate qualifications pertaining to counsel’s expertise. See Section II.B.3.b. of Staff Legal Bulletin No.19.

Response: A copy of the revised Exhibit 5.1 legal opinion addressing the above comment is filed as an exhibit to the Amended F-3 Filing. In addition, this firm filed a separate legal opinion (Exhibit 5.2) that addresses the comment above.

**************

September 23, 2015

Page 2

Please feel free to contact the undersigned at 202-724-6848 with any questions.

Very truly yours,
/s/
Ralph V. De Martino

Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm

        Schiff Hardin LLP

        901 K Street N.W.

        Suite 700

        Washington, DC 20001

        T 202.778.6400

        F 202.778.6460

    schiffhardin.com

        Ralph V. De Martino

        202.724.6848

        rdemartino@schiffhardin.com

September 23, 2015

VIA SEC EDGAR

Division of Corporation
Finance

United States Securities
and Exchange Commission

100 F Street, N.E.

Washington, D.C. 20549

    Attn:
    Jay Ingram, Legal Branch Chief

    Asia Timmons-Pierce, Staff Attorney

    Re:
    China Ceramics Co., Ltd.

    Registration Statement on Form F-3

    Filed August 21, 2015

    File No. 333-206516 (the “F-3 Filing”)

Dear Mr. Ingram:

On behalf of China
Ceramics Co., Ltd. (the “Company”), we are writing in response to the comments of the staff of the Commission (the
“Staff”) on the F-3 Filing as transmitted by a letter dated September 17, 2015 (the “Comment Letter”) to
Edmund Hen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company. The answers set forth herein refer to each of the Staff’s comments by
number. This letter sets forth the Company’s proposed disclosures and responses to the Comment Letter. For your convenience,
we have restated the comments from the Comment Letter below, followed by the Company’s responses. An amended filing to the
F-3 Filing (the “Amended F-3 Filing”) reflecting changes in response to your comments is being filed today via the
Commission’s EDGAR system.

Exhibit 5.1

1.	The opinion
appears to qualify counsel’s expertise to the laws of the British Virgin Islands. Please note that an opinion of counsel
with respect to a jurisdiction in which counsel is not admitted to practice is acceptable so long as the opinion is not qualified
as to jurisdiction. Please file a new legality opinion (i) from counsel that is admitted to practice in the states of the laws
governing the Indentures and warrant agreement or (ii) that does not include inappropriate qualifications pertaining to counsel’s
expertise. See Section II.B.3.b. of Staff Legal Bulletin No.19.

Response:	A
copy of the revised Exhibit 5.1 legal opinion addressing the above comment is filed as an exhibit to the Amended F-3 Filing. In
addition, this firm filed a separate legal opinion (Exhibit 5.2) that addresses the comment above.

**************

September 23, 2015

Page 2

Please feel free to
contact the undersigned at 202-724-6848 with any questions.

    Very truly yours,

    /s/
    Ralph V. De Martino

    Ralph V. De Martino

    Cc:
    Edmund Hen, CFO

    Alec Orudjev, Esq., Schiff Hardin LLP