SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Probe Scores Topics IPO Watchlist Monthly Activity About API

SEC Company Response from New Mountain Finance Corp (NMFC, NMFCZ) (CIK 0001496099) (NMFC) — Sep 4, 2014

New Mountain Finance Corp (NMFC, NMFCZ) (CIK 0001496099)
Date: Sept. 4, 2014 · CIK: 0001496099 · Accession: 0001104659-14-064688

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

File numbers found in text: 333-168280

Referenced dates: September 2, 2014

Date
September 4, 2014
Author
/s/ Steven B. Boehm
Form
CORRESP
Company
New Mountain Finance Corp (NMFC, NMFCZ) (CIK 0001496099)

Letter

Re:

September 4, 2014

VIA EDGAR

David Joire, Esq.

Senior Counsel, Division of Investment Management

U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street, N.E.

Washington, D.C. 20549-4720

New Mountain Finance Corporation, et. al., 812-14279

On behalf of New Mountain Finance Corporation and the additional applicants (the “Applicants “), please find a copy of the above-referenced Second Amended and Restated Application for an Order under Section 6(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), for an exemption from Sections 18(a) and 61(a) of the 1940 Act (the “Amended and Restated Application”), which is marked to indicate changes made to the Application that was filed on June 25, 2014.

The Amended and Restated Application reflects changes made in response to the comments in your letter dated September 2, 2014 (the “Letter”), which sets forth the comments provided by the staff of the Division of Investment Management (the “Staff”) of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”). The comments from the Letter are set forth below and each is followed by the Company’s response.

Terms used but not defined herein have the meaning ascribed to them in the Amended and Restated Application.

1. On page 4, in the first sentence in the second paragraph, you state that New Mountain Finance SBIC submitted an application to the SBA for a license to operate as an SBIC on January 29, 2014. On August 6, 2014, the Company filed a Form 8-K that states that on August 1, 2014, New Mountain Finance SBIC received approval for a license from the SBA to operate as a SBIC. Please add this information to this paragraph.

Response: Applicants have revised the Amended and Restated Application in response to the Staff’s comment.

2. On page 4, you state that the Company is the sole member of the General Partner and the sole limited partner of New Mountain Finance SBIC by the

ATLANTA

AUSTIN

HOUSTON

NEW YORK

SACRAMENTO

WASHINGTON DC

Company. Please add a statement that the Company, directly or indirectly through the General Partner, wholly owns New Mountain Finance SBIC.

Response: Applicants have revised the Amended and Restated Application in response to the Staff’s comment.

3. On page 8, in footnote 4, please include citations to more recent precedent, e.g., In the Matter of Stellus Capital Investment Corporation, Investment Company Act Release Nos. 31160 (July 17, 2014) (notice) and 31206 (Aug. 12, 2014) (order).

Response: Applicants have revised the Amended and Restated Application in response to the Staff’s comment.

4. On page 8, in the last sentence under the caption “Conditions of Exemptive Order,” please insert the language in bold, below. This language apparently was inadvertently dropped from the condition.

In determining whether the Company, New Mountain SBIC and any other SBIC Subsidiary on a consolidated basis have the asset coverage required by Section 18(a) (as modified by Section 61 (a)), any senior securities representing indebtedness ofNew Mountain SBIC or another SBIC Subsidiary if that SBIC Subsidiary has issued indebtedness that is held or guaranteed by the SBA shall not be considered senior securities and, for purposes of the definition of “asset coverage” in Section 18(h), shall be treated as indebtedness not represented by senior securities.

Response: Applicants have revised the Amended and Restated Application in response to the Staff’s comment.

* * * * *

Please call me at (202) 383-0176 if you have any questions or wish to discuss our responses.

Sincerely,
/s/ Steven B. Boehm

Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm

September 4, 2014

VIA EDGAR

David Joire, Esq.

Senior Counsel, Division of Investment Management

U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street, N.E.

Washington, D.C. 20549-4720

Re:

New   Mountain Finance Corporation, et. al., 812-14279

On behalf of New Mountain Finance Corporation and the additional applicants (the “Applicants “), please find a copy of the above-referenced Second Amended and Restated Application for an Order under Section 6(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), for an exemption from Sections 18(a) and 61(a) of the 1940 Act (the “Amended and Restated Application”), which is marked to indicate changes made to the Application that was filed on June 25, 2014.

The Amended and Restated Application reflects changes made in response to the comments in your letter dated September 2, 2014 (the “Letter”), which sets forth the comments provided by the staff of the Division of Investment Management (the “Staff”) of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”). The comments from the Letter are set forth below and each is followed by the Company’s response.

Terms used but not defined herein have the meaning ascribed to them in the Amended and Restated Application.

1.                                      On page 4, in the first sentence in the second paragraph, you state that New Mountain Finance SBIC submitted an application to the SBA for a license to operate as an SBIC on January 29, 2014.  On August 6, 2014, the Company filed a Form 8-K that states that on August 1, 2014, New Mountain Finance SBIC received approval for a license from the SBA to operate as a SBIC.  Please add this information to this paragraph.

Response:                                        Applicants have revised the Amended and Restated Application in response to the Staff’s comment.

2.                                      On page 4, you state that the Company is the sole member of the General Partner and the sole limited partner of New Mountain Finance SBIC by the

ATLANTA

AUSTIN

HOUSTON

NEW YORK

SACRAMENTO

WASHINGTON DC

Company. Please add a statement that the Company, directly or indirectly through the General Partner, wholly owns New Mountain Finance SBIC.

Response:                                        Applicants have revised the Amended and Restated Application in response to the Staff’s comment.

3.                                      On page 8, in footnote 4, please include citations to more recent precedent, e.g., In the Matter of Stellus Capital Investment Corporation, Investment Company Act Release Nos. 31160 (July 17, 2014) (notice) and 31206 (Aug. 12, 2014) (order).

Response:                                        Applicants have revised the Amended and Restated Application in response to the Staff’s comment.

4.                                      On page 8, in the last sentence under the caption “Conditions of Exemptive Order,” please insert the language in bold, below.  This language apparently was inadvertently dropped from the condition.

In determining whether the Company, New Mountain SBIC and any other SBIC Subsidiary on a consolidated basis have the asset coverage required by Section 18(a) (as modified by Section 61 (a)), any senior securities representing indebtedness ofNew Mountain SBIC or another SBIC Subsidiary if that SBIC Subsidiary has issued indebtedness that is held or guaranteed by the SBA shall not be considered senior securities and, for purposes of the definition of “asset coverage” in Section 18(h), shall be treated as indebtedness not represented by senior securities.

Response:                                        Applicants have revised the Amended and Restated Application in response to the Staff’s comment.

*                                         *                                         *                                         *                                         *

2

Please call me at (202) 383-0176 if you have any questions or wish to discuss our responses.

Sincerely,

/s/ Steven B. Boehm

Steven B. Boehm

cc:                                Jim Curtis, Branch Chief

Robert A. Hamwee, New Mountain Finance Corporation

Cynthia M. Krus, Esq., Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP

3

File No. 812-14279

U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FIRSTSECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER PURSUANT TO SECTION 6(c) OF THE INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 1940 (“1940 ACT”) GRANTING EXEMPTIONS FROM SECTIONS 18(a) AND 61(a) OF THE 1940 ACT

NEW MOUNTAIN FINANCE CORPORATION

NEW MOUNTAIN FINANCE ADVISERS BDC, L.L.C.

NEW MOUNTAIN FINANCE SBIC, L.P.

AND

NEW MOUNTAIN FINANCE SBIC G.P., L.L.C.

787 SEVENTH AVENUE, 48TH FLOOR

NEW YORK, NY 10019

(212) 720-0300

All Communications, Notices and Orders to:

Robert A. Hamwee

President and Chief Executive Officer

New Mountain Finance Corporation

787 Seventh Avenue, 48th Floor

New York, NY 10019

(212) 720-0300

Copies to:

Steven B. Boehm, Esq.

Cynthia M. Krus, Esq.

Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP

700 Sixth Street, NW

Washington, DC 20001

(202) 383-0100

June 25September 4, 2014

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Before the

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

In the Matter of:

)

FIRSTSECOND AMENDED AND   RESTATED APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER PURSUANT TO SECTION 6(c) OF THE   INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 1940 (“1940 Act”) GRANTING EXEMPTIONS FROM SECTIONS   18(a) AND 61(a) OF THE 1940 ACT

)

)

NEW   MOUNTAIN FINANCE  CORPORATION

)

NEW   MOUNTAIN FINANCE ADVISERS  BDC, L.L.C.

)

NEW   MOUNTAIN FINANCE SBIC, L.P.

)

And

)

NEW   MOUNTAIN FINANCE SBIC G.P.,  L.L.C.

)

)

)

787   Seventh Avenue, 48th Floor

)

New   York, NY 10019

)

)

)

File   No. 812-14279

)

Investment   Company Act of 1940

)

New Mountain Finance Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), New Mountain Finance Adviser BDC, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company (the “Adviser”), New Mountain Finance SBIC, L.P. (“New Mountain SBIC”) and New Mountain Finance SBIC G.P., L.L.C. (“General Partner”) (collectively the “Applicants”), respectfully request an order (the “Order”) of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”),(1) granting exemptions from Sections 18(a) and 61(a) thereunder.  The relief requested in this application (the “Application”) would permit the Company to adhere to a modified asset coverage requirement under Section 61 of the 1940 Act with respect to any direct or indirect wholly owned subsidiary of the Company that is licensed by the Small Business Administration (“SBA”) to operate under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958 (“SBA Act”) as a small business investment company (“SBIC”) and relies on Section 3(c)(7) for an exemption from the

definition of “investment company” under the 1940 Act (each, an “SBIC Subsidiary” and, collectively, the “SBIC Subsidiaries”).

All existing entities that currently intend to rely on the Order have been named as Applicants, and any other existing or future entities that may rely on the Order in the future would comply with the terms and condition of the Application.

I.                STATEMENT OF FACTS AND BACKGROUND

A.            The Company

The Company, a Delaware corporation organized in June 2010, is an externally managed, closed-end, non-diversified business development company(2) (“BDC”).  On May 19, 2011 the Company a filed Form N-54A with the Commission, electing to be treated as a BDC under the 1940 Act.

The Company is externally managed and advised by the Adviser.  The Company’s principal place of business is 787 7th Avenue, 48th Floor, New York, NY 10019.

As discussed above, and in connection with its IPO, on July 22, 2010 the Company filed a registration statement on Form N-2 (File No. 333-168280) (the “N-2”) and on May 19, 2011 filed a notice under Form N-54A of its election to be regulated as a BDC within the meaning of Section 2(a)(48) of the 1940 Act.  The N-2 was declared effective on May 19, 2011. On May 19, 2011, the Company filed a registration statement on Form 8-A to register its common stock under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).  Accordingly, the Company is subject to the periodic reporting requirements under Section 13(a)

(1)  Unless otherwise indicated, all section references herein are to the 1940 Act.

(2)  Section 2(a)(48) defines a BDC to be any closed-end investment company that operates for the purpose of making investments in securities described in section 55(a)(1) through 55(a)(3) and makes available significant managerial assistance with respect to the issuers of such securities.

of the Exchange Act.  On May 25, 2011, the Company completed its IPO.  The Company’s common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “NMFC.”

The Company’s investment objective is to generate current income and capital appreciation through the sourcing and origination of debt securities at all levels of the capital structure, including first and second lien debt, notes, bonds and mezzanine securities. In some cases, the Company’s investments may also include small equity interests. The primary focus is in the debt of defensive growth companies, which are defined as generally exhibiting the following characteristics: (i) sustainable secular growth drivers, (ii) high barriers to competitive entry, (iii) high free cash flow after capital expenditure and working capital needs, (iv) high returns on assets and (v) niche market dominance.

The Company’s board of directors (the “Board”) consists of seven members, four of whom are not “interested persons” of the Company within the meaning of Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act.

B.            The Adviser

The Adviser serves as the external investment adviser to the Company.  The Adviser was formed in 2010. The Adviser is registered as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940.  The Adviser manages the Company’s investment activities pursuant to an investment advisory agreement with the Company that satisfies the requirements of Sections 15(a) and (c) of the 1940 Act. Subject to the overall supervision of the Board, the Adviser will serve as the investment manager to New Mountain SBIC and the investment and exit decisions and day-to-day investment activities of New Mountain SBIC will be managed by members of the Adviser’s senior management.

C.            General Partner

The General Partner was organized as a limited liability company under the laws of the state of Delaware on January 24, 2014.  The General Partner is the sole general partner of New Mountain SBIC and the Company is the sole member of the General Partner.  The General Partner may serve as the general partner of future SBIC Subsidiaries.

D.            New Mountain SBIC

New Mountain SBIC formally submitted an application to the SBA for a license to operate as an SBIC on January 29, 2014 and the application was accepted for filing on February 18, 2014.  On August 1, 2014, New Mountain SBIC received approval for a license from the SBA to operate as a SBIC.  New Mountain SBIC was organized as a limited partnership under the laws of the state of Delaware on January 24, 2014.

The Company is the sole limited partner of the SBIC.  The Company, directly or indirectly through the General Partner, wholly owns New Mountain SBIC.  New Mountain SBIC is not registered under the 1940 Act as it relies on the exclusion from the definition of investment company contained in Section 3(c)(7) of the 1940 Act.  The Company’s primary focus is on investments in defensive growth companies and industries, as defined above.  New Mountain SBIC will employ the same strategy and philosophy.

Due in part to the increase in the maximum amount of SBIC leverage available to associated(3) SBIC funds, the Company may form a second SBIC Subsidiary to fully utilize maximum available funding. Additionally, if future legislation or SBA regulations increase the current $225 million funding limit for two or more SBICs under common control, it may again be necessary or advisable to establish more than two SBIC Subsidiaries to fully utilize available

(3)  The SBA defines “associate” as “any Person that directly or indirectly Controls, or is Controlled by, or under Common Control with, a licensee.” 13 C.F.R § 120.10 (2013).

funding. Applicants seek for this Order’s exemptive relief to extend to additional SBIC Subsidiaries so that they may rely on the Order in the future without requiring additional exemptive relief. Further, Applicants may seek additional SBIC licenses for future Subsidiaries after the SBIC license of a current SBIC Subsidiary expires. Each SBIC Subsidiary has an initial ten-year life (with provision for the general partner of each SBIC Subsidiary to extend the life of such SBIC Subsidiary for one or more additional years in the event that all of such SBIC Subsidiary’s investments have not been exited by the end of the tenth year). Applicants do not currently anticipate any of the SBIC Subsidiaries operating without SBA funding or guarantees.  The financial statements of all SBIC Subsidiaries will be consolidated with the Company’s financial statements.

As an SBIC, New Mountain SBIC and any other future SBIC Subsidiary, will be examined periodically by the SBA’s staff to determine its compliance with SBIC regulations. In addition, each SBIC Subsidiary will be audited on an annual basis by a third-party accounting firm. SBICs are designed to stimulate the flow of capital to eligible small businesses. Under present SBA regulations, eligible small businesses include businesses that have a tangible net worth not exceeding $18 million and have average net income after federal taxes not exceeding $6 million for the two most recent fiscal years. In addition, an SBIC must devote generally at least 25 percent of its investment activity to “smaller” enterprises as defined by the SBA. A smaller enterprise is one that has a tangible net worth not exceeding $6 million and has average net income after federal taxes not exceeding $2 million for the two most recent fiscal years. SBA regulations also provide alternative size criteria to determine eligibility, which depend on the industry in which the business is engaged and typically include such factors as number of employees or annual receipts. According to SBA regulations, SBICs may make long-term loans

to small businesses or invest in the equity securities of such businesses. In addition to size criteria, SBA regulations also contain other limitations, including limits related to permitted industries, terms of investment, conflicts of interest and co-investments.

II.           REQUESTED RELIEF

A.            Sections 6(c) and 18

1.                                              Section 6(c).  Section 6(c) authorizes the Commission to exempt any person, security, or transaction, or any class or classes of persons, securities, or transactions, from any provision or provisions of the 1940 Act or of any rule or regulation thereunder, if and to the extent that such exemption is necessary or appropriate in the public interest and consistent with the protection of investors and the purposes fairly intended by the policy and provisions of the 1940 Act.

2.                                              Section 18.  Section 18(a) prohibits a registered closed-end investment company from issuing any class of senior security or selling any such security of which it is the issuer, unless it complies with the asset coverage requirements set forth in that section.  “Asset coverage” is defined in Section 18(h) to mean, with respect to a class of senior security representing an indebtedness of an issuer, the ratio that the value of the total assets of an issuer, less all liabilities and indebtedness not represented by senior securities,