SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Probe Scores Topics IPO Watchlist Monthly Activity About API

SEC Company Response from VivoSim Labs, INC. (VIVS) (CIK 0001497253) (VIVS) — May 10, 2012

VivoSim Labs, INC. (VIVS) (CIK 0001497253)
Date: May 10, 2012 · CIK: 0001497253 · Accession: 0001193125-12-226210

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

Sentiment
Urgency
Document Type
Confidence
SEC Posture
Company Posture

Summary

Reasoning

File numbers found in text: 000-54621, 333-169928

Referenced dates: April 18, 2012

Date
May 10, 2012
Author
Jeffrey C. Thacker
Form
CORRESP
Company
VivoSim Labs, INC. (VIVS) (CIK 0001497253)

Letter

SEC Response Letter

DLA Piper LLP (US)

4365 Executive Drive, Suite 1100

San Diego, California 92121-2133

www.dlapiper.com

Jeffrey C. Thacker

jeff.thacker@dlapiper.com

T 858.638.6728

F 858.638.5128

May 10, 2012

Division of Corporation Finance

U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission

100 F Street, NE

Washington, D.C. 20549

Attention:

Mr. Jeffrey Riedler

Ms. Jennifer Riegel

Ms. Keira Ino

Mr. Gustavo Rodriguez

Mr. Michael Rosenthall

Re:

Organovo Holdings, Inc.

Form 8-K/A

Filed March 30, 2012

File No. 333-169928

Ladies and Gentlemen:

This letter responds to the letter of the staff (the “Staff”) of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”), dated April 18, 2012 to Keith Murphy, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President of Organovo Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) regarding the Amendment No. 1 to Current Report on Form 8-K/A, File No. 000-54621, filed by the Company with the Commission on March 30, 2012.

This letter sets forth the comments of the Staff in the comment letter (numbered in accordance with the comment letter) and, following each comment, sets forth the Company’s response. We are enclosing a copy of Amendment No. 2 to Form 8-K (the “Amended Form 8-K”).

Financial Statements for the Period Ended September 30, 2011

1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables, page F-12

1. Please revise your disclosure to describe how you recognize license revenues when the license is granted as a part of a research and development collaboration agreement.

RESPONSE: In response to the Staff’s comment, the Company has revised its disclosure to describe how it recognizes revenues when the license is granted as part of a research and development collaboration agreement.

4. Derivative Liability, page F-14

2. Please revise your disclosure to clarify whether the down-round protection of the warrants’ exercise price applies under all circumstances. Otherwise, describe the situations to which the down-round protection is limited to. Furthermore, disclose how

the exercise price will be adjusted for this provision.

Division of Corporation Finance

Attention: Mr. Michael Rosenthall

May 10, 2012

Page Two

RESPONSE: In response to the Staff’s comment, the Company has revised its disclosure to clarify the circumstances under which the down-round protection of the warrants’ exercise price applies and has disclosed how the exercise price will be adjusted for this provision.

8. Licensing Agreements, page F-20

3. Please tell us where you disclosed the amount of prior patent costs that you are required to reimburse under the licensing agreements as previously requested under comment 10.

RESPONSE: In response to the Staff’s comment, the Company has disclosed the amount of prior patent costs that it is required to reimburse under the licensing agreements. Such disclosure is found under Note 8—Licensing Agreements and Research Contracts to the audited Financial Statements of the Company included in the Amended Form 8-K.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

As requested by the Staff, the Company hereby acknowledges that:

•

the Company is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in the filing;

•

staff comments or changes to disclosure in response to staff comments do not foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to the filing; and

•

the Company may not assert staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of the United States.

Very truly yours,
DLA Piper LLP (US)

Show Raw Text
CORRESP
1
filename1.htm

SEC Response Letter

DLA Piper LLP (US)

4365 Executive Drive, Suite 1100

San Diego, California 92121-2133

www.dlapiper.com

 Jeffrey C. Thacker

jeff.thacker@dlapiper.com

T  858.638.6728

F  858.638.5128

 May 10, 2012

 Division of Corporation Finance

 U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission

100 F Street, NE

 Washington, D.C. 20549

Attention:

Mr. Jeffrey Riedler

Ms. Jennifer Riegel

Ms. Keira Ino

Mr. Gustavo Rodriguez

Mr. Michael Rosenthall

Re:

 Organovo Holdings, Inc.

Form 8-K/A

Filed March 30, 2012

File No. 333-169928

 Ladies and Gentlemen:

 This letter responds to the letter of the staff (the “Staff”) of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”), dated April 18, 2012 to Keith Murphy, Chairman of the
Board, Chief Executive Officer and President of Organovo Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) regarding the Amendment No. 1 to Current Report on Form 8-K/A, File No. 000-54621, filed by the Company with the Commission on March 30,
2012.

 This letter sets forth the comments of the Staff in the comment letter (numbered in accordance with the comment letter) and, following
each comment, sets forth the Company’s response. We are enclosing a copy of Amendment No. 2 to Form 8-K (the “Amended Form 8-K”).

 Financial Statements for the Period Ended September 30, 2011

 1. Summary of
Significant Accounting Policies

 Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables, page F-12

1.
Please revise your disclosure to describe how you recognize license revenues when the license is granted as a part of a research and development collaboration
agreement.

 RESPONSE: In response to the Staff’s comment, the Company has revised its disclosure to describe how it
recognizes revenues when the license is granted as part of a research and development collaboration agreement.

 4. Derivative Liability,
page F-14

2.
Please revise your disclosure to clarify whether the down-round protection of the warrants’ exercise price applies under all circumstances. Otherwise, describe the
situations to which the down-round protection is limited to. Furthermore, disclose how

 the exercise price will
be adjusted for this provision.

 Division of Corporation Finance

 Attention: Mr. Michael Rosenthall

 May 10, 2012

Page Two

 RESPONSE: In response to the
Staff’s comment, the Company has revised its disclosure to clarify the circumstances under which the down-round protection of the warrants’ exercise price applies and has disclosed how the exercise price will be adjusted for this
provision.

 8. Licensing Agreements, page F-20

3.
Please tell us where you disclosed the amount of prior patent costs that you are required to reimburse under the licensing agreements as previously requested under
comment 10.

 RESPONSE: In response to the Staff’s comment, the Company has disclosed the amount of prior patent
costs that it is required to reimburse under the licensing agreements. Such disclosure is found under Note 8—Licensing Agreements and Research Contracts to the audited Financial Statements of the Company included in the Amended Form 8-K.

 ACKNOWLEDGMENT

 As requested by the Staff, the Company hereby acknowledges that:

•

 the Company is responsible for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in the filing;

•

 staff comments or changes to disclosure in response to staff comments do not foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to the
filing; and

•

 the Company may not assert staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the federal securities laws of
the United States.

 Very truly yours,

DLA Piper LLP (US)

 /s/ Jeffrey C. Thacker

Jeffrey C. Thacker

Partner

WEST\229903774.3