SecProbe.io

Filing text and metadata
Intelligence Terminal Search Probe Scores Topics IPO Watchlist Monthly Activity About API

SEC Comment Letter for Streamex Corp. (STEX) (CIK 0001530766) (STEX) — Jun 9, 2014

Streamex Corp. (STEX) (CIK 0001530766)
Date: June 9, 2014 · CIK: 0001530766 · Accession: 0000000000-14-029159

AI Filing Summary & Sentiment

Sentiment
Urgency
Document Type
Confidence
SEC Posture
Company Posture

Summary

Reasoning

Date
June 6, 2014
Author
/s/ Russell Mancuso
Form
UPLOAD
Company
Streamex Corp. (STEX) (CIK 0001530766)

Letter

June 6, 2014 Via E -mail Kenneth Londoner Executive Chairman BioSig Technologies, Inc. 12424 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 745 Los Angeles, CA 90025

Re: BioSig Technologies, Inc. Amendment No. 6 to Registration Statement on Form S -1 Filed May 22, 2014 File No. 333 -190080

Dear Mr. Londoner :

We have reviewed your registration statement and have the following comments. In some of our comments, we may ask you to provide us with information so we may better understand your disclosure.

Please respond to this letter by amending your registration statement and providing the requested information . If you do not believe our comments apply to your facts and circumstances or do not bel ieve an amendment is appropriate, please tell us why in your response.

After reviewing any amendment to your registration statement and the information you provide in response to these comments, we may have additional comments.

Overview, page 1

1. We n ote your revisions in response to prior comment 1 . If Mr. Drachman alleges that the study data he received indicated that your system would not p erform in the manner that was communicated to him, please clarify your disclosure which currently states that he alleges that the withheld data led him to doubt the communications.

Certain Relationships and Related Party Transact ions, page 57

2. We note your response to prior comment 3. Please tell us :  where y ou have revised your disclosure in this section to reflect the transaction mentioned in the third paragraph to Note 3 on page F -12.  where you have disclosed the composition of the amount mentioned in the second paragraph to Note 3 on page F -12 as you have in your response such that investors

Kenneth Londoner BioSig Technologies, Inc. June 6, 2014 Page 2

can understand t he amount and terms under which disclosed compensation has been deferred .  why your revised disclosure on page 57 no longer discloses the November 21, 2012 transaction with Mr. Londoner.  who provided the $10,500 related -party advance that is reflected on your March 31, 2014 balance sheet and where this transaction is reflected in your disclosure concerning related -party trans actions.

Rule 144 Shares, page 59

3. We note your response to prior comment 4 . However, it remains unclear how this section fully complies with Regulation S -K Item 201(a)(2)(ii) since your disclosure currently addresses only a fraction of the outstanding shares. Please advise or revise .

We urge all persons who are responsible for the accuracy and adequacy of the disclosure in the filing to be certain that the filing includes the information the Securities Act of 193 3 and all applicable Securities Act rules require. Since the company and its management are in possession of all facts relating to a company’s disclosure, they are responsible for the accuracy and adequacy of the disclosures they have made.

Notwithstanding our comments, in the event you request acceleration of the effective date of the pending regist ration statement please provide a written statement from the company acknowledging that:

 should the Commission or the staff, acting pursuant to delegated authority, declare the filing ef fective, it does not foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect to the filing;

 the action of the Commission or the staff, acting pursuant to delegated authority, in declaring the filing effective, does not relieve the company from its f ull responsibility for the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in the filing; and

 the company may not assert staff comments and the declaration of effectiveness as a defense in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the federa l securities laws of the United States.

Please refer to Rules 460 and 461 regarding requests for acceleration . We will consider a written request for acceleration of the effective date of the registration statement as confirmation of the fact that those requesting acceleration are aware of their respective responsibilities under the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as they relate to the proposed public offering of the securities specified in the above registration statement. Please allow adequate time for us to review any amendment prior to the requested effective date of the registration statement.

Kenneth Londoner BioSig Technologies, Inc. June 6, 2014 Page 3

You may contact Gary Todd at (202) 551 -3605 if you have questions regarding comments on the financial statements and related matters. Please contact Joseph McCann at (202) 551 -6262 or me at (20 2) 551 -3617 with any other questions.

Sincerely,
/s/ Russell Mancuso

Show Raw Text
June 6, 2014

Via E -mail
Kenneth Londoner
Executive Chairman
BioSig Technologies, Inc.
12424 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 745
Los Angeles, CA 90025

Re: BioSig Technologies, Inc.
Amendment  No. 6  to Registration Statement on Form S -1
Filed May  22, 2014
  File No. 333 -190080

Dear Mr. Londoner :

We have reviewed your registration statement  and have the following comments.  In
some of our comments, we may ask you to provide us with information so we may better
understand your disclosure.

Please respond to this letter by amending your registration statement and providing the
requested information .  If you do not believe our comments apply to your facts and
circumstances or do not bel ieve an amendment is appropriate, please tell us why in your
response.

After reviewing any amendment to your registration statement and the information you
provide in response to these  comments, we may have  additional comments.

Overview, page 1

1. We n ote your revisions in response to prior comment 1 .  If Mr. Drachman alleges that the
study data he received  indicated that your system would not p erform in the manner that
was communicated to him, please clarify your disclosure  which currently states that he
alleges that the withheld  data led him to doubt the communications.

Certain Relationships and Related Party Transact ions, page 57

2. We note your response to prior comment 3.  Please tell us :
 where y ou have revised your disclosure in this section  to reflect the transaction
mentioned  in the third paragraph to Note 3 on page F -12.
 where you have disclosed  the composition of the amount mentioned in the second
paragraph to Note 3 on page F -12 as you have in your response such that investors

Kenneth Londoner
BioSig Technologies, Inc.
June 6, 2014
Page 2

 can understand t he amount and terms under which disclosed  compensation has been
deferred .
 why your revised disclosure on page 57 no longer discloses the November 21, 2012
transaction with Mr. Londoner.
 who provided the $10,500 related -party advance that is reflected on your March 31,
2014 balance sheet  and where this transaction is reflected in your disclosure
concerning related -party trans actions.

Rule 144 Shares, page 59

3. We note your response to prior comment 4 .  However, it remains unclear how this section
fully complies with Regulation S -K Item 201(a)(2)(ii)  since your disclosure  currently
addresses only a fraction  of the outstanding  shares.  Please advise or revise .

We urge all persons who are responsible for the accuracy and adequacy of the disclosure
in the filing to be certain that the filing includes the information the Securities Act of 193 3 and
all applicable Securities  Act rules require.   Since the company and its management are in
possession of all facts relating to a company’s disclosure, they are responsible for the accuracy
and adequacy of the disclosures they have made.

Notwithstanding our comments, in the event  you request acceleration of the effective date
of the pending regist ration statement please provide  a written statement from the company
acknowledging that:

 should the Commission or the staff, acting pursuant to delegated authority, declare the
filing ef fective, it does not foreclose the Commission from taking any action with respect
to the filing;

 the action of the Commission or the staff, acting pursuant to delegated authority, in
declaring the filing effective, does not relieve the company from its f ull responsibility for
the adequacy and accuracy of the disclosure in the filing; and

 the company may not assert staff comments and the declaration of effectiveness as a
defense in any proceeding initiated by the Commission or any person under the federa l
securities laws of the United States.

Please refer to Rules 460 and 461 regarding requests for  acceleration .  We will consider a
written request for acceleration of the effective date of the registration statement as confirmation
of the fact that those  requesting acceleration are aware of their respective responsibilities under
the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as they relate to the proposed
public offering of the securities specified in the above registration statement.   Please allow
adequate time  for us to review any amendment prior to the requested effective date of the
registration statement.

Kenneth Londoner
BioSig Technologies, Inc.
June 6, 2014
Page 3

 You may contact Gary Todd at (202) 551 -3605 if you have questions regarding
comments on the financial statements and related matters.  Please contact Joseph  McCann  at
(202) 551 -6262  or me at (20 2) 551 -3617  with any other questions.

Sincerely,

  /s/ Russell Mancuso

 Russell Mancuso
Branch Chief

cc (via e-mail) : Rick A. Werner , Esq.