SecProbe.io

CORRESP
1
filename1.htm

CORRESP

 1114 Avenue of the Americas

23rd Floor

 New York, New York

10036.7703 USA

 Tel    212.880.6000

Fax    212.682.0200

www.torys.com

 January 17, 2020

VIA EDGAR

 Securities and Exchange Commission

Division of Corporation Finance

 100 F Street, N.E.

Washington, DC 20549

 Attention: Loan Lauren Nguyen, Legal
Branch Chief

 Kevin Dougherty, Staff Attorney

Jenifer Gallagher, Staff Accountant

Mark Wojciechowski, Staff Accountant

Re:
 Brookfield Renewable Corporation

Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P.

Registration Statement on Form F-1

Filed November 8, 2019

File Nos. 333-234614 and
333-234614-01

 Amendment No. 1 to Registration
Statement on Form F-1

 Filed January 17, 2020

Dear Ladies and Gentlemen:

 We are submitting
this letter on behalf of Brookfield Renewable Corporation (the “Company”) and Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. (the “Partnership,” and together with the Company, the “Registrants”) in response to
comments from the staff (the “Staff”) of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) received by electronic mail dated December 5, 2019 relating to the Registration Statement on Form F-1 (Registration Nos. 333-234614 and 333-234614-01) of the Registrants filed with the
Commission on November 8, 2019 (the “Registration Statement”). Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement (“Amendment No. 1”) is being filed concurrently herewith. The numbered
paragraphs below correspond to the numbered comments in the Staff’s letter and the Staff’s comments are presented in bold italics. In addition to addressing the comments raised by the Staff in its letter, the Registrants have revised the
Registration Statement to update other disclosures. Unless otherwise indicated, defined terms used herein have the meanings set forth in Amendment No. 1.

 Securities and Exchange Commission

January 17, 2020

  Page
 2

 Registration Statement on Form F-1 filed November 8,
2019

 Cover Page

1.
 You disclose here and throughout your prospectus that each class A share will receive
“identical” dividends to, or dividends in the “same amount” as, the distributions paid on each unit. From disclosure on page 4 it appears that the aggregate distribution received by a holder on its units and class A shares will
be the same as if the special distribution had not been made, with distributions on the units representing four-fifths (4/5ths) of such aggregate amount, and by extension, distributions on the class A shares representing one-fifth (1/5th) of such aggregate amount. If correct, please revise to clarify throughout your prospectus that such distributions will only be identical or the same for a holder of the securities in the aggregate.
Please also clarify at the appropriate place the level of the group’s aggregate distribution a unitholder would receive if such holder exchanged all class A shares for units. For example, clarify if a unitholder in that instance would
thereafter only receive 4/5ths of the group’s aggregate distribution.

 The Registrants respectfully advise
the Staff that the disclosure appearing on page 4 of the Registration Statement (and repeated in other sections therein) is only meant to disclose the fact that the aggregate distributions to be paid on all units for the distribution date
immediately prior to the special distribution and the aggregate distributions/dividends to be paid on the units and class A shares on the distribution/dividend date immediately following the special distribution are intended to be equal in the
aggregate, even though (as a result of there being more securities outstanding from the group) the per unit/class A share distributions/dividends will be lower (although the same on a per unit/class A share basis).

For example, assuming a partnership unitholder owns 100 units prior to the special distribution, it would be entitled to receive an aggregate
of $54.25 in distributions (based on a quarterly distribution amount per unit of $0.5425) for the distribution period immediately prior to the special distribution. Based on the proposed distribution ratio of one class A share for four units, the
unitholder is expected to receive 25 class A shares and therefore immediately after the special distribution the holder would own 125 securities (100 units and 25 class A shares). The holder will still receive an aggregate distribution of $54.25
(assuming the holder continues to own the 100 units and 25 class A shares), but that $54.25 would be divided among the 100 units it owns and the 25 class A shares it owns immediately after the special distribution. Therefore, while the aggregate
distributions to be received by the holder for the distribution period immediately after the special distribution would remain the same (i.e., $54.25), the per unit/per share distribution amount would no longer be $0.5425 but rather $0.4340
per unit and $0.4340 per class A share. Therefore, the distribution amount per unit/class A share will be identical (i.e., $0.4340), but on a per unit/class A share basis it will be reduced from the
pre-closing level to take into account that there are more securities outstanding (125 rather than 100, in the above example) that will be entitled to receive distributions. This effect on the quarterly
distribution level mirrors what would happen in the event of a stock split.

 Securities and Exchange Commission

January 17, 2020

  Page
 3

 Further, if in the example above the holder of the 25 class A shares exchanged its class A
shares for units, the holder would receive 25 units upon exchange and therefore, when added to the 100 units it already owned, would now own 125 units (and zero class A shares). Therefore, the holder would now be entitled to receive $0.4340 on each
unit for an aggregate distribution of $54.25, the same amount it would have received if there had been no special distribution.

 In order
to avoid any ambiguity, we have made certain revisions and included a hypothetical example on pages 10, 11 and 58 of Amendment No. 1 to clarify the disclosure.

2.
 Please disclose on your prospectus cover page your capital stock structure and the number of votes per
share to which each class of shares is entitled. In this regard, disclose that holders of class B shares will be entitled to cast, in the aggregate, a number of votes equal to three times the number of votes attached to the class A shares.

 In response to the Staff’s comment, the Registrants have revised the disclosure on the prospectus cover page of
Amendment No. 1.

 Questions and Answers Regarding the Special Distribution

How will owning a class A share be different from owning a unit? page 7

3.
 You disclose throughout the prospectus that each class A share will be structured with the intention of
providing an economic return equivalent to one unit, “subject to adjustment to reflect certain capital events.” We further note the disclosures on page 144. Please revise to describe these capital events which may impact the exchange
ratio.

 In response to the Staff’s comment, the Registrants have revised the disclosure throughout Amendment
No. 1.

4.
 Please revise to clarify here that you and the partnership currently intend to satisfy any exchange
requests on the class A shares through the delivery of units rather than cash.

 In response to the Staff’s
comment, the Registrants have revised the disclosure on the page 15 of Amendment No. 1.

 Our Business, page 11

5.
 You disclose here and in your business section that your current operations consist of approximately
3,468 MW of installed hydroelectric capacity. However, you disclose having 3,768 MW of capacity at June 30, 2019 according to the tabular disclosure on page 60. Please reconcile the conflicting disclosures.

 In response to the Staff’s comment, the Registrants have revised the disclosure on the pages 19 and 72 of Amendment
No. 1 to reconcile the figures.

 Securities and Exchange Commission

January 17, 2020

  Page
 4

 Current Operations

Columbia page 12

6.
 We note your disclosure here and on page 62 and F-24 that your
“consortium’s” current ownership in Isagen is 99.63%, of which your share is approximately 24.17%. Please explain the nature of your investment in Isagen and clarify if your 24.17% interest refers to your economic interest in
Isagen.

 In response to the Staff’s comment, the Registrants have revised the disclosure on the pages 20 and
74 of Amendment No. 1.

 Summary

Management Fee and Incentive Distributions, page 18

7.
 Please revise to clarify how you will calculate the proportionate share of the base management fee that
you will be responsible for reimbursing Brookfield Renewable. For example, we note that your carve-out financial statements disclose “management service costs” of
$26 million in 2018, from a total base management fee disclosed on page 109 of $80 million in 2018.

In response to the Staff’s comment, the Registrants have revised the disclosure on the pages 27 to 28, 50, 120, 121 and 139 of Amendment
No. 1.

 Risk Factors

Risks Related to the Class A Shares

Our company may redeem the class A shares at any time without the consent of the holders, page 25

8.
 We note disclosure here that your board may elect to redeem all of the then outstanding class A shares
“at any time upon sixty (60) days’ prior written notice” for certain events, including the enumerated redemption events on page 25. Please revise to clarify if the board could decide to redeem all of
the then outstanding class A shares only upon the listed redemption events or for any particular reason.

 In
response to the Staff’s comment, the Registrants have revised the disclosure on the pages 34, 160 and 177 of Amendment No. 1.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”), page 67

9.
 Please revise here or in your business section to disclose the amount invested in capital
expenditures and divestures for the financial periods presented. Your presentation should also include the information concerning the principal capital expenditures currently in progress and the method of financing. See Item 4.A.5 and 6 of Form 20-F. In this regard, we note that under Note 22 on page F-45 you disclose certain capital expenditure commitments at December 31, 2018.

 Securities and Exchange Commission

January 17, 2020

  Page
 5

 In response to the Staff’s comment, the Registrants advise the Staff that the Company
has not had any material capital expenditures or divestitures during the six months ended June 30, 2019 or the three years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016. The Registrants also advise the Staff that the Company does not have any
material capital expenditures that are currently in progress. The Registrant have however revised the disclosure on page 75 of Amendment No. 1 to provide a summary of historical amounts invested in capital expenditures and divestitures for the
relevant fiscal periods, and the method of financing thereof.

 Columbia, page 74

10.
 In the last paragraph on this page and in the penultimate paragraph on page 75 you reference that funds
from operations in various financial periods materially changed in part due to changes or a lack thereof in “same-store” generation. Please revise to disclose how you determine same-store generation.

In response to the Staff’s comment, the Registrants have revised the disclosure on the pages 87 and 88 of Amendment No. 1 to remove
the reference to “same-store” generation.

 Governance

The Board of Directors, page 94

11.
 Please disclose the principal business activities performed by your officers and directors to also
include those performed outside from your company (including, in the case of directors, other principal directorships). For example, please disclose that Mr. Blidner is also a director of Brookfield Infrastructure
Partners LP and a proposed director of Brookfield Infrastructure Corp. See Item 6.A.2 of Form 20-F.

In response to the Staff’s comment, the Registrants have revised the disclosure on the page 107 of Amendment No. 1.

Material United States Federal Income Tax Considerations, page 178

12.
 We note your disclosure on page 179 that the following discussion, to the extent it express conclusions
as to the application of U.S. federal income tax law, represents the opinion of Torys LLP. However, you state on page 180 that “[b]ased on the foregoing, the general partner of the partnership believes that the partnership will be treated as a
partnership and not as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes.” Please revise to include the opinion of tax counsel here. You also disclose that Torys LLP has rendered no opinion as to a list of tax matters that appear to be legal
conclusions that determine whether a partner’s receipt of a distribution of property is generally not taxable and thereafter whether an exchange of class A shares for units will qualify as tax-free. We
further note your

 Securities and Exchange Commission

January 17, 2020

  Page
 6

disclosure throughout that you believe this transaction should not be taxable and that dividends are expected to be qualified for U.S. investors. Please revise to have counsel clearly identify
and articulate each material tax consequence being opined upon. If there is significant doubt about the tax consequences of the transaction, counsel may issue a “should” or “more likely than not” opinion to make clear that the
opinion is subject to a degree of uncertainty. Please have counsel revise the tax opinion accordingly. Refer to Section III.C.3 and 4 of Staff Legal Bulletin No. 19 for guidance.

In response to the Staff’s comment regarding the opinion of Torys LLP that the Partnership will be treated as a partnership for U.S.
federal income tax purposes, the Registrants have revised the disclosure on page 195 of Amendment No. 1 to clarify that the assumption that the Partnership and BRELP will be treated as partnerships for U.S. federal income tax purposes is based
on the opinion of Torys LLP that each of the Partnership and BRELP will be classified as a partnership and not as an association or publicly traded partnership taxable as a corporation for United States federal income tax purposes. In addition, in
response to the Staff’s comments regarding each material tax consequence being opined upon, the Registrants have revised the disclosure on pages 53, 196, 199 and 203 of Amendment No. 1 to clearly identify U.S. federal income tax issues
that are highly factual in nature or that depend on future facts and circumstances with respect to which reasonable assumptions cannot be made, and to clarify that Torys LLP has rendered no opinion with respect to these issues. The Registrants
respectfully advise the Staff that the entire discussion under the heading “MATERIAL UNITED STATES FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS,” to the extent it expresses conclusions as to the application of U.S. federal income tax law and subject
to the qualifications described therein, represents the opinion of Torys LLP.

 In response to the Staff’s comment regarding the belief
that the special distribution to U.S. unitholders should not be taxable for U.S. investors, the Registrants have revised the disclosure on pages 16, 28, 196, and 203 of Amendment No. 1 to clarify that the reason such treatment is not free from
doubt is that it depends on the highly factual determination that, for such U.S. federal income tax purposes, neither the Partnership nor BRELP has ever been engaged in a trade or business since the date of formation. The Partnership and BRELP were
each formed in 2011. In addition, the Registrants have revised the disclosure on page 196 of Amendment No. 1 to further clarify that the special distribution will be non-taxable to U.S. unitholders, even
if treated as a distribution of cash, except to the extent that the fair market value of the class A shares received, as of the date of the special distribution (pl